Mobile worklfow developers need your input!

[David Trant]

Agree with all
 


Subject: Re: Mobile worklfow developers need your input!
From: prakashreddy.sabbu at mytecsoft.com
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 10:03:11 +0530
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
CC: sap-wug at mit.edu


Same here.

Sent from my iPhone

On 16-Apr-2011, at 8:32 AM, "BJ" <shresthab at gmail.com> wrote:





Same here.
 
Just to add on Greg's response.
In Item 1: users don't like when they see the workitem but it gives an error or item not found. So its better to get later with good response.
Item 2: Optional comment is better.
 
Bijay Shrestha
SAPMANDO Services, LLC


 
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Conrad, Rod (Calgary) <Rod_Conrad at nexeninc.com> wrote:

x3



------Original Message------
From: Neil Gardiner
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
ReplyTo: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Re: Mobile worklfow developers need your input!
Sent: Apr 15, 2011 7:19 PM

Same as Greg for me.


On 16 Apr 2011, at 10:46, greg at misiorek.com wrote:

> Item 1: wait for the 'good' work items
> Item 2: comments optional on rejections is fine
>
>> Hello, The mobile development group is looking at some additional ideas
>> for workflow on mobile devices and they have the following questions for
>> you:
>> Item 1:
>> If you have to choose only one, what would be more important for you in
>> case of a mobile application for approvals when you launch the application
>> or bring it back from background after half an hour:
>>
>> A)     See the list of work items as fast as possible, so you can
>> immediately try to start working even if some of the items might be
>> out-of-date and there is some chance that you run into an error.
>>
>> B)      See an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4
>> seconds) for it.
>>
>>
>> Item 2:
>> For user decisions in the inbox, like approvals, the question is around
>> rejections.  The plan is to not require comments - but there will be an
>> option to approve/reject.  After selecting reject (for example) the user
>> will be able to reject or add comments (or cancel).  The question is: Is
>> it OK to not force comments on reject, but to make it optional only?
>>
>> So - please let us know what you think!
>> Thanks!
>> Ginger ( you can also reach me direct at
>> ginger.gatling at sap.com<mailto:ginger.gatling at sap.com>)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________

------Original Message Truncated------

--------------------------
Please forgive spelling, punctuation, and syntax errors. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

************************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that copying,
forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this message is prohibited and that taking
any action in reliance on the content of this message is to be avoided. Should you receive this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or call (403) 699-4000
and delete this message from your system. Thank you.

************************************************************




_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug


-- 
Bijay Shrestha

**************************************************
"The difference between the impossible 
and the possible lies in a 
person's determination."
- Tommy Lasorda 

*******************************************************


_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

_______________________________________________ SAP-WUG mailing list SAP-WUG at mit.edu http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110416/d11edafe/attachment.htm