Mobile worklfow developers need your input!

Prakashreddy Sabbu prakashreddy.sabbu at mytecsoft.com
Sat Apr 16 00:33:11 EDT 2011


Same here.

Sent from my iPhone

On 16-Apr-2011, at 8:32 AM, "BJ" <shresthab at gmail.com> wrote:

> Same here.
>  
> Just to add on Greg's response.
> In Item 1: users don't like when they see the workitem but it gives an error or item not found. So its better to get later with good response.
> Item 2: Optional comment is better.
>  
> Bijay Shrestha
> SAPMANDO Services, LLC
> 
> 
>  
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Conrad, Rod (Calgary) <Rod_Conrad at nexeninc.com> wrote:
> x3
> ------Original Message------
> From: Neil Gardiner
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> ReplyTo: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: Re: Mobile worklfow developers need your input!
> Sent: Apr 15, 2011 7:19 PM
> 
> Same as Greg for me.
> 
> 
> On 16 Apr 2011, at 10:46, greg at misiorek.com wrote:
> 
> > Item 1: wait for the 'good' work items
> > Item 2: comments optional on rejections is fine
> >
> >> Hello, The mobile development group is looking at some additional ideas
> >> for workflow on mobile devices and they have the following questions for
> >> you:
> >> Item 1:
> >> If you have to choose only one, what would be more important for you in
> >> case of a mobile application for approvals when you launch the application
> >> or bring it back from background after half an hour:
> >>
> >> A)     See the list of work items as fast as possible, so you can
> >> immediately try to start working even if some of the items might be
> >> out-of-date and there is some chance that you run into an error.
> >>
> >> B)      See an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4
> >> seconds) for it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Item 2:
> >> For user decisions in the inbox, like approvals, the question is around
> >> rejections.  The plan is to not require comments - but there will be an
> >> option to approve/reject.  After selecting reject (for example) the user
> >> will be able to reject or add comments (or cancel).  The question is: Is
> >> it OK to not force comments on reject, but to make it optional only?
> >>
> >> So - please let us know what you think!
> >> Thanks!
> >> Ginger ( you can also reach me direct at
> >> ginger.gatling at sap.com<mailto:ginger.gatling at sap.com>)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> 
> ------Original Message Truncated------
> 
> --------------------------
> Please forgive spelling, punctuation, and syntax errors. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> 
> ************************************************************
> 
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended for the individual or entity to which it is addressed
> and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that copying,
> forwarding or other dissemination or distribution of this message is prohibited and that taking
> any action in reliance on the content of this message is to be avoided. Should you receive this
> e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately via e-mail or call (403) 699-4000
> and delete this message from your system. Thank you.
> 
> ************************************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bijay Shrestha
> 
> **************************************************
> "The difference between the impossible 
> and the possible lies in a 
> person's determination."
> - Tommy Lasorda 
> 
> *******************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20110416/b955294d/attachment.htm


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list