Mobile worklfow developers need your input!

[Neil Gardiner]

Same as Greg for me.


On 16 Apr 2011, at 10:46, greg at misiorek.com wrote:

> Item 1: wait for the 'good' work items
> Item 2: comments optional on rejections is fine
>
>> Hello, The mobile development group is looking at some additional ideas
>> for workflow on mobile devices and they have the following questions for
>> you:
>> Item 1:
>> If you have to choose only one, what would be more important for you in
>> case of a mobile application for approvals when you launch the application
>> or bring it back from background after half an hour:
>>
>> A)     See the list of work items as fast as possible, so you can
>> immediately try to start working even if some of the items might be
>> out-of-date and there is some chance that you run into an error.
>>
>> B)      See an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4
>> seconds) for it.
>>
>>
>> Item 2:
>> For user decisions in the inbox, like approvals, the question is around
>> rejections.  The plan is to not require comments - but there will be an
>> option to approve/reject.  After selecting reject (for example) the user
>> will be able to reject or add comments (or cancel).  The question is: Is
>> it OK to not force comments on reject, but to make it optional only?
>>
>> So - please let us know what you think!
>> Thanks!
>> Ginger ( you can also reach me direct at
>> ginger.gatling at sap.com<mailto:ginger.gatling at sap.com>)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>
>
>
> Greg Misiorek,
> MBA CPA PMP
> BIS LLC
> 91 Hemlock Ridge Rd
> Southbury, CT 06488
>
> Phone/Voice mail: (203) 848 5150
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug