Mobile worklfow developers need your input!

greg@misiorek.com greg at misiorek.com
Fri Apr 15 20:43:54 EDT 2011


Item 1: wait for the 'good' work items
Item 2: comments optional on rejections is fine

> Hello, The mobile development group is looking at some additional ideas
> for workflow on mobile devices and they have the following questions for
> you:
> Item 1:
> If you have to choose only one, what would be more important for you in
> case of a mobile application for approvals when you launch the application
> or bring it back from background after half an hour:
>
> A)     See the list of work items as fast as possible, so you can
> immediately try to start working even if some of the items might be
> out-of-date and there is some chance that you run into an error.
>
> B)      See an up-to-date list of work items and wait a bit more (2-4
> seconds) for it.
>
>
> Item 2:
> For user decisions in the inbox, like approvals, the question is around
> rejections.  The plan is to not require comments - but there will be an
> option to approve/reject.  After selecting reject (for example) the user
> will be able to reject or add comments (or cancel).  The question is: Is
> it OK to not force comments on reject, but to make it optional only?
>
> So - please let us know what you think!
> Thanks!
> Ginger ( you can also reach me direct at
> ginger.gatling at sap.com<mailto:ginger.gatling at sap.com>)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>


Greg Misiorek,
MBA CPA PMP
BIS LLC
91 Hemlock Ridge Rd
Southbury, CT 06488

Phone/Voice mail: (203) 848 5150




More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list