Background Workflow steps taking many hours to execute

Sample, Rick Rick.Sample at graybar.com
Sat Nov 13 12:14:11 EST 2010


one more thing, you should be able to see that in the log. 
Go to the task in question, tech view, and see what the logs tell you.
Admin would have logged a re-executed every 20mins. Errors should
be sent to the admin as msg.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
> Behalf Of Sample, Rick
> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 10:56
> AM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: RE: Background Workflow steps
> taking many hours to execute
> 
> I agree, need more info. Like, any recent
> changes to code like a loop?
> 
> But, temp errors are default to 20mins. 20
> 20 and 20 is around 60, depending on
> start / finish of SWWERR job.
> Note: in 4.6c, the default was 20mins for
> the Temp Err, I believe that has changed
> for ECC6 due to BPM. But we stuck to
> 20mins.
> 
> So, if temp error, sounds like it was re-
> attempting something until it finished.
> *sounds* like it.
> Check the Task BOR method for temp
> exceptions.
> 
> Rick Sample
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
> > Behalf Of Jimmy Sun
> > Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010
> 9:58 AM
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: Re: Background Workflow
> steps taking many hours to execute
> >
> > Carolyn,
> > If you can explain more detail of what is
> the step doing, it will help
> > to determine ther problem.
> >
> > Jimmy Sun
> > Senior Consultant
> > On 11/12/10, Carolyn A Fuller
> > <fuller at mit.edu> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Recently, my end users have started
> > complaining about the performance
> > > of some of their workflow background
> > steps. They said that this has
> > > just recently become a problem.
> > >
> > > Today, I looked at the logs for one of
> the
> > excessively slow workflow
> > > background steps and it indicated that
> > the background step was created
> > > at 14:37:49, then started and ended
> > over an hour later at 15:40:06.
> > > This step normally takes less than a
> > second to execute.
> > >
> > > What could cause the hour delay
> > between when the step was created and
> > > when the step actually started and
> > ended?
> > >
> > > The workflow in question is using XML
> > persistence. I converted this
> > > workflow to using XML persistence
> > about a year and a half ago.
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Carolyn Fuller
> > >
> > > Senior Analyst/ Programmer
> > >
> > > Information Services and Technology
> > >
> > > Massachusetts Institute of Technology
> > >
> > > Room W92-210
> > >
> > > Cambridge, MA 02139
> > >
> > > (617) 253-6213
> > >
> > > http://fuller.mit.edu/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > 「Money is gone, nothing is
> > gone.(失去了金錢,沒有失去什麼);
> >     Hope is gone, everything is
> >
> gone.(失去了希望,就失去了全部)。」
> >
> >
> __________________________________
> > _____________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap
> > -wug
> 
> __________________________________
> _____________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap
> -wug




More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list