This Group

[Sample, Rick]

Hi Mike,

Putting aside the original intent of this thread, 
I am curious as to how much others have put into SAP's newer BPM tools.
So far, I have really only done 4.6c work. A little ABAP objects here, 
a few simple classes there, etc. 

I have never used the "Composite Environment" or any of the tools, 
but I have been recently tasked to start reviewing these for BPM. 

I will be visiting SDN BPM quite frequently I suspect. But are there 
numbers / percent of customers that have migrated to these tools and 
processes? BPM, SOA, etc. sounds nice, but also sounds like a huge leap. 

Regards,
Rick




> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of Madgambler
> Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:04 PM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Cc: SAP Workflow Users' Group; sap-wug-request at mit.edu
> Subject: Re: This Group
> 
> Hi,
> 
> No point replying to other posts on this thread as the original
> message is succinct enough to merit a direct response.
> 
> I think the attention being paid to this forum is directly
> proportional to the amount and complexity of Workflow development
> being carried out and the depth of Workflow development experience in
> the average subscriber.
> 
> Now it could be argued that fewer 'new' Workflow issues being
> discussed here could mean good or bad things are happening in the real
> world. From my personal experience it seems more likely that SAP
> Buisiness Workflow is receding as a tool and waning as a skillset.
> 
> Granted it's more immediately accessible to the general Client because
> it's embedded in the standard offering. But are people pushing the
> boundaries of what it can do or have we hit them already and that's as
> far as SAP plan to take it?
> 
> These days the juicier Business Process Modelling projects are being
> done in the Composite Environment (Java) arena and less often in the
> ABAP stack at all.
> 
> So rather than this Forum losing support I would actually argue that
> Workflow itself has reached a plateau and stopped evolving. Perhaps
> only for a while...
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Mike GT
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 4 May 2010, at 16:48, Nash John <emailtonash at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi
> >
> > I get the feeling that this group is slowly but steadily loosing its
> > significance as I don't see members active/willing to get involved
> > in discussion/help as it used to be 3 to 4 years ago.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Nash
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug