workflow classes: IF_WORKFLOW interface
dbaitman dbaitman
dbaitman at myexcel.com
Mon Mar 23 08:21:27 EDT 2009
The where used for classes has always been bad. I suggest running SE16N on
view VSEOIMPLEM. Enter "IF_WORKFLOW" in the REFCLSNAME field.
I get 75... though 2 are mine and a few are DFPS specific.
David Baitman
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:36 AM, <sap-wug-request at mit.edu> wrote:
> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> sap-wug at mit.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. workflow classes: IF_WORKFLOW interface
> (Paul.Bakker at osr.treasury.qld.gov.au)
> 2. Re: workflow classes: IF_WORKFLOW interface (Florin Wach (gmx))
> 3. RE: Problems with Event Creator step (Tor Magne Refsland)
> 4. AW: Problems with Event Creator step
> (Schmidinger, Heinz (Oerlikon TR))
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Paul.Bakker at osr.treasury.qld.gov.au
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:46:06 +1000
> Subject: workflow classes: IF_WORKFLOW interface
> Florin,
>
> Ja, there seems to be a problem with the 'where-used' functionality for
> interfaces.
> Using this method, I can only find 2 classes that use IF_WORKFLOW - and
> we're on ECC 6 Basis 7.01
>
> I know that there are many more.
>
> I've been caught out with this already: building a custom class, then
> finding a perfectly good standard one later!
>
> cheers
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> "Florin Wach"
> <florin.wach at gmx.
> net> To
> Sent by: "SAP Workflow Users' Group"
> sap-wug-bounces at m <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> it.edu cc
>
> Subject
> 20/03/2009 04:48 Re: RE: RE: What is the OO
> PM equivalent of SELFITEM.DISPLAY?
>
>
> Please respond to
> "SAP Workflow
> Users' Group"
> <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Jocelyn,
>
> what is Enhancement Pack 4? We're on ECC 6.0 Basis 7.00 HP13. SAP R/3.
>
> Best wishes,
> Florin
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:45:02 +0800
> > Von: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
> > An: "SAP Workflow Users\' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Betreff: RE: RE: What is the OO equivalent of SELFITEM.DISPLAY?
>
> >
> > Depends on your release and enhancement packs.... It's more like 30 if
> > you are up to EHP4.
> > Regards,
> > Jocelyn
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> > Of Florin Wach
> > Sent: Thursday, 19 March 2009 5:24 PM
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: Re: RE: What is the OO equivalent of SELFITEM.DISPLAY?
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > to find out about workflow-OO classes use the where-used-list of the
> > interface IF_WORKFLOW.
> > You will find about 4.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Florin
> >
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > > Datum: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:29:25 -0000
> > > Von: "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com>
> > > An: "\'SAP Workflow Users\' Group\'" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > > Betreff: RE: What is the OO equivalent of SELFITEM.DISPLAY?
> >
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > As Jocelyn already indicated, a single-choice decision gives you the
> > best
> > > result in the UWL.
> > > An alternative if it's going to be SAPGUI based is to use an empty
> > method
> > > (OO of course!) and switch on the 'confirm end of processing'. Since
> > the
> > > workitem text is in the confirmation dialog, it works similar to
> > > SELFITEM.DISPLAY but gives a much neater popup window effect.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
> > > > Behalf Of Paul.Bakker at osr.treasury.qld.gov.au
> > > > Sent: 12 March 2009 23:13
> > > > To: SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > Subject: What is the OO equivalent of SELFITEM.DISPLAY?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Work Flowers,
> > > >
> > > > We are moving to ECC 6.0, and have the opportunity of rebuilding /
> > > > improving some of our custom workflows.
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to do as much as possible in OO, so I'm wondering what
> > the
> > > > OO
> > > > equivalent for SELFITEM.DISPLAY is.
> > > > (We use it in a simple, multi-purpose notification workflow, that
> > just
> > > > passes a table of text).
> > > >
> > > > I don't want to sound like a luddite or anything, but finding
> > candidate
> > > > BOR
> > > > objects via SWO1 seems a lot
> > > > easier than wading through the thousands of similarly-named OO
> > classes
> > > > in
> > > > SE24!
> > > >
> > > > Or am I taiking the wrong approach?
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > ***********************************************************************
> > > >
> > ***********************************************************************
> > > > ********
> > > >
> > > > Only an individual or entity who is intended to be a recipient of
> > this
> > > > e-mail may access or use the information contained in this e-mail or
> > > > any of its attachments. Opinions contained in this e-mail or any of
> > > > its attachments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
> > Queensland
> > > > Treasury.
> > > >
> > > > The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential and
> > > > may be legally privileged and the subject of copyright. If you have
> > > > received this e-mail in error, please notify Queensland Treasury
> > > > immediately and erase all copies of the e-mail and the attachments.
> > > > Queensland Treasury uses virus scanning software. However, it is
> > not
> > > > liable for viruses present in this e-mail or in any attachment.
> > > >
> > > >
> > ***********************************************************************
> > > >
> > ***********************************************************************
> > > > ********
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Florin Wach (gmx)" <florin.wach at gmx.net>
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:42:28 +0100
> Subject: Re: workflow classes: IF_WORKFLOW interface
> oh, ... thanks to Paul!
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: <Paul.Bakker at osr.treasury.qld.gov.au>
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 12:46 AM
> Subject: workflow classes: IF_WORKFLOW interface
>
>
> Florin,
>>
>> Ja, there seems to be a problem with the 'where-used' functionality for
>> interfaces.
>> Using this method, I can only find 2 classes that use IF_WORKFLOW - and
>> we're on ECC 6 Basis 7.01
>>
>> I know that there are many more.
>>
>> I've been caught out with this already: building a custom class, then
>> finding a perfectly good standard one later!
>>
>> cheers
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Florin Wach"
>> <florin.wach at gmx.
>> net> To
>> Sent by: "SAP Workflow Users' Group"
>> sap-wug-bounces at m <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>> it.edu cc
>>
>> Subject
>> 20/03/2009 04:48 Re: RE: RE: What is the OO
>> PM equivalent of SELFITEM.DISPLAY?
>>
>>
>> Please respond to
>> "SAP Workflow
>> Users' Group"
>> <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Jocelyn,
>>
>> what is Enhancement Pack 4? We're on ECC 6.0 Basis 7.00 HP13. SAP R/3.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Florin
>>
>> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>>
>>> Datum: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:45:02 +0800
>>> Von: "Dart, Jocelyn" <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
>>> An: "SAP Workflow Users\' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>>> Betreff: RE: RE: What is the OO equivalent of SELFITEM.DISPLAY?
>>>
>>
>>
>>> Depends on your release and enhancement packs.... It's more like 30 if
>>> you are up to EHP4.
>>> Regards,
>>> Jocelyn
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
>>> Of Florin Wach
>>> Sent: Thursday, 19 March 2009 5:24 PM
>>> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
>>> Subject: Re: RE: What is the OO equivalent of SELFITEM.DISPLAY?
>>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> to find out about workflow-OO classes use the where-used-list of the
>>> interface IF_WORKFLOW.
>>> You will find about 4.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Florin
>>>
>>> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>>> > Datum: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:29:25 -0000
>>> > Von: "Mike Pokraka" <wug at workflowconnections.com>
>>> > An: "\'SAP Workflow Users\' Group\'" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>>> > Betreff: RE: What is the OO equivalent of SELFITEM.DISPLAY?
>>>
>>> > Hi Paul,
>>> >
>>> > As Jocelyn already indicated, a single-choice decision gives you the
>>> best
>>> > result in the UWL.
>>> > An alternative if it's going to be SAPGUI based is to use an empty
>>> method
>>> > (OO of course!) and switch on the 'confirm end of processing'. Since
>>> the
>>> > workitem text is in the confirmation dialog, it works similar to
>>> > SELFITEM.DISPLAY but gives a much neater popup window effect.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Mike
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
>>> > > Behalf Of Paul.Bakker at osr.treasury.qld.gov.au
>>> > > Sent: 12 March 2009 23:13
>>> > > To: SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>>> > > Subject: What is the OO equivalent of SELFITEM.DISPLAY?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Hi Work Flowers,
>>> > >
>>> > > We are moving to ECC 6.0, and have the opportunity of rebuilding /
>>> > > improving some of our custom workflows.
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm trying to do as much as possible in OO, so I'm wondering what
>>> the
>>> > > OO
>>> > > equivalent for SELFITEM.DISPLAY is.
>>> > > (We use it in a simple, multi-purpose notification workflow, that
>>> just
>>> > > passes a table of text).
>>> > >
>>> > > I don't want to sound like a luddite or anything, but finding
>>> candidate
>>> > > BOR
>>> > > objects via SWO1 seems a lot
>>> > > easier than wading through the thousands of similarly-named OO
>>> classes
>>> > > in
>>> > > SE24!
>>> > >
>>> > > Or am I taiking the wrong approach?
>>> > >
>>> > > cheers
>>> > > Paul
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> ***********************************************************************
>>> > >
>>> ***********************************************************************
>>> > > ********
>>> > >
>>> > > Only an individual or entity who is intended to be a recipient of
>>> this
>>> > > e-mail may access or use the information contained in this e-mail or
>>> > > any of its attachments. Opinions contained in this e-mail or any of
>>> > > its attachments do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
>>> Queensland
>>> > > Treasury.
>>> > >
>>> > > The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential and
>>> > > may be legally privileged and the subject of copyright. If you have
>>> > > received this e-mail in error, please notify Queensland Treasury
>>> > > immediately and erase all copies of the e-mail and the attachments.
>>> > > Queensland Treasury uses virus scanning software. However, it is
>>> not
>>> > > liable for viruses present in this e-mail or in any attachment.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> ***********************************************************************
>>> > >
>>> ***********************************************************************
>>> > > ********
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
>>> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>>> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > SAP-WUG mailing list
>>> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>>> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Tor Magne Refsland <fallenblake at hotmail.com>
> To: SAP WUG list <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:21:56 +0000
> Subject: RE: Problems with Event Creator step
> Hi all,
>
> can anyone please give me som input on this matter?
>
> I am totally stuck atm.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tor
>
> ------------------------------
> From: fallenblake at hotmail.com
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Subject: Problems with Event Creator step
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:50:51 +0000
>
> Dear experts,
>
> I have a main process A which is connected to workflow A and a secondary
> process B which is connected to workflow B.
>
> Workflow A will call workflow B as a subworkflow.
>
> The passing of field values between forms in process B has been declared in
> Process A. This due to it seems like workflow B is ignoring the field value
> passing declared in process B, when workflow B is called as a subworkflow.
>
> Workflow B contains a Event Creator step, "Send reminder to manager". The
> step basically sends a work item in the managers UWL, which contains a form
> with values
>
>
> The step works perfectly when I start workflow B as a main workflow.
>
> *The problem is:*
> "When I start workflow A which contains subworkflow B, the Event Creator
> step in subworkflow B doesn`t work. The form is displayed, but with no
> values.
> How can I fix this?"
>
> The workflow A displays other forms in subworkflow B, so the fieldpassing
> from process A to B works fine.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Check
> it out! <http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx>
> ------------------------------
> check out the rest of the Windows Live™. More than mail–Windows Live™ goes
> way beyond your inbox. More than messages<http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Schmidinger, Heinz (Oerlikon TR)" <heinz.schmidinger at oerlikon.com>
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:36:25 +0100
> Subject: AW: Problems with Event Creator step
>
> Hi Tor,
>
>
>
> do you pass the field values from Workflow A to Sunworkflow B by using
> container-declarations in Workflow B and Container-Bindings from A -> B?
>
>
>
> Hope it helps.
>
>
>
> Greetings
>
> Heinz
>
>
>
> *_______________________________________*
>
> *Heinz Schmidinger*
> Certified Senior Application Consultant **
>
> Oerlikon Solar AG, Trübbach
>
> Hauptstrasse 1a
>
> 9477 Trübbach
>
> Schweiz
>
> P +41 58 356 8626
> F +41 58 356 8826
> heinz.schmidinger at oerlikon.com
>
> www.oerlikon.com/solar
>
> This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
> are not the intended recipient or have received this e-mail in error, please
> notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Unauthorised copying,
> disclosure and distribution of the material in this e-mail are strictly
> prohibited.
>
>
>
> Diese E-Mail enthaelt vertrauliche und/oder geschuetzte Informationen. Wenn
> Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtuemlich erhalten
> haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese
> Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail
> sind nicht gestattet.
>
> *Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail.*
>
> *Bitte denken Sie an unsere Umwelt, bevor Sie diese E-Mail ausdrucken.*
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Von:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] *Im
> Auftrag von *Tor Magne Refsland
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 23. März 2009 11:22
> *An:* SAP WUG list
> *Betreff:* RE: Problems with Event Creator step
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> can anyone please give me som input on this matter?
>
> I am totally stuck atm.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tor
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: fallenblake at hotmail.com
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Subject: Problems with Event Creator step
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:50:51 +0000
>
> Dear experts,
>
> I have a main process A which is connected to workflow A and a secondary
> process B which is connected to workflow B.
>
> Workflow A will call workflow B as a subworkflow.
>
> The passing of field values between forms in process B has been declared in
> Process A. This due to it seems like workflow B is ignoring the field value
> passing declared in process B, when workflow B is called as a subworkflow.
>
> Workflow B contains a Event Creator step, "Send reminder to manager". The
> step basically sends a work item in the managers UWL, which contains a form
> with values
>
>
> The step works perfectly when I start workflow B as a main workflow.
>
> *The problem is:*
> "When I start workflow A which contains subworkflow B, the Event Creator
> step in subworkflow B doesn`t work. The form is displayed, but with no
> values.
> How can I fix this?"
>
> The workflow A displays other forms in subworkflow B, so the fieldpassing
> from process A to B works fine.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tor
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Check
> it out! <http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx>
> ------------------------------
>
> check out the rest of the Windows Live™. More than mail–Windows Live™ goes
> way beyond your inbox. More than messages<http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090323/b82b92df/attachment.htm
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list