Question regarding creating a rule based on vendor
Viera, Miguel
VieraM at dhcmc.com
Wed Jul 22 12:39:02 EDT 2009
Nat,
Here are some print screens of the rule, binding and workflow:
[cid:image007.jpg at 01CA0AC9.640601E0][cid:image008.jpg at 01CA0AC9.640601E0]
[cid:image009.jpg at 01CA0AC9.640601E0] [cid:image011.jpg at 01CA0AC9.640601E0]
[cid:image013.jpg at 01CA0AC9.640601E0] [cid:image015.jpg at 01CA0AC9.640601E0]
[cid:image020.jpg at 01CA0AC9.640601E0][cid:image022.jpg at 01CA0AC9.640601E0]
[cid:image027.jpg at 01CA0AC9.640601E0]
Container Element in Workflow Container is identical to Container Element in Rule.
Thanks again for taking the time to look at this for me.
Miguel R. Viera
Deere-Hitachi C.M.C
SAP Business Analyst for FI-CO & SD Modules
Workflow Admin. & Winshuttle Template Designer
Phone: (336) 992-5759
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:22:52 +0200
From: Nat 4 Govender <ngovender4 at toyota.co.za>
Subject: Re: Question regarding creating a rule based on vendor
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Cc: "'sap-wug at mit.edu'" <sap-wug at mit.edu>, sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
Message-ID:
<OF88B98F2F.1443E59B-ON422575FB.0017901D-422575FB.0017A370 at toyota.co.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Miguel,
Would it be possible to provide screen shots of the binding from your
workflow to your task and the rule as well.
Maybe I can get a better understanding.
Regards
Nat Govender
Toyota South Africa
IT - SAP Workflow Specialist
Internal Ext. : 32645
Direct Line : +27 031 910 2645
Fax : 086 607 0414
E-mail : ngovender4 at toyota.co.za
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.
"Viera, Miguel"
<VieraM at dhcmc.com
> To
Sent by: "'sap-wug at mit.edu'"
sap-wug-bounces at m <sap-wug at mit.edu>
it.edu cc
Subject
21-07-2009 03:59 Re: Question regarding creating a
PM rule based on vendor
Please respond to
"SAP Workflow
Users' Group"
<sap-wug at mit.edu>
Nat,
The field (LIFNR) in the container element embedded in the workflow
container through binding is the same as the field in the container element
in the rule. When I checked the task I created I noticed it did not have a
container element for vendor so I created one. I also checked "Terminate
if rule resolution without result." I refreshed the system in SWU_OBUF and
tested the scenario with the following result:
Five separate responsibilities have been created in Rule 90300001. The
responsibilities have priorities from 1 to 5 and I have checked "Consider
Secondary Priorities." The test scenario on a Price Block WF for vendor #2
resulted in the work item getting assigned to the highest priority 5 even
though that position is only responsible for vendor #69. The work item
should have been assigned to the position with the priority of 1. I have
also tested this with setting all priorities to 99 which resulted in the
work item getting assigned to all the positions listed in the rule.
For some reason it doesn't seem to want to select the specific position
assigned to the vendor associated with the Price Block Workflow. Thanks
for your insight and for taking the time to reply.
Miguel R. Viera
Deere-Hitachi C.M.C
SAP Business Analyst for FI-CO & SD Modules
Workflow Admin. & Winshuttle Template Designer
Phone: (336) 992-5759
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:50:59 +0200
From: Nat 4 Govender <ngovender4 at toyota.co.za>
Subject: Re: Question regarding creating a rule based on vendor
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Cc: "'sap-wug at mit.edu'" <sap-wug at mit.edu>, sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
Message-ID:
<OF91F7E631.ED5EC5C2-ON422575FA.00467C8E-422575FA.00462859 at toyota.co.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Is the field in the workflow the same as the in the rule?
Check the binding in the task.
Also test the task itself.
Regards
Nat Govender
Toyota South Africa
IT - SAP Workflow Specialist
Internal Ext. : 32645
Direct Line : +27 031 910 2645
Fax : 086 607 0414
E-mail : ngovender4 at toyota.co.za
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything.
"Viera, Miguel"
<VieraM at dhcmc.com
> To
Sent by: "'sap-wug at mit.edu'"
sap-wug-bounces at m <sap-wug at mit.edu>
it.edu cc
Subject
21-07-2009 02:45 Re: Question regarding creating a
PM rule based on vendor
Please respond to
"SAP Workflow
Users' Group"
<sap-wug at mit.edu>
Nat,
The from value and the to value are the same in the rule. I do have
multiple from and to values assigned per rule due to the number of vendors
assigned to a specific position.
EX.
Name From To
Vendor 2 2
Vendor 22 22
I have checked "consider secondary priorities" and numbered the rules 1
through 5; however, when I initiate a Price Block Workflow the position
chosen through my rule ends up being the highest priority regardless of
whether it is their assigned vendor from the rule. The strange thing is
that this is testing successfully for the different rules I have created in
"Simulate rule resolution."
Thanks for your comment.
Miguel R. Viera
Deere-Hitachi C.M.C
SAP Business Analyst for FI-CO & SD Modules
Workflow Admin. & Winshuttle Template Designer
Phone: (336) 992-5759
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090722/fa2fb447/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image007.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 18975 bytes
Desc: image007.jpg
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090722/fa2fb447/attachment.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image008.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 15855 bytes
Desc: image008.jpg
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090722/fa2fb447/attachment-0001.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image009.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 12004 bytes
Desc: image009.jpg
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090722/fa2fb447/attachment-0002.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image011.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 28560 bytes
Desc: image011.jpg
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090722/fa2fb447/attachment-0003.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image013.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 17543 bytes
Desc: image013.jpg
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090722/fa2fb447/attachment-0004.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image015.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 21594 bytes
Desc: image015.jpg
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090722/fa2fb447/attachment-0005.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image020.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 26209 bytes
Desc: image020.jpg
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090722/fa2fb447/attachment-0006.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image022.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 23048 bytes
Desc: image022.jpg
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090722/fa2fb447/attachment-0007.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image027.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 39319 bytes
Desc: image027.jpg
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090722/fa2fb447/attachment-0008.bin
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list