Delivery election & Schedule selection in Extended Notif. Config.

Ramki Maley rmaley at erpworkflow.com
Fri Feb 27 07:45:13 EST 2009


Stefaan,

As Jocelyn mentioned, certain standard BSPs that are used to build the 
messages need to be activated in the Standard Environment. Please see 
the doco. at the link I provided in my previous reply and you would see 
that activating the services is pre-requisite.

You can run the Report SWN_TEST_VERI01 to verify the Standard eMAil 
Notification Functionality. See instructions at the link below:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8e/bb9f4099852e54e10000000a1550b0/content.htm

You should receive an eMail. The message would also tell you if there 
are any Standard BSPs that need to be activated.

If I remember right the Phone Number message is in fact due to some of 
the services not being activated.

Cheers,
Ramki.

Stefaan Vermeulen wrote:
> Jocelyn, Ramki,
>  
> We're talking about different things I think.
> I'm just trying to set up a this in a standard environment : ECC6 / SAP 
> GUI / Outlook & that's it.
>  
> I don't understand why I'm blocked with this error related to BSP (which 
> we don't use).
>  
> kind regards,
> Stefaan.
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 2009/2/27 Dart, Jocelyn <jocelyn.dart at sap.com <mailto:jocelyn.dart at sap.com>>
> 
>     Folks, there is a BSP application used for the Message Template -
>     you can see the name in that section of SWNCONFIG.
>     It's used to build the layout of the reminder. 
>     Regards,
>     Jocelyn
> 
>     *From:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>
>     [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>]
>     *On Behalf Of *Stefaan Vermeulen
>     *Sent:* Thursday, 26 February 2009 10:13 PM
> 
>     *To:* SAP Workflow Users' Group
>     *Subject:* [LIKELY JUNK]Re: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: [LIKELY JUNK]Re:
>     Delivery selection & Schedule selection in Extended Notif. Config.
> 
>     Rick,
>      
>     Not really, I presume it's not about e-mail addresses or phone
>     numbers, but because of not having a BSP template or active protal,
>     more in that region.
>      
>     kr,S;
> 
>     2009/2/26 Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com <mailto:rbakker at gmail.com>>
> 
>         Hello,
> 
>         Did you look what's happening within fm SWN_CALL_BSP during debug
>         to see why it's "Unable to determine" e-mail addresses and
>         telephone numbers?
> 
>         regards
>         Rick Bakker
>         Hanabi Technology
> 
>         On 2/25/09, Griffiths, Mark <mark.griffiths at sap.com
>         <mailto:mark.griffiths at sap.com>> wrote:
>          >
>          > That error message sometimes results from some of the SWN*
>         BSP applications
>          > not being activated in transaction SICF.
>          >
>          > Hope this helps,
>          >
>          >
>          > Mark
>          >
>          > SAP UK
>          >
>          >
>          > ________________________________
>          >
>          > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>
>          > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
>         <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>] On Behalf Of Stefaan
>          > Vermeulen
>          > Sent: 25 February 2009 15:57
>          > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
>          > Subject: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: Delivery selection
>         & Schedule
>          > selection in Extended Notif. Config.
>          >
>          >
>          > Thanks Rick and Jocelyn for the extra info,
>          >
>          > I narrowed my problem down to the sending part of  SWN_SELSEN.
>          > Message SWN 032 seems to be the killer here.
>          > By debugging it seems a call function that uses a template
>         related to BSP
>          > produces the error.
>          > message SWN 032.
>          >
>          > I thought solving this by creating another delivery type not
>         related to the
>          > template, but it seems this field( BSP-URL) has to be filled up.
>          >
>          > What am I still missing ?
>          >
>          > kind regards,
>          > Stefaan.
>          > In attachment related prints
>          >
>          >
>          >
>          >
>          >
>          >
>          > 2009/2/24 Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com
>         <mailto:rbakker at gmail.com>>
>          > > Stefaan,
>          > >
>          > > Stefaan,
>          > >
>          > > How many entries do you have in table SWN_NOTIF? That's
>          > > the table filled by the Selection process and read by
>          > > the Delivery process.
>          > >
>          > > Because you haven't been able to send any, maybe they're
>          > > piling up. And maybe when you first ran it you didn't
>          > > have a very restrictive filter in place? This could explain
>          > > why it's showing 56K notifications selected.
>          > >
>          > > I tried removing the telephone number from a user, the
>         notification
>          > > still made it to SOST.
>          > >
>          > >
>          > > regards
>          > > Rick Bakker
>          > > Hanabi Technology
>          > >
>          > >
>          > >
>          > >
>          > > On 2/23/09, Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com
>         <mailto:rbakker at gmail.com>> wrote:
>          > > > Stefaan,
>          > > >
>          > > > 'Unable to send 000000 messages due to errors'
>          > > > That's good news.
>          > > >
>          > > > "It seems that also the users telephone number has to be
>         filled in to
>          > > > avoid an error"
>          > > > I find that very unlikely. I'll have to try that. I
>         suspect all my users
>          > > > have telephone numbers.
>          > > >
>          > > > "The subscription part is that Ok(attachment)? in your
>         opinion "
>          > > > Yes.  Well, it's the same as mine.
>          > > >
>          > > > I'm not sure why it's picking up 50K messages, SLG1 is
>          > > > a good idea. Or do some debugging - a good way to learn
>          > > > about the internals.
>          > > >
>          > > > regards
>          > > > Rick Bakker
>          > > > Hanabi Technology
>          > > >
>          > > >
>          > > > On 2/23/09, Dart, Jocelyn <jocelyn.dart at sap.com
>         <mailto:jocelyn.dart at sap.com>> wrote:
>          > > > >
>          > > > > Stefan,
>          > > > >
>          > > > > Try using transaction SLG1 when you get errors ... you
>         will find logs
>          > giving
>          > > > > more details.
>          > > > > Regards,
>          > > > > Jocelyn
>          > > > > ________________________________
>          > > > > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
>         <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>
>          > > > > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
>         <mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu>] On Behalf Of Stefaan
>          > > > > Vermeulen
>          > > > > Sent: Monday, 23 February 2009 9:44 PM
>          > > > > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
>          > > > > Subject: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: Delivery selection & Schedule
>         selection in
>          > > > > Extended Notif. Config.
>          > > > >
>          > > > >
>          > > > > Rick,
>          > > > >
>          > > > > Thanks for the answer.
>          > > > > Like you said, combination of bad naming of parameters
>         and more
>          > > > > posibilities.
>          > > > >
>          > > > > The previous screen-shot was indeed related to a
>         initial date for a
>          > delta.
>          > > > > After that I executed it again and got a number of selected
>          > notifications.
>          > > > > But in the end I got the very helpfull message.
>          > > > > 'Unable to sent 000000 messages due to errors'.
>          > > > >
>          > > > > I'm still wrestling to get a message in /nSCOT.
>          > > > > It seems that also the users telephone number has to be
>         filled in to
>          > avoid
>          > > > > an error ?
>          > > > >
>          > > > > The subscription part is that Ok(attachment)? in you're
>         opinion ? for
>          > a
>          > > > > plain SAPGui on ECC6 with a outlook mail server ?
>          > > > >
>          > > > > I used also used swn_selsen_test to cast some light to
>         the problem,
>          > without
>          > > > > much succes.
>          > > > > Even my filter of one specific task gives about 50000
>         items selected.
>          > > > >
>          > > > > I'm afraid that debugging will be necessary
>          > > > >
>          > > > > Txs,
>          > > > > S.
>          > > > >
>          > > > > 2009/2/20 Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com
>         <mailto:rbakker at gmail.com>>
>          > > > > > Hello,
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > > I haven't encountered that warning in your attachment:
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > > Filter YTIB_DELTA does not have a time stamp
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > > but I guess it means that it's try to apply a delta
>          > > > > > while it doesn't have a baseline time. It could be
>          > > > > > that it'll only give that warning the first time.
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > > regards
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > > Rick Bakker
>          > > > > > Hanabi Technology
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > > On 2/20/09, Stefaan Vermeulen
>         <stefaan.vermeulen at gmail.com
>         <mailto:stefaan.vermeulen at gmail.com>> wrote:
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > > > Hi all,
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > > I took the time to search trough the sap-help,
>         group archives and
>          > sdn
>          > > > > blogs,
>          > > > > > > without specific answers to this question.
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > > Although I'm quite familiar with the SAP-logic it
>         stuns me  from
>          > time to
>          > > > > > > time how one can create something complicated for
>         simple things
>          > like
>          > > > > > > scheduling.
>          > > > > > > I'm used to the scheduling with rswuwfml2( I don't
>         see regarding
>          > > > > scheduling
>          > > > > > > what was wrong with these parameters)
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > > Can someone explain me in a simple way how to use
>         these 3
>          > parameters in
>          > > > > > > combination and how they influence each other ?
>          > > > > > > -Schedule selection.
>          > > > > > > -Delivery schedule
>          > > > > > > -The scheduling of the program SWN_SELSEN
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > > I kept it simple regarding these config and
>         selected every day of
>          > the
>          > > > > week
>          > > > > > > from 06:00 to 17:00.
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > > The only thing I want to do is ; send a few new
>         created work-items
>          > to
>          > > > > > > outlook.
>          > > > > > > I'm fumbling around with SWN_SELSEN_TEST with a
>         DELTA filter but
>          > (first)
>          > > > > > > without restrictions on TASK in filter.
>          > > > > > > I don't get a clear view of the problem in
>          > SWN_SELSEN_TEST.(attachment)
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > > Thanks,
>          > > > > > > Stefaan.
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > >
>          > > > > > > _______________________________________________
>          > > > > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
>          > > > > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
>          > > > > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > >
>          > > > > > _______________________________________________
>          > > > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
>          > > > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
>          > > > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>          > > > > >
>          > > > >
>          > > > >
>          > > > > _______________________________________________
>          > > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
>          > > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
>          > > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>          > > > >
>          > > > >
>          > > >
>          > > _______________________________________________
>          > > SAP-WUG mailing list
>          > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
>          > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>          > >
>          >
>          >
>          > _______________________________________________
>          > SAP-WUG mailing list
>          > SAP-WUG at mit.edu <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
>          > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>          >
>          >
>         _______________________________________________
>         SAP-WUG mailing list
>         SAP-WUG at mit.edu <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
>         http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     SAP-WUG mailing list
>     SAP-WUG at mit.edu <mailto:SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
>     http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This body part will be downloaded on demand.



More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list