[LIKELY JUNK]Re: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: Delivery selection & Schedule selection in Extended Notif. Config.

Fri Feb 27 04:10:49 EST 2009

Rick,

That's what I did, I receive an error because this function is calling a BSP
URL which doens't exist and I don't need or can't create.
The warning message about phone or e-mail is not related to this error.

I just wonder what you have configured as template and if that template is
also related to the delivery type, that is in my default config the case.

kind regards & Thanks for the reaction.

2009/2/27 Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com>

> Stefaan,
>
> It could be a knock-on effect. If I were you I'd follow the debugger
> into SWN_CALL_BSP to see where the error is (maybe you have, but you
> haven't shown it) and I'd investigate what's causing the telephone
> number messages.
> The smoke may lead you to the fire.
>
> regards
> Rick Bakker
> Hanabi Technology
>
>  On 2/27/09, Stefaan Vermeulen <stefaan.vermeulen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Jocelyn, Ramki,
> >
> > We're talking about different things I think.
> > I'm just trying to set up a this in a standard environment : ECC6 / SAP
> GUI
> > / Outlook & that's it.
> >
> > I don't understand why I'm blocked with this error related to BSP (which
> we
> > don't use).
> >
> > kind regards,
> > Stefaan.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2009/2/27 Dart, Jocelyn <jocelyn.dart at sap.com>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Folks, there is a BSP application used for the Message Template - you
> can
> > see the name in that section of SWNCONFIG.
> > > It's used to build the layout of the reminder.
> > > Regards,
> > > Jocelyn
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> >
> > > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Stefaan
> > Vermeulen
> > > Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2009 10:13 PM
> > >
> > > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > > Subject: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: Delivery
> > selection & Schedule selection in Extended Notif. Config.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Rick,
> > >
> > > Not really, I presume it's not about e-mail addresses or phone numbers,
> > but because of not having a BSP template or active protal, more in that
> > region.
> > >
> > > kr,S;
> > >
> > >
> > > 2009/2/26 Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Did you look what's happening within fm SWN_CALL_BSP during debug
> > > > to see why it's "Unable to determine" e-mail addresses and telephone
> > numbers?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > Rick Bakker
> > > > Hanabi Technology
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2/25/09, Griffiths, Mark <mark.griffiths at sap.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > That error message sometimes results from some of the SWN* BSP
> > applications
> > > > > not being activated in transaction SICF.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hope this helps,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mark
> > > > >
> > > > > SAP UK
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > > > > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Stefaan
> > > > > Vermeulen
> > > > > Sent: 25 February 2009 15:57
> > > > > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > > > > Subject: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: Delivery selection &
> > Schedule
> > > > > selection in Extended Notif. Config.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Rick and Jocelyn for the extra info,
> > > > >
> > > > > I narrowed my problem down to the sending part of  SWN_SELSEN.
> > > > > Message SWN 032 seems to be the killer here.
> > > > > By debugging it seems a call function that uses a template related
> to
> > BSP
> > > > > produces the error.
> > > > > message SWN 032.
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought solving this by creating another delivery type not
> related
> > to the
> > > > > template, but it seems this field( BSP-URL) has to be filled up.
> > > > >
> > > > > What am I still missing ?
> > > > >
> > > > > kind regards,
> > > > > Stefaan.
> > > > > In attachment related prints
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2009/2/24 Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com>
> > > > > > Stefaan,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Stefaan,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How many entries do you have in table SWN_NOTIF? That's
> > > > > > the table filled by the Selection process and read by
> > > > > > the Delivery process.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Because you haven't been able to send any, maybe they're
> > > > > > piling up. And maybe when you first ran it you didn't
> > > > > > have a very restrictive filter in place? This could explain
> > > > > > why it's showing 56K notifications selected.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I tried removing the telephone number from a user, the
> notification
> > > > > > still made it to SOST.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards
> > > > > > Rick Bakker
> > > > > > Hanabi Technology
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2/23/09, Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Stefaan,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 'Unable to send 000000 messages due to errors'
> > > > > > > That's good news.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "It seems that also the users telephone number has to be filled
> in
> > to
> > > > > > > avoid an error"
> > > > > > > I find that very unlikely. I'll have to try that. I suspect all
> my
> > users
> > > > > > > have telephone numbers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "The subscription part is that Ok(attachment)? in your opinion
> "
> > > > > > > Yes.  Well, it's the same as mine.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm not sure why it's picking up 50K messages, SLG1 is
> > > > > > > a good idea. Or do some debugging - a good way to learn
> > > > > > > about the internals.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > regards
> > > > > > > Rick Bakker
> > > > > > > Hanabi Technology
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2/23/09, Dart, Jocelyn <jocelyn.dart at sap.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Stefan,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Try using transaction SLG1 when you get errors ... you will
> find
> > logs
> > > > > giving
> > > > > > > > more details.
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > Jocelyn
> > > > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > > > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > > > > > > > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of
> > Stefaan
> > > > > > > > Vermeulen
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, 23 February 2009 9:44 PM
> > > > > > > > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > > > > > > > Subject: [LIKELY JUNK]Re: Delivery selection & Schedule
> > selection in
> > > > > > > > Extended Notif. Config.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Rick,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for the answer.
> > > > > > > > Like you said, combination of bad naming of parameters and
> more
> > > > > > > > posibilities.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The previous screen-shot was indeed related to a initial date
> > for a
> > > > > delta.
> > > > > > > > After that I executed it again and got a number of selected
> > > > > notifications.
> > > > > > > > But in the end I got the very helpfull message.
> > > > > > > > 'Unable to sent 000000 messages due to errors'.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm still wrestling to get a message in /nSCOT.
> > > > > > > > It seems that also the users telephone number has to be
> filled
> > in to
> > > > > avoid
> > > > > > > > an error ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The subscription part is that Ok(attachment)? in you're
> opinion
> > ? for
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > plain SAPGui on ECC6 with a outlook mail server ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I used also used swn_selsen_test to cast some light to the
> > problem,
> > > > > without
> > > > > > > > much succes.
> > > > > > > > Even my filter of one specific task gives about 50000 items
> > selected.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm afraid that debugging will be necessary
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Txs,
> > > > > > > > S.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2009/2/20 Rick Bakker <rbakker at gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I haven't encountered that warning in your attachment:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Filter YTIB_DELTA does not have a time stamp
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > but I guess it means that it's try to apply a delta
> > > > > > > > > while it doesn't have a baseline time. It could be
> > > > > > > > > that it'll only give that warning the first time.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > regards
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Rick Bakker
> > > > > > > > > Hanabi Technology
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 2/20/09, Stefaan Vermeulen <stefaan.vermeulen at gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I took the time to search trough the sap-help, group
> > archives and
> > > > > sdn
> > > > > > > > blogs,
> > > > > > > > > > without specific answers to this question.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Although I'm quite familiar with the SAP-logic it stuns
> me
> > from
> > > > > time to
> > > > > > > > > > time how one can create something complicated for simple
> > things
> > > > > like
> > > > > > > > > > scheduling.
> > > > > > > > > > I'm used to the scheduling with rswuwfml2( I don't see
> > regarding
> > > > > > > > scheduling
> > > > > > > > > > what was wrong with these parameters)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Can someone explain me in a simple way how to use these 3
> > > > > parameters in
> > > > > > > > > > combination and how they influence each other ?
> > > > > > > > > > -Schedule selection.
> > > > > > > > > > -Delivery schedule
> > > > > > > > > > -The scheduling of the program SWN_SELSEN
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I kept it simple regarding these config and selected
> every
> > day of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > week
> > > > > > > > > > from 06:00 to 17:00.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The only thing I want to do is ; send a few new created
> > work-items
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > outlook.
> > > > > > > > > > I'm fumbling around with SWN_SELSEN_TEST with a DELTA
> filter
> > but
> > > > > (first)
> > > > > > > > > > without restrictions on TASK in filter.
> > > > > > > > > > I don't get a clear view of the problem in
> > > > > SWN_SELSEN_TEST.(attachment)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > Stefaan.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > > > > > > >
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > > > > > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > > > > > >
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > > > > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > > > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20090227/e71a1382/attachment.htm