Work item to call an enhancement

[Gavin Mooney]

Hi Sandy - I agree, the only problem is that we're not using the UWL here.

On 17/09/2008, Sandy <maorriyan.santoso at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Gavin.
> If you execute your work item in UWL, it will render as an attachment.
> It won't execute in paralel with primary method.
> User can execute secondary method/ attachment as many as they want
>
> 2008/9/17 Gavin Mooney <gavinmooney at gmail.com>
>
>> Hi Sandy,
>>
>> The enhancement shouldn't always be executed - it should only be executed
>> if the user chooses to execute it. I think a secondary method would always
>> be called?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gavin
>>
>>
>>   On 17/09/2008, Sandy <maorriyan.santoso at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Gavin.
>>> Hopefully I am not miss interpret your question.
>>> So your main requirement is the enhancement need to be executed as many
>>> as user wants without affecting current work item that has multiple BOR.
>>> Can you just put the enhancement in secondary method?
>>>
>>> 2008/9/17 Gavin Mooney <gavinmooney at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>>  Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I have a requirement for a work item. It needs to have a link to a
>>>> couple of BOR objects (that's fine - we can just bind them in) and also a
>>>> link to a custom enhancement. The users may not need to use all of these
>>>> links, but they have to have the option should they need to. To call the
>>>> enhancement we could use the method on the work item task but the problem is
>>>> that if we did it this way then the enhancement would be called any time the
>>>> user executes the work item, and many users seem to execute work items
>>>> without realising it by double clicking to display them (rather than
>>>> selecting the work item from the list and clicking display).
>>>>
>>>> Is there an easy way around this? We could make the work item a decision
>>>> task where if the user wants to call the enhancement they select that option
>>>> and the workflow calls the enhancement in the subsequent step. The problem
>>>> with that is if the user clicks to execute the enhancement and then wants to
>>>> go back to view the objects that we're binding in. It just all seems to get
>>>> a bit messy.
>>>>
>>>> Hope I'm missing something obvious!
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Gavin
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>>>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080917/72716453/attachment.htm