Work item to call an enhancement

Sandy maorriyan.santoso at gmail.com
Wed Sep 17 04:30:56 EDT 2008


Hi Gavin.
If you execute your work item in UWL, it will render as an attachment.
It won't execute in paralel with primary method.
User can execute secondary method/ attachment as many as they want

2008/9/17 Gavin Mooney <gavinmooney at gmail.com>

> Hi Sandy,
>
> The enhancement shouldn't always be executed - it should only be executed
> if the user chooses to execute it. I think a secondary method would always
> be called?
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>
>
> On 17/09/2008, Sandy <maorriyan.santoso at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Gavin.
>> Hopefully I am not miss interpret your question.
>> So your main requirement is the enhancement need to be executed as many as
>> user wants without affecting current work item that has multiple BOR.
>> Can you just put the enhancement in secondary method?
>>
>> 2008/9/17 Gavin Mooney <gavinmooney at gmail.com>
>>
>>>  Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> I have a requirement for a work item. It needs to have a link to a couple
>>> of BOR objects (that's fine - we can just bind them in) and also a link to a
>>> custom enhancement. The users may not need to use all of these links, but
>>> they have to have the option should they need to. To call the enhancement we
>>> could use the method on the work item task but the problem is that if we did
>>> it this way then the enhancement would be called any time the user executes
>>> the work item, and many users seem to execute work items without realising
>>> it by double clicking to display them (rather than selecting the work item
>>> from the list and clicking display).
>>>
>>> Is there an easy way around this? We could make the work item a decision
>>> task where if the user wants to call the enhancement they select that option
>>> and the workflow calls the enhancement in the subsequent step. The problem
>>> with that is if the user clicks to execute the enhancement and then wants to
>>> go back to view the objects that we're binding in. It just all seems to get
>>> a bit messy.
>>>
>>> Hope I'm missing something obvious!
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gavin
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080917/6f1d5961/attachment.htm


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list