Performance with 4.6C and ECC6

[Sample, Rick]

Mike,
 
I am sure Management / BASIS will take the standard recommendations for
hardware. So, backend stuff is not concerned for this request. 
 
So, more on the App process. 
Wf starts. Takes X time to process task XYZ, ...
 
We won't have the Jave stack installed from my understanding, so that is
out of the picture. 
The only thing that comes to mind on performance is the new XML changes.
But all our apps will continue to use the tables vs. XML. 
 
I hear that ECC6 is aprox 30% slower that 4.6C. Don't know how that
number keeps coming up, but like comparing apples to oranges me thinks. 
 
Thanks,
Rick
 


________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Mike Gambier
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:34 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: Performance with 4.6C and ECC6


Rick,
 
We're doing the same at the moment.
 
Are you focusing on the Basis side of things (e.g. like 'buffer gets' on
the db, database locks) or the Application/Business Process area (e.g.
event delivery, deadlines etc) or both?
 
Mike GT



________________________________


Subject: Performance with 4.6C and ECC6
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:36:21 -0500
From: Rick.Sample at graybar.com
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
CC: rick.sample at graybar.com



We are preparing to upgrade 4.6c to ECC6. I have been tasked to do a
"performance compare" between the two systems for WF relegated items.
 
Anyone have any tools, methods, etc. to do this type of performance
checks? I am not sure as to what to compare or how.
 
 
 
Rick Sample | SAP Business Workflow Developer
Office (314) 573-5822 | Mobile (314) 952-2273 | rick.sample at graybar.com 
www.graybar.com <http://www.graybar.com/>  - Graybar Works to Your
Advantage 
 

________________________________

Get Hotmail on your mobile from Vodafone Try it Now!
<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354028/direct/01/>  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080912/220b4d12/attachment.htm