RFC error in SWEQADM - Event Delivery

[Mike Pokraka]

Hi Mike,

I don't recall seeing the post you mention, but I've learnt over the years
that it's good to generate new versions along the way. I've also learnt
that whenever I encounter a WF corruption it's quicker to not waste time
researching but just copy and redo an older version or rebuild the
workflow.

By staying in the same SWDD session and switching between flows you can
copy/paste the individual steps from one WF to another and the whole
process is not as painful as it sounds.

However I would be interested in hearing if there is another way to
correct dodgy templates...

Cheers,
Mike

On Thu, July 17, 2008 11:16 am, Mike Gambier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can someone remind of the trick to fix the 'This node violates the block
> structure required' (WD:344) syntax error in WF definitions in ECC 6?
>
> I tried the usual 'SWDD->Extras->Special Functions->Block Correction'
> approach but as explained in OSS Message 1077505 I get the STEP_NOT_FOUND
> dump. The nodes that SWDD is complaining about are void/blank nodes.
>
> I'm pretty sure someone here mentioned an SW* Transaction that could bump
> the definition and solve this, but I have no desire to trawl through all
> of the posts to find it...
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike GT
> _________________________________________________________________
> 100’s of Nikon cameras to be won with Live Search
> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/101719808/direct/01/_______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>