Workitems in waiting state for 2 days

[Mark Williams]

Yes, there are 4 header lines and the first lines has the status I1009 with
the description as "Held". What should be done in this case.

Mark

2008/12/14 Keohan, Susan <keohan at ll.mit.edu>

>  Hi Mark,
>
>
>
> Try the backend transaction BBP_PD to see if the object is on hold.
>
> With the sporadic nature of the instances you are talking about, it sounds
> like a business document issue to me.
>
>
> Good luck,
> Sue
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Susan R. Keohan
>
> SAP Workflow Specialist
>
> MIT Lincoln Laboratory
>
> 244 Wood Street
>
> LI-200
>
> Lexington, MA. 02420
>
> Phone: 781-981-3561
>
> Fax:   781-981-1607
>
> keohan at ll.mit.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] *On
> Behalf Of *Mark Williams
> *Sent:* Sunday, December 14, 2008 5:55 PM
> *To:* SAP Workflow Users' Group
> *Subject:* Re: Workitems in waiting state for 2 days
>
>
>
> It is a workflow. Where do I go to check if the triggering object is in
> Hold status. Do you think any of the SRM service jobs may have stopped
> causing this problem.
>
>
>
> Mark
>
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Ramki Maley <rmaley at erpworkflow.com>
> wrote:
>
> Is it a workitem of a step(dialog/background) type or the top level
> workitem (workflow) that is in Wait status? If it is  workflow, check if
> the triggering object is in 'Hold' status.
>
> Cheers,
> Ramki.
>
>
> Mark Williams wrote:
> > Could anyone tell me how to push the workitems from waiting state to
> > Ready. In the past two days there are some SRM workflows get triggerred
> > and go into waiting state though there is no requested start or wait
> > step. Again there are some other instances of the same workflow which
> > are working fine. These have been working fine all along and no changes
> > were made to these workflow atleast in the past 6 months. Its not
> > related to a single user or single workflow. I know of atleast 2
> > workflows which is behaving in this way. Could anyone let me know what
> > could be the problem and how to resolve this. If you need more
> > information, I would be happy to provide.
> >
> >
>
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20081214/13a08566/attachment.htm