Subject: Link to transaction BP in workitem

V Ajay K aveerama at gmail.com
Wed Apr 23 17:15:06 EDT 2008


>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for the response, I have done that still no link in Objects
> and attachments in Work Item preview.  Any clues....?
>
>
> *Responses till now:
> *Ajay,
> Replace the task container "&ATTACHMENTS&" with "&_ADHOC_OBJECTS&".
> Good luck,
>
> Regards,
> Shai Eyal
> SAP Logistics senior consultant
> SAP Workflow specialist
> Mobile: 972-52-5816633
>
> Message: 3
>
> Hi,
>
> When i try to bind the Object with the workitem element &attachment& in
> the
> task, it is showing as below. Please guide me in detail.
> Value of expression '&_WORKITEM.ATTACHMENTS&' cannot be used as the target
> of an assignment Message no. SWF_BND_001012 Diagnosis
>
> Expression? refers to a data object that cannot be changed, for example, a
> constant, a system field, an object attribute, or a method that cannot be
> changed. A binding cannot use this data object as a target.
> Thanks
> Ajay
>
> Message: 5
> Ajay,
>
> If the 'BP' object exists in your workflow, you can add it to your
> workitem
> as an 'attachment'.
> Just bind the object from the workflow container to the &attachments&
> element in your workitem.
>
> The object will then appear in the workitem display as a link, and when
> the
> user clicks on it, the BP's
> default method will be executed (which is usually the 'Display' method).
>
> hope this helps
> Paul
>
> Hi,
>
> How to attach a Link in the workitem to go to certain transaction just by
> clicking on it.
>
> Example: Workflow triggers when i change the BP 100, then it sends a
> workitem to the workflow inbox. But i want a Link in the attachments part
> of the Workitem, Upon clicking on it i want to go to the BP 100 Screen,
> How
> can i do it.
> *Thanks in advance
> --
> Ajay _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>  On 4/23/08, sap-wug-request at mit.edu <sap-wug-request at mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> >        sap-wug at mit.edu
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >        http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >        sap-wug-request at mit.edu
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >        sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >   1. Conatainer holding Rule Agents (Khatawate, Deepak N (ACCENTURE))
> >   2. Subject: Link to transaction BP in workitem (V Ajay K) (Shai Eyal)
> >   3. Re: Pur req-release wrkflw (Florin Wach (gmx))
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:40:41 +0100
> > From: "Khatawate, Deepak N (ACCENTURE)" <Deepak.Khatawate at bp.com>
> > Subject: Conatainer holding Rule Agents
> > To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Message-ID:
> >        <
> > 2019246BF83D0F46A0376FF2A463F7120A2DD72C at BP1XEUEX021-C.bp1.ad.bp.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to capture the Agents determined from the Rule in the Decision
> > task and pass the same as container expression to the SEND MAIL task.
> > Hence my question is, is there any container which holds these Agents
> > determined by Rule in the workflow?
> >
> > 4.6C
> >
> > Regards,
> > Deepak N K
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080423/53f9fce7/attachment-0001.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Shai Eyal <shai.eyal at yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Subject: Link to transaction BP in workitem (V Ajay K)
> > To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> > Message-ID: <713989.32167.qm at web59111.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > Ajay,
> > Replace the task container "&ATTACHMENTS&" with "&_ADHOC_OBJECTS&".
> > Good luck,
> >
> > ?
> > Regards,
> > Shai Eyal
> > SAP Logistics senior consultant
> > SAP Workflow specialist
> > Mobile: 972-52-5816633
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:11:04 -0700
> > From: "V Ajay K" <aveerama at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Subject: Link to transaction BP in workitem
> > To: SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > Message-ID:
> > ??? <7a9b89090804230911w6b89c02dwd68e4f776ea76f3a at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > When i try to bind the Object with the workitem element &attachment& in
> > the
> > task, it is showing as below. Please guide me in detail.
> > Value of expression '&_WORKITEM.ATTACHMENTS&' cannot be used as the
> > target
> > of an assignment Message no. SWF_BND_001012 Diagnosis
> >
> > Expression? refers to a data object that cannot be changed, for example,
> > a
> > constant, a system field, an object attribute, or a method that cannot
> > be
> > changed. A binding cannot use this data object as a target.
> > Thanks
> > Ajay
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:34:50 +1100
> > From: Paul.Bakker at osr.treasury.qld.gov.au
> > Subject: Re: Link to transaction BP in workitem
> > To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Message-ID:
> > ? ? ? <
> >
> > OFB4AA7087.724FB295-ON4A257434.0002B1C3-CA257434.000314F0 at treasury.qld.gov.au
> > >
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Ajay,
> >
> > If the 'BP' object exists in your workflow, you can add it to your
> > workitem
> > as an 'attachment'.
> > Just bind the object from the workflow container to the &attachments&
> > element in your workitem.
> >
> > The object will then appear in the workitem display as a link, and when
> > the
> > user clicks on it, the BP's
> > default method will be executed (which is usually the 'Display' method).
> >
> > hope this helps
> > Paul
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? "V Ajay K"
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? <aveerama at gmail.c
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? om>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > To
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? Sent by:? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sap-wug at mit.edu
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? sap-wug-bounces at m? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > cc
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? it.edu
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
> > Subject
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Link to transaction BP in workitem
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? 23/04/2008 08:59
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? AM
> >
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? Please respond to
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "SAP Workflow
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Users' Group"
> > ? ? ? ? ? ? <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > How to attach a Link in the workitem to go to certain transaction just
> > by
> > clicking on it.
> >
> > Example: Workflow triggers when i change the BP 100, then it sends a
> > workitem to the workflow inbox. But i want a Link in the attachments
> > part
> > of the Workitem, Upon clicking on it i want to go to the BP 100 Screen,
> > How
> > can i do it.
> > *Thanks in advance
> > --
> > Ajay _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> > --
> > Ajay K Veeramaneni
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080423/c2dfbd16/attachment.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> > End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 41, Issue 76
> > ***************************************
> >
> >
> > Send instant messages to your online friends
> > http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080423/4052be87/attachment-0001.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:28:34 +0200
> > From: "Florin Wach (gmx)" <florin.wach at gmx.net>
> > Subject: Re: Pur req-release wrkflw
> > To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Message-ID: <004301c8a580$9e8655e0$09010a0a at SI.local>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > welcome...
> >
> > I would use of copy of the standard template anyway, but it seems that
> > the one having the higher number, is the newer one, even though they look
> > just the same to me.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Florin
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: John A Haworth
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 12:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: Pur req-release wrkflw
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks again for your fast response & info.
> >
> > Should I be using 00000038 or 20000077?
> >
> > John
> >
> > CSC Computer Sciences Limited
> > Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
> > GU11 1PZ, UK
> > Registered in England No: 0963578
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
> > delivery.
> > NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC
> > to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
> > or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
> > purpose.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >        "Florin Wach" <florin.wach at gmx.net>
> >        Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> >        23/04/2008 10:43 Please respond to
> >              "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >
> >
> >       To "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >              cc
> >              Subject Re: Pur req-release wrkflw
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jup,
> >
> > this seems to be not working a 100% as designed.
> >
> > I usually deselect the SignificantlyChanged event as the terminating
> > event in the workflow pattern (as a copy from the SAP's original), as that
> > event is always accompanied by the .Rejection_start.
> >
> > Also the (newer?) template WS20000077 has the same thing.
> >
> > If you'd like to avoid that, you could also use a check-function module
> > in the instance coupling of the task TS20000159 that avoids the event
> > .SignificantlyChanged of beeing processed. Or you'd add a info-rejection as
> > the first step in the rejection flow.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Florin
> >
> >
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > > Datum: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:22:54 +0100
> > > Von: John A Haworth <jhoworth at csc.com>
> > > An: "SAP Workflow Users\' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > > Betreff: Pur req-release wrkflw
> >
> > > Thanks for that info.
> > >
> > > Continuing on the same workflow. I have an issue with the way this
> > seems
> > > to be working, could someone please comment?
> > >
> > > It seems that when the Pur Req is created and saved, WS0000038 is
> > > triggered ok, and the approve request is sent to the correct
> > Responsible
> > > Agent. If that agent then Approves the PReq, the workflow works
> > correctly
> > > and the initiator is informed via a wflw task from WS0000038. But if
> > the
> > > agents rejects the Preq, then event 'SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED' is raised
> > which
> > > cancels down the initial workflow (WS0000038), together with a second
> > > event  REJECTION_START   which then triggers a new single step
> > workflow
> > > (WS65400027)
> > >
> > > This doesnt look correct, as cancelling down the initial workflow,
> > means
> > > that the task 'Negative Confirmation' in WS0000038 doesnt get touched
> > and
> > > therefore isnt sent to the initiator (whereas the positive
> > confirmation
> > > task is run when the Agent approves)
> > >
> > > WS65400027 then waits for the event REJECTION_STOP as a terminating
> > event,
> > > but the initiator is never informed.
> > >
> > > Many Thanks
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > CSC Computer Sciences Limited
> > > Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot,
> > Hampshire,
> > > GU11 1PZ, UK
> > > Registered in England No: 0963578
> > >
> > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> > please
> > > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake
> > in
> > > delivery.
> > > NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC
> > to
> > > any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
> > agreement
> > > or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for
> > such
> > > purpose.
> > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Florin Wach (gmx)" <florin.wach at gmx.net>
> > > Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > > 21/04/2008 17:39
> > > Please respond to
> > > "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > >
> > >
> > > To
> > > "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > > cc
> > >
> > > Subject
> > > Re: user exit on Pur req-release wrkflw
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi John,
> > >
> > > if the box "Assigned agent" is left blank, der Task's standard role
> > > resolution is used, which is, what's exactly happening there.
> > >
> > > Look at the Task definition of TS... under "Rules".
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > > Florin
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: John A Haworth
> > > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 4:49 PM
> > > Subject: user exit on Pur req-release wrkflw
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I am looking at a clients already created workflows. One is the
> > purchase
> > > requisition release standard workflow WS00000038. They have the
> > purchase
> > > reqs configured to use the LXM06U12 Customer enhancement to look in a
> > > customer table for the approver name, that all looks ok.
> > > But the first step in the workflow that sends the approval request to
> > the
> > > approver, has no entry in the 'Responsible Agents' entry box. Yet the
> > > workflow seems to be sending to the right person?? Surely this is not
> > > right, and my mental block thats happening more frequently is not
> > helping!
> > > Any advice?
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > CSC Computer Sciences Limited
> > > Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot,
> > Hampshire,
> > > GU11 1PZ, UK
> > > Registered in England No: 0963578
> > >
> > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> > please
> > > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake
> > in
> > > delivery.
> > > NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC
> > to
> > > any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
> > agreement
> > > or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for
> > such
> > > purpose.
> > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080423/2c9d8e5e/attachment.htm
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> >
> > End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 41, Issue 77
> > ***************************************
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ajay K Veeramaneni




-- 
Ajay K Veeramaneni
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080423/39ca2cf0/attachment.htm


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list