SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 41, Issue 77
V Ajay K
aveerama at gmail.com
Wed Apr 23 17:05:02 EDT 2008
Hi,
Thanks a lot for the response, I have done that still no link in Objects and
attachments in Work Item preview. Any clues....?
*Responses till now:
*Ajay,
Replace the task container "&ATTACHMENTS&" with "&_ADHOC_OBJECTS&".
Good luck,
Regards,
Shai Eyal
SAP Logistics senior consultant
SAP Workflow specialist
Mobile: 972-52-5816633
Message: 3
Hi,
When i try to bind the Object with the workitem element &attachment& in the
task, it is showing as below. Please guide me in detail.
Value of expression '&_WORKITEM.ATTACHMENTS&' cannot be used as the target
of an assignment Message no. SWF_BND_001012 Diagnosis
Expression? refers to a data object that cannot be changed, for example, a
constant, a system field, an object attribute, or a method that cannot be
changed. A binding cannot use this data object as a target.
Thanks
Ajay
Message: 5
Ajay,
If the 'BP' object exists in your workflow, you can add it to your workitem
as an 'attachment'.
Just bind the object from the workflow container to the &attachments&
element in your workitem.
The object will then appear in the workitem display as a link, and when the
user clicks on it, the BP's
default method will be executed (which is usually the 'Display' method).
hope this helps
Paul
Hi,
How to attach a Link in the workitem to go to certain transaction just by
clicking on it.
Example: Workflow triggers when i change the BP 100, then it sends a
workitem to the workflow inbox. But i want a Link in the attachments part
of the Workitem, Upon clicking on it i want to go to the BP 100 Screen, How
can i do it.
*Thanks in advance
--
Ajay _______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
On 4/23/08, sap-wug-request at mit.edu <sap-wug-request at mit.edu> wrote:
>
> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> sap-wug at mit.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Conatainer holding Rule Agents (Khatawate, Deepak N (ACCENTURE))
> 2. Subject: Link to transaction BP in workitem (V Ajay K) (Shai Eyal)
> 3. Re: Pur req-release wrkflw (Florin Wach (gmx))
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:40:41 +0100
> From: "Khatawate, Deepak N (ACCENTURE)" <Deepak.Khatawate at bp.com>
> Subject: Conatainer holding Rule Agents
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <
> 2019246BF83D0F46A0376FF2A463F7120A2DD72C at BP1XEUEX021-C.bp1.ad.bp.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to capture the Agents determined from the Rule in the Decision
> task and pass the same as container expression to the SEND MAIL task.
> Hence my question is, is there any container which holds these Agents
> determined by Rule in the workflow?
>
> 4.6C
>
> Regards,
> Deepak N K
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080423/53f9fce7/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Shai Eyal <shai.eyal at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Subject: Link to transaction BP in workitem (V Ajay K)
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Message-ID: <713989.32167.qm at web59111.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Ajay,
> Replace the task container "&ATTACHMENTS&" with "&_ADHOC_OBJECTS&".
> Good luck,
>
> ?
> Regards,
> Shai Eyal
> SAP Logistics senior consultant
> SAP Workflow specialist
> Mobile: 972-52-5816633
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:11:04 -0700
> From: "V Ajay K" <aveerama at gmail.com>
> Subject: Subject: Link to transaction BP in workitem
> To: SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> Message-ID:
> ??? <7a9b89090804230911w6b89c02dwd68e4f776ea76f3a at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> When i try to bind the Object with the workitem element &attachment& in
> the
> task, it is showing as below. Please guide me in detail.
> Value of expression '&_WORKITEM.ATTACHMENTS&' cannot be used as the target
> of an assignment Message no. SWF_BND_001012 Diagnosis
>
> Expression? refers to a data object that cannot be changed, for example, a
> constant, a system field, an object attribute, or a method that cannot be
> changed. A binding cannot use this data object as a target.
> Thanks
> Ajay
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:34:50 +1100
> From: Paul.Bakker at osr.treasury.qld.gov.au
> Subject: Re: Link to transaction BP in workitem
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> ? ? ? <
>
> OFB4AA7087.724FB295-ON4A257434.0002B1C3-CA257434.000314F0 at treasury.qld.gov.au
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Ajay,
>
> If the 'BP' object exists in your workflow, you can add it to your
> workitem
> as an 'attachment'.
> Just bind the object from the workflow container to the &attachments&
> element in your workitem.
>
> The object will then appear in the workitem display as a link, and when
> the
> user clicks on it, the BP's
> default method will be executed (which is usually the 'Display' method).
>
> hope this helps
> Paul
> ? ? ? ? ? ? "V Ajay K"
> ? ? ? ? ? ? <aveerama at gmail.c
> ? ? ? ? ? ? om>? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? To
> ? ? ? ? ? ? Sent by:? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sap-wug at mit.edu
> ? ? ? ? ? ? sap-wug-bounces at m? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? cc
> ? ? ? ? ? ? it.edu
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Subject
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Link to transaction BP in workitem
> ? ? ? ? ? ? 23/04/2008 08:59
> ? ? ? ? ? ? AM
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? Please respond to
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "SAP Workflow
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Users' Group"
> ? ? ? ? ? ? <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> How to attach a Link in the workitem to go to certain transaction just by
> clicking on it.
>
> Example: Workflow triggers when i change the BP 100, then it sends a
> workitem to the workflow inbox. But i want a Link in the attachments part
> of the Workitem, Upon clicking on it i want to go to the BP 100 Screen,
> How
> can i do it.
> *Thanks in advance
> --
> Ajay _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
> --
> Ajay K Veeramaneni
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080423/c2dfbd16/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 41, Issue 76
> ***************************************
>
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080423/4052be87/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:28:34 +0200
> From: "Florin Wach (gmx)" <florin.wach at gmx.net>
> Subject: Re: Pur req-release wrkflw
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID: <004301c8a580$9e8655e0$09010a0a at SI.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> welcome...
>
> I would use of copy of the standard template anyway, but it seems that the
> one having the higher number, is the newer one, even though they look just
> the same to me.
>
> Best wishes,
> Florin
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John A Haworth
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 12:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Pur req-release wrkflw
>
>
>
> Thanks again for your fast response & info.
>
> Should I be using 00000038 or 20000077?
>
> John
>
> CSC Computer Sciences Limited
> Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
> GU11 1PZ, UK
> Registered in England No: 0963578
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
> delivery.
> NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to
> any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or
> government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
> purpose.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> "Florin Wach" <florin.wach at gmx.net>
> Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> 23/04/2008 10:43 Please respond to
> "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>
>
> To "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> cc
> Subject Re: Pur req-release wrkflw
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jup,
>
> this seems to be not working a 100% as designed.
>
> I usually deselect the SignificantlyChanged event as the terminating event
> in the workflow pattern (as a copy from the SAP's original), as that event
> is always accompanied by the .Rejection_start.
>
> Also the (newer?) template WS20000077 has the same thing.
>
> If you'd like to avoid that, you could also use a check-function module in
> the instance coupling of the task TS20000159 that avoids the event
> .SignificantlyChanged of beeing processed. Or you'd add a info-rejection as
> the first step in the rejection flow.
>
> Best wishes,
> Florin
>
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:22:54 +0100
> > Von: John A Haworth <jhoworth at csc.com>
> > An: "SAP Workflow Users\' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Betreff: Pur req-release wrkflw
>
> > Thanks for that info.
> >
> > Continuing on the same workflow. I have an issue with the way this seems
> > to be working, could someone please comment?
> >
> > It seems that when the Pur Req is created and saved, WS0000038 is
> > triggered ok, and the approve request is sent to the correct Responsible
> > Agent. If that agent then Approves the PReq, the workflow works
> correctly
> > and the initiator is informed via a wflw task from WS0000038. But if the
> > agents rejects the Preq, then event 'SIGNIFICANTLYCHANGED' is raised
> which
> > cancels down the initial workflow (WS0000038), together with a second
> > event REJECTION_START which then triggers a new single step workflow
> > (WS65400027)
> >
> > This doesnt look correct, as cancelling down the initial workflow, means
> > that the task 'Negative Confirmation' in WS0000038 doesnt get touched
> and
> > therefore isnt sent to the initiator (whereas the positive confirmation
> > task is run when the Agent approves)
> >
> > WS65400027 then waits for the event REJECTION_STOP as a terminating
> event,
> > but the initiator is never informed.
> >
> > Many Thanks
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > CSC Computer Sciences Limited
> > Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
> > GU11 1PZ, UK
> > Registered in England No: 0963578
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
> > delivery.
> > NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC
> to
> > any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
> agreement
> > or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
> > purpose.
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Florin Wach (gmx)" <florin.wach at gmx.net>
> > Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > 21/04/2008 17:39
> > Please respond to
> > "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >
> >
> > To
> > "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > cc
> >
> > Subject
> > Re: user exit on Pur req-release wrkflw
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> > if the box "Assigned agent" is left blank, der Task's standard role
> > resolution is used, which is, what's exactly happening there.
> >
> > Look at the Task definition of TS... under "Rules".
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Florin
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: John A Haworth
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 4:49 PM
> > Subject: user exit on Pur req-release wrkflw
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I am looking at a clients already created workflows. One is the purchase
> > requisition release standard workflow WS00000038. They have the purchase
> > reqs configured to use the LXM06U12 Customer enhancement to look in a
> > customer table for the approver name, that all looks ok.
> > But the first step in the workflow that sends the approval request to
> the
> > approver, has no entry in the 'Responsible Agents' entry box. Yet the
> > workflow seems to be sending to the right person?? Surely this is not
> > right, and my mental block thats happening more frequently is not
> helping!
> > Any advice?
> >
> > John
> >
> > CSC Computer Sciences Limited
> > Registered Office: Royal Pavilion, Wellesley Road, Aldershot, Hampshire,
> > GU11 1PZ, UK
> > Registered in England No: 0963578
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> > delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
> > delivery.
> > NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC
> to
> > any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
> agreement
> > or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
> > purpose.
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080423/2c9d8e5e/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 41, Issue 77
> ***************************************
>
--
Ajay K Veeramaneni
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080423/a2b40ab4/attachment.htm
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list