SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW vs. SWW_WI_START

[Mike Pokraka]

Nope, the WAPI containers are simple containers. A different animal
altogether, simple containers are just a name-value pair.

data: lt_cont type standard table of swr_cont,
      lv_cont type swr_cont.

lv_cont-element = 'SINGEELEMENT'.
lv_cont-value = 'somevalue'.
append lv_cont to lt_cont.

lv_cont-element = 'MULTIELEMENT'.
lv_cont-value = 'value1'.
append lv_cont to lt_cont.

lv_cont-value = 'value2'.
append lv_cont to lt_cont.

On Wed, April 16, 2008 3:07 pm, Sample, Rick wrote:
> Mike, I tried several different approaches to what I 'think' you are
> saying, but WF still does not start.
> Below is a Y test snip. Can you point out what you mean?
>
> FUNCTION y_test_start_dla_msg.
>   INCLUDE: <cntn01>.
>
>   DATA:
>    container        TYPE swcont OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
>    return_code     TYPE sy-subrc,
>    workitem_id     TYPE swr_struct-workitemid,
>    bapi_return      TYPE bapiret2 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
> *+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>   bapi_return-type    = 'W'.
>   bapi_return-message = '1'.
>   APPEND bapi_return.
>
>   bapi_return-type    = 'S'.
>   bapi_return-message = '2'.
>   APPEND bapi_return.
>
>   swc_set_table container 'BAPI_Return' bapi_return.
>
>   CALL FUNCTION 'SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW'
>        EXPORTING
>             task            = 'TS90000212'
>        IMPORTING
>             return_code     = return_code
>             workitem_id     = workitem_id
>        TABLES
>             input_container = container.
>
> ENDFUNCTION.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> Of Mike Pokraka
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 2:40 AM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: Re: SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW vs. SWW_WI_START
>
> Hi Rick,
> Just repeat the same container element name with different values for
> the
> SAP_WAPI container.
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
> On Tue, April 15, 2008 10:47 pm, Sample, Rick wrote:
>> I forgot that the interface changed for SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW. We
> can
>> no longer pass in 'tables' to this FM?
>>
>> What I need is, to start a WF and pass in TABLES.
>>
>> What are the risks of using SWW_WI_START? Or, how do I pass in tables
> to
>> the
>> new WAPIs?
>>
>> Rick Sample
>> SAP Business Workflow Developer
>> Graybar, Inc.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>