2 DL Notifications (Ravi Dixit)

Mon Apr 14 14:07:21 EDT 2008

Ravi,

It does sounds like a mystery. Few questions that might lead to the problem:
Looking into the manager worklist you should be able to see which deadline he gets. Is it requested end + latest end ?
Is this happening to all employees or only few specific ?
How about substitution - do we have any ? (at employee level off course).
10x,

Regards,
Shai Eyal
SAP Logistics senior consultant
SAP Workflow specialist
Mobile: 972-52-5816633

----- Original Message ----
From: "sap-wug-request at mit.edu" <sap-wug-request at mit.edu>
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 16:30:16
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 41, Issue 39

Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
    sap-wug at mit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    sap-wug-request at mit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
    sap-wug-owner at mit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."

Today's Topics:

  1. Re: 2 DL Notifications (Ravi Dixit)
  2. Deepika Narayanan is out of the office. (Deepika Narayanan)
  3. RE: W4W5INFOUS (Sample, Rick)
  4. BUS2096  (david.s.dittmer at accenture.com)
  5. RE: W4W5INFOUS (Sample, Rick)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 10:25:06 +1000
From: "Ravi Dixit" <dolbydix at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2 DL Notifications
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Message-ID:
    <eb76006c0804131725nb5c9925q1ce0cd937bdcf774 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear Shai

Thanks for your response.

You are right about the RE, it should have been RE not RS, my apologies.

It still does not explain the 2 notifications to the manager of approver.
The set up is Requested End goes to Employee(applicant of Leave), and Latest
End is sent to Manager of approver.

Any input would be much appreciated.

Best Regards
Ravi Dixit

> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Shai Eyal <shai.eyal at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: 2 DL Notifications
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Message-ID: <996779.38046.qm at web59115.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear Ravi,
>
> Request Start means the workitem is created at WAITING status and appears
> in the employee worklist only when Request start is reached. It does not
> send notification. Therefore I can guess you refered to Latest Start. Now,
> Latest Start will never happen if the employee starts processing the
> workitem (which means the status is not READY anymore) even if it does not
> get completed. So this may be the reason. As for the manager receiving two
> notifications - I'd check the Requested End also.
>
> Good luck
>
> Regards,
> Shai Eyal
> SAP Logistics senior consultant
> SAP Workflow specialist
> Mobile: 972-52-5816633
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080414/1eaaf4d3/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:03:36 +0530
From: Deepika Narayanan <deepnara at in.ibm.com>
Subject: Deepika Narayanan is out of the office.
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
    <OF76DC706C.C2DCB099-ON6525742B.000E1018-6525742B.000E1018 at in.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

I will be out of the office starting  14/04/2008 and will not return until
16/04/2008.

I will be out of office till 16/04/2008. For urgent issues kindly  contact
sujith.sr at in.ibm.com or bindhumadhavi at in.ibm.com

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:45:44 -0500
From: "Sample, Rick" <Rick.Sample at gbe.com>
Subject: RE: W4W5INFOUS
To: "Sample, Rick" <Rick.Sample at gbe.com>,    "SAP Workflow Users' Group"
    <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
    <1897E92A96C47648A6574CB9A51C6407A94A61 at SEBEV1PW.graybar.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

One of our ABAP'rs found the FM that sets a lock record flag that raises the event. 
This makes sense. If we do not want an approval process, don't lock record and update 
the record.

Now, what I know is that this must be a config option vs. changing the FM to force the flag to SET.
I don't see this in the config where it used to be for 4..6c. (From what I remember anyway!)

If this rings a bell, could anyone pass along where this config is located?

Thanks!
Rick

________________________________

From: Sample, Rick
Sent: Wed 09-Apr-08 12:19
To: 'SAP Workflow Users' Group'
Subject: RE: W4W5INFOUS

In SWEHR1 we have Person 210 with objtype 'W4W5INFOUS'.

In SWEHR2 we have:
Person 210 REQ W4W5INFOUS-REQUESTED                Nothing in the FM field
Person 210 RQC W4W5INFOUS-REQUESTCANCELLED    Nothing in the FM field

In SWEHR3 we have:
Person 210 REQ W4W5INFOUS-REQUESTED                Nothing in the FM field

>From what I remember, this was all that was need besides linking this obj-event to a custom Wf.

Any help is appreciated...
Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Sample, Rick
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:35 AM
To: Sample, Rick; SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: W4W5INFOUS

We are trying to setup our W-4 WF in ECC6.

>From what I remember in 4.6C, we had to change swehr2 / 3 links, enter an event and use W4W5INFOUS object.
Then the correct obj-event triggered.

We are now on ECC6. I made the same settings but it is not triggering the W4W5INFOUS object-event.

Can someone point me in the right direction pleases?

Rick Sample
SAP Business Workflow Developer
Graybar, Inc.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080414/de34c766/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:28:14 -0500
From: <david.s.dittmer at accenture.com>
Subject: BUS2096 
To: <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
    <833BF50E60C6104CA97181992DC1049002C3C6D2 at AMRXM2101.dir.svc.accenture.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello workflow experts,

I am using business object BUS2096 to create a workflow when an incoming
IDOC creates a debit memo. This workflow is performing correctly when an
IDOC creates a debit memo but it also creates a workflow when a debit
memo is created manually. The user now wants the manual creation
switched off so that the workflow  only takes place on IDOC creation.
Does anybody have any ideas as to how I can switch off the creation of
the manual debit memo?

David.S.Dittmer

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20080414/ca19ab6a/attachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:28:50 -0500
From: "Sample, Rick" <Rick.Sample at gbe.com>
Subject: RE: W4W5INFOUS
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
    <1897E92A96C47648A6574CB9A51C640705C60573 at SEBEV1PW.graybar.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

One of our ABAP'rs found the FM that sets a lock record flag that raises
the event. 
This makes sense. If we do not want an approval process, don't lock
record and update 
the record.

Now, what I know is that this must be a config option vs. changing the
FM to force the flag to SET.
I don't see this in the config where it used to be for 4..6c. (From what
I remember anyway!)

If this rings a bell, could anyone pass along where this config is
located?