Polymorphic classes in workflow?

Gavin Mooney gavinmooney at gmail.com
Tue Jun 26 12:11:37 EDT 2007


Hey Mike,

Alon was having a moan about this back in November (thread "Specifying
Interface as Importing parameter") and as far as I know this is still
not possible in 700.

Actually it looks like Alon asked Jocelyn about it on 21/6 in the
thread "Presentation on Classy Workflows / BOR vs ABAP OO" and we're
still waiting for Jocelyn's reply.

Jocelyn? Any words of wisdom?

Cheers,
Gavin

2007/6/26, Mike Pokraka <asap at workflowconnections.com>:
> Hi Workflowers,
>
> A very technical question: Has anyone tried to use some sort of
> polymorphism with ABAP classes in workflow?
>
> I am working on 620 at the moment and the trouble is that the WF builder
> doesn't let you specify an interface as a class container element type. I
> have even tried to get it to work via inheritance (i.e. binding a subtype
> to it's supertype and vice versa) and having spent most of a day on it
> have had no success whatsoever. It seems that the class you define is the
> class you're stuck with thoughout the WF.
>
> This is rather annoying and negates one of the more useful benefits of
> using classes. Even though I am sitting on a 620 system, I would also be
> interested in any experience on NW04/s because it would be handy to know
> how things work and which direction things will go as we also have upgrade
> plans around the corner.
>
> Any input appreciated.
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>



More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list