Changes to WF Prefix for upgrade

[Alon Raskin]

I don't see any issue with that. In fact it's a nice approach as you can
easily identify if a problem relates to an 'old' or 'new' workflow.

Just because if you are enhancing any existing code which is used by
both 'old' and 'new'. Depending on the changes made (i.e. code changes)
you could impact existing instances of the 'old' workflows...

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Susan R. Keohan
Sent: 22 September 2006 08:24
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Changes to WF Prefix for upgrade

All,

We are upgrading from EBP 3.5 to SRM 5.0, and I am running through
SWU3... I thought it would be 
*nice* to be able to assign a new WF Prefix Number at this point, so
that the new workflows are 
immediately identifiable... but am not sure if there are repercussions
for the old ones.  We do not 
expect them to run, and will not be developing any more of the 'old'
ones (obviously), so I don't 
think there's any harm to setting up a new Prefix.

Thoughts ?  Warnings ?
Thanks,
Sue
-- 
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Developer
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
keohan at ll.mit.edu

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug