Workflow not kicking off in TEST system (Munday,Sherie J.)

Lowe, Henry henry.lowe at logicacmg.com
Thu Sep 7 13:05:08 EDT 2006


I have looked into this again today and the solution was indeed found in
SWU3. The RFC Connection had not been set up properly in that WF-BATCH
had not been given its correct password. Having changed this the
workflow is now triggering fine.

Many thanks for the help on this.

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of sap-wug-request at mit.edu
Sent: 07 September 2006 07:09
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 22, Issue 9

Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
	sap-wug at mit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	sap-wug-request at mit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
	sap-wug-owner at mit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. RE: Performance problem with image displaying (WF Tom)
   2. RE: Application independant workflow ? (Jackson, Rob)
   3. RE: Workflow not kicking off in TEST system (Munday,Sherie J.)
   4. RE: Workflow not kicking off in TEST system (Kjetil Kilhavn)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 12:41:25 -0400
From: "WF Tom" <faq at saportal.net>
Subject: RE: Performance problem with image displaying
To: "'SAP Workflow Users' Group'" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <0ML21M-1GL0Su2nuZ-0002gN at mrelayeu.kundenserver.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Angelo,
 
make sure you have all required container filled. I assume you are using
TS30001128 and not any home-grown transaction? Should be pretty straight
forward, even though it might be more a ArchiveLink question.
 
Ciao,
Torsten

  _____  

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of
Angelo_Besenzoni at sap-consulting.it
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:55 AM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: Performance problem with image displaying



Hi all. 

My problem of performance concerns the displaying of the images through
ArchiveLink. 

If the displaying  is performed through the transaction OAM1 there are
not
found particular  problems. 

If instead the displaying is performed by the link in the workitem, the
time
drastically increases. 

Does anybody deal with the same problem? 

Every your idea will be well pleasant. 

Best regards. 

Angelo. 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060906/ca21e385/a
ttachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:37:27 -0400
From: "Jackson, Rob" <rob.jackson at owenscorning.com>
Subject: RE: Application independant workflow ?
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
	
<427ACF42A625654083439F335586598602A2A8CC at WHQS6200.na.corp.owenscorning.
com>
	
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

We have utilized the 4.7 workflow engine in combination with our own
custom
SAP Business Server Pages application to automate a couple of approval
processes.  The BSP's update custom z-tables in SAP and documents that
are
uploaded get stored in the SAP archives, but retrievable from our
Intranet.
Not sure if this is what you mean by "independent" or not.  I will be
presenting at SAP TechEd on this topic if you are interested.

Rob


Rob Jackson
Owens Corning - Information Systems
Office 419-248-7470
Fax 419-325-3470
email  rob.jackson at owenscorning.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Pokraka [mailto:asap at workflowconnections.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:24 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Re: Application independant workflow ?

Hi Phil,

SAP is regarded one of the best (if not the best) workflow engines out
there, it's biggest drawback is that you need to run SAP apps to take
full
advantage. However I'd still see it as a perfectly useable tool. Amongst
the
biggest strengths are the organizational management and routing
capabilities. Naturally there will be processes which will cross over
into
your SAP systems, which means you're all set to go with minimum
interface
headaches.

You say 200 apps, are you talking separate applications?!?? Or 200
processes. The concept of business object is academic, every process
revolves around one or more objects. So if you want to define a
'MarketingEvent' object, go ahead. An object doesn't need a key, so you
don't even need anything in the database, just create your BO and add
your
methods to form your tasks. Or go one better - this is a perfet
opportunity
to go fully ABAP-Class based.

Other pros for SAP WF is the open architecture - XML, SOAP and various
other
TLAs which all make it (supposedly) interact nicely with other compliant
apps. With the latest NW, you can even mail out PDF forms, have people
fill
them in and receive them back into WF (might address the userid-question
Mark raised). I plan to check this one out at TechEd (See you there,
Sherie).

Concering your 'development effort' concerns... you're going to have
that if
you are replacing a WF system anyway, might as well make it a re-useable
effort.

In short, I say it's perfectly feasible but still depends on the exact
nature of the existing apps.

Cheers,
Mike


On Tue, September 5, 2006 23:17, Philip Kisloff wrote:
> Thanks Paul,
>
> I agree there is the development track, and building up a workflow 
> from
scratch is the way to do that.
> But, and there is a but, our support model doesn't scale up to make 
> this
a corporate standard. Say 200
> applications would be using SAP, I would imagine that would be a big 
> SAP
workflow team needed in place
> for all the custom developments, something perhaps tricky to source.
>
> Now, if we could leverage a packaged solution's customising approach 
> to
implementation, after the initial
> implementation costs might support could be cheaper and more feasible
?
Anything dealing with this
> constraint in the new NetWeaver suite ?
>
> Phil
>





The information contained in this communication and its attachment(s) is
intended only for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed and
may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from
disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify postmaster at owenscorning.com and
delete the communication without retaining any copies. Thank you. 

Translations available: http://www.owenscorning.com/emailfooter.html





------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:44:44 -0400
From: "Munday,Sherie J." <MUNDAYSJ at airproducts.com>
Subject: RE: Workflow not kicking off in TEST system
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
	
<B3D052C7FA25934B94BA33FC2080CA165CB20E at us0355exmp.america.apci.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Henry,
I would suggest to first double check that workflow is properly
configured in the TEST/QA system (SWU3) in the appropriate client.  Then
I would double check on the task itself (WS) that the triggering event
is indeed activated and items correctly bound (PFTC_DIS).  The simplest
things sometimes trip us up.  :o)
Best Wishes,
Sherie
 
Sherie Munday
Workflow Developer/Analyst
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Lowe, Henry
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 11:40 AM
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: Workflow not kicking off in TEST system



 

I have changed an existing workflow in a DEV system, tested it there,
and have transported to TEST/QA for my client to test. With a problem
having been flagged up by them, I have run the required transaction to
trigger the start event in TEST. Strangely, this does not seem to be
creating any work items in SWI1. I initially thought this could be down
to the event linkage being faulty but I have checked in SWETYPV and all
appears to be fine in there. Moreover, I have run an event trace and the
event is appearing in there as having been raised, with everything
appearing to be in order as far as I can tell.

 

Have I missed something here?

 

I am still quite new to workflow so apologies if this is something
pretty obvious.



This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be
copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are
not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and
any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060906/c1d7c1ad/a
ttachment-0001.htm

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 08:08:37 +0200
From: "Kjetil Kilhavn" <KJETILK at statoil.com>
Subject: RE: Workflow not kicking off in TEST system
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
	<273AA3C12CC7C54DA3C0C33F3857FE5C0146D15F at ST-EXCL03.statoil.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

You can also use SWUE to check that your workflow is found by SAP as an
event receiver.
-- 
Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil OFT GBS BAS DEV SAP
 



________________________________

	From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]
On Behalf Of Munday,Sherie J.
	Sent: 6. september 2006 19:45
	To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
	Subject: RE: Workflow not kicking off in TEST system
	
	
	Henry,
	I would suggest to first double check that workflow is properly
configured in the TEST/QA system (SWU3) in the appropriate client.  Then
I would double check on the task itself (WS) that the triggering event
is indeed activated and items correctly bound (PFTC_DIS).  The simplest
things sometimes trip us up.  :o)
	Best Wishes,
	Sherie
	 
	Sherie Munday
	Workflow Developer/Analyst
	Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.

________________________________

	From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]
On Behalf Of Lowe, Henry
	Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 11:40 AM
	To: sap-wug at mit.edu
	Subject: Workflow not kicking off in TEST system
	
	

	 

	I have changed an existing workflow in a DEV system, tested it
there, and have transported to TEST/QA for my client to test. With a
problem having been flagged up by them, I have run the required
transaction to trigger the start event in TEST. Strangely, this does not
seem to be creating any work items in SWI1. I initially thought this
could be down to the event linkage being faulty but I have checked in
SWETYPV and all appears to be fine in there. Moreover, I have run an
event trace and the event is appearing in there as having been raised,
with everything appearing to be in order as far as I can tell.

	 

	Have I missed something here?

	 

	I am still quite new to workflow so apologies if this is
something pretty obvious.



	This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the
intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material,
confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should
not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If
you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this
e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank
you.



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of
the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
delete
this message.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060907/56de1560/a
ttachment.htm

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug


End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 22, Issue 9
**************************************




More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list