Does anyone have anything against seing Guided Proceduresquestions here?

[Gavin Mooney]

Agree with Sherie, glad to soak up the WUG wisdom.
Bring them on.

 - Gavin

2006/11/20, Mark Pyc <mark.pyc at gmail.com>:
> Aye!
>
> I recently attended a SAP Workshop and apparently SAP are pumping huge
> development effort into the area. I also see it as a natural extension but
> from what I've seen although it is being marketed as an end-user/functional
> consultant tool I don't believe it for a second. I'm sure there will be
> plenty of tricks and traps to keep the techo's entertained.
>
> Have fun,
> Mark
>
>
>
> On 11/20/06, Munday,Sherie J. <MUNDAYSJ at airproducts.com> wrote:
> > Kjetil,
> > I agree with Sue.  Although my company is not there yet, undoubtedly
> > when we get there, it will fall to the workflow team to assist with
> > Guided Procedures.  I'll gladly soak up any wisdom from fellow WUG'rs
> > along the way!
> > Cheers,
> > Sherie
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
> > Of Susan R. Keohan
> > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:39 AM
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: Re: Does anyone have anything against seing Guided
> > Proceduresquestions here?
> >
> > Hi Kjetil,
> >
> > I, for one, have no objections at all.  It seems like GP are going to be
> > using the same techniques we all know and love, so this would be a
> > natural extension of our forum.
> >
> > But that's just me....
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Sue
> >
> > Kjetil Kilhavn wrote:
> > > It does not seem far-fetched to assume that developers who have been
> > > working with SAP Business Workflow will be asked to work with Guided
> > > Procedures (or is it only here....) as well. If people (i.e. you) have
> >
> > > nothing against it, I would like to post my Guided Procedures
> > > questions here.
> > >
> > > Thought I'd raise the issue now, before I actually start developing
> > > the GP (and run into problems). Our first "real" project is coming up
> > ...
> > >
> > > I am unfortunately not a very frequent visitor in SDN, so perhaps they
> >
> > > have forums that should rather be used.
> > > --
> > > Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil OFT GBS BAS DEV SAP OFT (Corporate Planning,
> > > Finance & Services) GBS (Global Business Services) BAS (Business
> > > Application Services) DEV (Application Development) SAP (SAP
> > > Development)
> > >
> > >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> > > intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination
> > > of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you
> > > are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return
> > > e-mail and delete this message.
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> > --
> > Susan R. Keohan
> > SAP Workflow Developer
> > MIT Lincoln Laboratory
> > 244 Wood Street
> > LI-200
> > Lexington, MA. 02420
> > Phone: 781-981-3561
> > Fax:   781-981-1607
> > keohan at ll.mit.edu
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>