Workflow implementation in international company

Thu May 18 10:34:41 EDT 2006

Hi Shai Eyal,

You're right about the different date formats. I don't think it's due to 
geographical setting,
its due to the user profile, for WF-BATCH (which might be changeable).
But I couldn't understand the actual problem that you're facing due to this 
and where are u setting
the date and what do actually want to handle?

Regards,
Vijay

>From: "Shai Eyal" <shaie at team.co.il>
>Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>To: <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Subject: Workflow implementation in international company
>Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:52:11 +0200
>
>Hi all,
>I happen to meet a very odd question which I'd like to share. I
>implement workflow in a company which has several sites in the world. As
>you all know, the format of dates as well as numbers with decimals (in
>task text for example) are set according to user WF-BATCH. However, the
>date format in US is different than the one in Europe. Same goes for
>decimals notation in amounts for example.
>
>How do we handle it? Currently, since each country has different company
>code, I set the format accordingly, however I wandered if there's
>something classic.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Shai E.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
>Of sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 11:26 AM
>To: sap-wug at mit.edu
>Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 18, Issue 72
>
>Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
>	sap-wug at mit.edu
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>	http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
>"Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>    1. AW: Rule debugging (Schmidinger, Heinz (Unaxis IT BZ))
>    2. AW: problem with a workflowtask - end node for block '...'
>       not fo und (Schmidinger, Heinz (Unaxis IT BZ))
>    3. RE: Rule debugging (vijay srikanth)
>    4. RE: problem with a workflowtask - end node for block '...'
>       not fo und (hendrik.j.christians at accenture.com)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 10:14:39 +0200
>From: "Schmidinger, Heinz (Unaxis IT BZ)"
>	<heinz.schmidinger at unaxis.com>
>Subject: AW: Rule debugging
>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Message-ID:
>
><7AE63B23F1F03B42A50E2D8723154D30081F0605 at adyo041tr11.e423bz01.unaxis.co
>m>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Good question,
>
>
>
>my personal way is /h (Hoppelmode), than  a brakpoint at f.m.
>'RH_TEST_ROLE_RESOLUTION' and than step in with F5 in call of role-f.m.
>(tRFC)
>
>
>
>hope it helps
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>Von: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] Im Auftrag
>von akshay.bhagwat at wipro.com
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2006 09:58
>An: sap-wug at mit.edu
>Betreff: Rule debugging
>
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>  Wanted to know how to debug the rule execution while simulating the
>rule ?
>
>
>
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Akshay Bhagwat
>
>SAP Practice
>
>Wipro Technologies
>
>': +91 20 2293 3700 x 3608
>Fax: +91 20 2293 3756
>
>
>
>
>The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
>to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s)
>and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If
>you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate,
>distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and
>destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
>
>WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
>should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
>The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
>transmitted by this email.
>
>www.wipro.com
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060518/78b40323/a
>ttachment-0001.htm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 10:41:11 +0200
>From: "Schmidinger, Heinz (Unaxis IT BZ)"
>	<heinz.schmidinger at unaxis.com>
>Subject: AW: problem with a workflowtask - end node for block '...'
>	not fo und
>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Message-ID:
>
><7AE63B23F1F03B42A50E2D8723154D30081F066F at adyo041tr11.e423bz01.unaxis.co
>m>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Try to use function BLOCK CORRECTION.
>
>You find it in Tx PFTC - Desinger Menue: EXTRAS -> SPECIAL-FUNCTIONS.
>
>
>
>Maybe it helps.
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>Von: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] Im Auftrag
>von hendrik.j.christians at accenture.com
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2006 10:08
>An: sap-wug at mit.edu
>Betreff: problem with a workflowtask - end node for block '...' not
>found
>
>
>
>Dear group,
>
>
>
>I have encountered a problem with one of my changes within a workflow.
>For some reason the ending of a step is not recognized and the step
>makes the workflow crash when in runtime.
>
>Editing the step will give strange results by editing the next step
>behind my container task.
>
>
>
>The created container task will not be cut, copied or deleted and adding
>steps behind the created step is not possible anymore. From the point of
>the new created step till the end of the flow I can not ad another step.
>
>
>
>I have added an attachment which contains some screenshots and a more
>extensive explanation.
>
>
>
>Thanks for your input in advance!
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>    Hendrik Jan Christians
>___________________________________
>Accenture Technology Solutions
>
>Camerastraat 17
>1322 BB Almere, The Netherlands
>
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
>received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
>the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060518/77054519/a
>ttachment-0001.htm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:46:35 +0000
>From: "vijay srikanth" <vijay_d15 at hotmail.com>
>Subject: RE: Rule debugging
>To: sap-wug at mit.edu
>Message-ID: <BAY22-F199683473DA8F5817FB25C9DA60 at phx.gbl>
>Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>
>Hi Akshay
>
>If i'm right, this the rule resolution for determining the agents
>correct?
>One indirect way of verifying your rule, would be to goto the workflow
>log and check the container elements/agents if they are properly
>appearing alternatively do a container monitor and check during work
>item execution.
>I'm not sure of how to absolutely do it in debugging.
>
>
>Regards,
>Vijay
>
>
> >From: <akshay.bhagwat at wipro.com>
> >Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >To: <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> >Subject: Rule debugging
> >Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:27:35 +0530
> >
> >
> >Hi All,
> >
> >  Wanted to know how to debug the rule execution while simulating the
> >rule ?
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Akshay Bhagwat
> >
> >SAP Practice
> >
> >Wipro Technologies
> >
> >': +91 20 2293 3700 x 3608
> >Fax: +91 20 2293 3756
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >The information contained in this electronic message and any
> >attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
> >addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged
> >information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not
> >disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
> >immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
> >
> >WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
> >should check this email and any attachments for the presence of
>viruses.
> >The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> >transmitted by this email.
> >
> >www.wipro.com
>
>
> >_______________________________________________
> >SAP-WUG mailing list
> >SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:25:56 +0200
>From: <hendrik.j.christians at accenture.com>
>Subject: RE: problem with a workflowtask - end node for block '...'
>	not fo und
>To: <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Message-ID:
>
><9089809340AB8B4DA2840FB19E2A9826DB72D0 at EMEXM0101.dir.svc.accenture.com>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>I'm sorry that i did not discribe al my actions. I already used the
>block correction, but without any affect. I just tried to make a new
>version and i made a copy, but both without any luck.
>
>Thanks for you're input. I hope for more replies, because my issue still
>exists.
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>    Hendrik Jan Christians
>___________________________________
>Accenture Technology Solutions
>
>Camerastraat 17
>1322 BB Almere, The Netherlands
>
>
>________________________________
>
>From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
>Of Schmidinger, Heinz (Unaxis IT BZ)
>Sent: donderdag 18 mei 2006 10:41
>To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
>Subject: AW: problem with a workflowtask - end node for block '...' not
>fo und
>
>
>
>Try to use function BLOCK CORRECTION.
>
>You find it in Tx PFTC - Desinger Menue: EXTRAS -> SPECIAL-FUNCTIONS.
>
>
>
>Maybe it helps.
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>Von: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] Im Auftrag
>von hendrik.j.christians at accenture.com
>Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2006 10:08
>An: sap-wug at mit.edu
>Betreff: problem with a workflowtask - end node for block '...' not
>found
>
>
>
>Dear group,
>
>
>
>I have encountered a problem with one of my changes within a workflow.
>For some reason the ending of a step is not recognized and the step
>makes the workflow crash when in runtime.
>
>Editing the step will give strange results by editing the next step
>behind my container task.
>
>
>
>The created container task will not be cut, copied or deleted and adding
>steps behind the created step is not possible anymore. From the point of
>the new created step till the end of the flow I can not ad another step.
>
>
>
>I have added an attachment which contains some screenshots and a more
>extensive explanation.
>
>
>
>Thanks for your input in advance!
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>    Hendrik Jan Christians
>___________________________________
>Accenture Technology Solutions
>
>Camerastraat 17
>1322 BB Almere, The Netherlands
>
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
>received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
>the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
>
>
>
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
>received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete
>the original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060518/8b600555/a
>ttachment.htm
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 18, Issue 72
>***************************************
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug