Terminate user decision
Kjetil Kilhavn
KJETILK at statoil.com
Tue Mar 28 02:41:08 EST 2006
Terminating event on the step (task) itself - which I assume is not possible since you say it is a decision step.
Fork with two branches where one waits for event.
--
Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil ØFT KTJ BAS DEV SAP
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Shai Eyal
> Sent: 27. mars 2006 18:45
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Subject: Terminate user decision
>
> Hi all,
>
> My WF has user-decision step, which I'd like to terminate
> whenever other event occurs. I raise the specific event with
> other workflow and wish for the user decision workitem to terminate.
> Any idea how ?
>
> Thanks,
> Shai E.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of sap-wug-request at mit.edu
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 9:03 AM
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 16, Issue 110
>
> Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> sap-wug at mit.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: PO release - terminating event (Mark Pyc)
> 2. Pranpreeya Ariyadej/Thailand/ExxonMobil is out of the office.
> (pranpreeya.ariyadej at exxonmobil.com)
> 3. RE: window length of express message (rina spector)
> 4. Re: Present pop-up to user on save of purchase requisition
> (Anke Libeton)
> 5. RE: Workflow Certification Academy (Kjetil Kilhavn)
> 6. RE: PO release - terminating event (Kjetil Kilhavn)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 22:47:28 +0100
> From: "Mark Pyc" <mark.pyc at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: PO release - terminating event
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <23f0a78a0603261347k33ba1d41ge03d6820e74c979e at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> G'day Shai,
>
> Use a fork step to split to five branches with only 1 needed
> to complete.
> You have four paralel branches for the Release steps and a
> fifth branch containing two sequential wait steps, both for
> your own event (ZWHATEVER).
> In each of the Release branches when the release is effected
> you raise you're own event (ZWHATEVER) and then
> pause/stop/hobble the branch (for example include a Wait for
> Event for something that can never happen e.g.
> Wait for Created on the PO you're already operating with.
> Since it's already created you'll never receive this event
> and the branch will pause).
>
> When the first Release is effected you'll move through the
> first wait for event in the fifth branch.
> When the 2nd Release is effected you'll move through the 2nd
> wait for event in the fifth branch. This will then complete
> the fifth branch and therefore the overall 5 way fork.
>
> After that you can release the PO.
>
> I hope this isn't too confusing. There are variations on a
> theme to be played with, but maybe this gives you some ideas.
>
> Have fun,
> Mark
>
>
>
> On 3/26/06, Shai Eyal <shaie at team.co.il> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > In my PO release procedure I have four release code in
> paralel: a, b,
> > c, d. If two of them release, then the PO is released. Then
> when the
> > Workflow is trigerred, I sent different tasks to each one
> of the four
> > (like standard workflow 20000075 does). When two releases
> I'd like to
> > terminate the tasks of the other two.
> >
> > Any idea how ? I tried to use terminating event but haven't
> had much
> > success.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shai E.
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060326/
05ed764a/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:09:08 +0700
> From: pranpreeya.ariyadej at exxonmobil.com
> Subject: Pranpreeya Ariyadej/Thailand/ExxonMobil is out of the office.
>
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
>
> <OF278FF70D.D9B28D90-ON4725713D.0079AFB0-4725713D.0079AFB0 at exx
onmobil.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> I will be out of the office starting 03/27/2006 and will not
> return until 03/29/2006.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 03:52:39 +0200
> From: "rina spector" <rina.spector at ness.com>
> Subject: RE: window length of express message
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID: <60A88EAE4CA2FF479F1AE3B8A6652C590FF00A at NESSNT11.ness.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255"
>
> Hi Vijay
>
> try to Modify the WL 603 Message Removing most of the text
> "Express ..... with priorrity " from the Beginning of the
> message it gives some air .
> Best Regards ,
> Rina Spector
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Is there any way I can increase the length of the express
> message window. If I write a message in the subject and
> enable express message checkbox in the workflow, some part of
> the subject is lost. How do I enable the entire subject
> properly. Is there a way, or do I have to find a way to
> shorten the subject matter.
>
> Regards,
> Vijay
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/ms-tnef
> Size: 3737 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060327/
b6e4e0a4/attachment-0001.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 14:31:18 +1000
> From: "Anke Libeton" <anke_libeton at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Present pop-up to user on save of purchase requisition
> To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> Message-ID: <BAY114-F671ECE3F2AB7C0A5B64D0E6D20 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>
> Hi Margaret,
>
> You can also put a field exit on the Requester field to make
> sure it contains a valid user id. (Or use user exit at point
> of saving). Field exits are not a SAP-promoted approach, at
> the same time, Field exits are supported in latest releases
> (program RSMODPRF).
>
> Also have a look at user exit M06B0001-ZXM06U12.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Anke Libeton
> Australia
>
>
>
>
>
> On 3/24/06, Hilsbos, Margaret A <Margaret.Hilsbos at dayzim.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello WUGers,
> >
> > We are looking at implementing the purchase requisition
> workflow in a 4.6csystem. We are struggling with the logic
> for selecting the first approver > in the release strategy.
> We have one person who creates requisitions for > several
> departments, and currently they just email the appropriate >
> approver. If we use the standard rule with the IMG
> configuration to assign > the approvers, the closest we can
> get is to assign the security role for the
> > release code -- which returns too many agents. The user
> exit doesn't
> seem
> > to help because there is no value in the purchase
> requisition that can be > used to determine the correct
> recipient, which is based on the requester, > not the
> requisition creator. The "requester" field doesn't help
> because > that is a free text field (although only 12
> characters). If that field > required a SAP user id then we
> could use that to derive the correct > recipient.
> >
> > After studying this I think it would be ideal if we could
> present the > creator of the requisition with a "choose
> agent" dialog when they save the > requisition. However here
> is a stumbling block - > > How to get the dialog presented
> to the user when the purchase requisition > is saved? I
> believe workflow doesn't do this, even if the first step is
> > marked "advance with dialog". This general question keeps
> coming up in other > contexts, too. I searched SDN forum
> and WUG archives with no luck, except > to find "it can't be
> done without a custom transaction" - is that still the > case?
> >
> > Does anyone have any other recommendations for the
> purchase requisition
> > question? Am I (hopefully) missing something obvious?
> >
> > Any suggestions appreciated!
> >
> >
> > Margaret Hilsbos
> > Day & Zimmermann
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SAP-WUG mailing list
> > SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> New year, new job - there's more than 100,00 jobs at SEEK
> http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Eseek
%2Ecom%2Eau&_t=752315885&_r=Jan05_tagline&_m=EXT
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:58:30 +0200
> From: "Kjetil Kilhavn" <KJETILK at statoil.com>
> Subject: RE: Workflow Certification Academy
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <273AA3C12CC7C54DA3C0C33F3857FE5CD1D4AC at ST-EXCL03.statoil.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> TAWF10 was the code a few years ago at least. That gave an
> "Application consultant" certification.
> However, http://www.sap.com/education/ didn't give any
> results when searching for it now, so I think Sherie has the
> best suggestion so far.
> --
> Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil ?FT KTJ BAS DEV SAP
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Munday,Sherie J.
> > Sent: 26. mars 2006 08:41
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: RE: Workflow Certification Academy
> >
> > Bob,
> > When I wanted to take the Workflow Academy some time ago, I
> > had to request the course from SAP, as it was only scheduled
> > in Canada. After receiving a few requests they scheduled the
> > course (mine was in Newtown Square). The exam was held
> > immediately following the academy (on the last day). Of
> > course, they may be updating the course, as it was given in
> > 46B. I would suggest an email to SAP-education
> > http://www50.sap.com/useducation/contact/ .
> > Best of Luck,
> > Sherie
> >
> > Sherie Munday
> > Workflow Developer/ Analyst
> > Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Alon Raskin
> > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 6:41 AM
> > To: 'SAP Workflow Users' Group'
> > Subject: RE: Workflow Certification Academy
> >
> > I found this page on the SAP America site
> >
> > http://www50.sap.com/useducation/curriculum/group.asp?tid=8
> >
> > But I couldn't find anything about WF certification...
> >
> >
> > Alon Raskin
> > e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com
> > p: +1 207 409 4983 (please note new number)
> > f: +61 3 8610 1239
> >
> > The easiest way to integrate SAP with any mobile device
> > http://www.themobileworkplace.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Tan
> > Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 6:12 AM
> > To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> > Subject: Workflow Certification Academy
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know the course for workflow certification academy?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use,
> dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you
> are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return
> e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:02:37 +0200
> From: "Kjetil Kilhavn" <KJETILK at statoil.com>
> Subject: RE: PO release - terminating event
> To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> <273AA3C12CC7C54DA3C0C33F3857FE5CD1D4B8 at ST-EXCL03.statoil.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Why not just create a four-branched fork which requires two
> branches to complete? If it is only four parallell approval
> steps there is no need to make it more complex by introducing
> that fifth branch .... unless it is necessary to catch
> approvals made without using the work items.
> --
> Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil ?FT KTJ BAS DEV SAP
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Mark Pyc
> Sent: 26. mars 2006 23:47
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: Re: PO release - terminating event
>
>
> G'day Shai,
>
> Use a fork step to split to five branches with only 1
> needed to complete. You have four paralel branches for the
> Release steps and a fifth branch containing two sequential
> wait steps, both for your own event (ZWHATEVER). In each of
> the Release branches when the release is effected you raise
> you're own event (ZWHATEVER) and then pause/stop/hobble the
> branch (for example include a Wait for Event for something
> that can never happen e.g. Wait for Created on the PO you're
> already operating with. Since it's already created you'll
> never receive this event and the branch will pause).
>
> When the first Release is effected you'll move through
> the first wait for event in the fifth branch.
> When the 2nd Release is effected you'll move through
> the 2nd wait for event in the fifth branch. This will then
> complete the fifth branch and therefore the overall 5 way fork.
>
> After that you can release the PO.
>
> I hope this isn't too confusing. There are variations
> on a theme to be played with, but maybe this gives you some ideas.
>
> Have fun,
> Mark
>
>
>
> On 3/26/06, Shai Eyal <shaie at team.co.il> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> In my PO release procedure I have four release
> code in paralel: a, b, c,
> d. If two of them release, then the PO is
> released. Then when the
> Workflow is trigerred, I sent different tasks
> to each one of the four
> (like standard workflow 20000075 does). When
> two releases I'd like to
> terminate the tasks of the other two.
>
> Any idea how ? I tried to use terminating event
> but haven't had much
> success.
>
> Thanks,
> Shai E.
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use,
> dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you
> are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return
> e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060327/
1905930e/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
> End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 16, Issue 110
> ****************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list