Restricting agent types when forwarding a wi from inbox (SBWP) -4.6C and ECC 5.0

[Dart, Jocelyn]

Apologies, 
Forgot to send a heartfelt thank you  (THANKS!!!) to everyone who
contributed ... but yes the request has gone in for
BADIs in forwarding and substitution.  
Hopeful it will get approval given the large demand from all of you but
when and in which release(s) it will be done is anyone's guess at this
stage. 

Viveka, just be careful you don't impact HR selections as well - T779O
is a shared table. 
Might be better at this stage to add a mod to the relevant workflow
forwarding function to check the 
forwardee type and kill the forwarding for "creative" users - along with
a suitably crushing message of course ;-)

Regards,
Jocelyn Dart
Senior Consultant
SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
Level 1/168 Walker St.
North Sydney 
NSW, 2060
Australia
T   +61 412 390 267
M   + 61 412 390 267
E   jocelyn.dart at sap.com
http://www.sap.com

The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for
the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution,
copying, review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this
electronic transmission or the information contained in it is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
please immediately contact the sender to arrange for the return of the
original documents. 
Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure and
accordingly, the sender does not accept liability for any such data
corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the
consequences thereof.
Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the
individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the
sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of
its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors,
officers and employees make no representation nor accept any liability
for the accuracy or completeness of the views or information contained
herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/
business proposal herein is indicative only, is subject to change and
shall not be construed as an offer or as constituting a binding
agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries to enter into
any relationship, unless otherwise expressly stated. 


-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Mark Pyc
Sent: Thursday, 09 March 2006 8:03 PM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Re: Restricting agent types when forwarding a wi from inbox
(SBWP) -4.6C and ECC 5.0

G'day Viveka,

At this stage I don't think you have much control over forwarding
other than limiting forwarding to Possible Agents (General Forwarding
Not Allowed).

There have been numerous requests for more control, often by me. My
typical requirement is to limit forwarding agents to be within the
same Company Code for example.

Jocelyn Dart did send out a query a while ago to see if anyone had
developed a custom solution in the absence of a BAdI or equivalent.
There wasn't any response from memory, but hopefully SAP is looking to
deliver something... Jocelyn?

All I can suggest is that everyone raises it as a development request
and hopefully something gets done.

Have fun,
Mark


On 09/03/06, viveka.schwartz at implema.se <viveka.schwartz at implema.se>
wrote:
>
> Hello workflowers,
>
> we would like to restrict the agent types in the extended selection
screen
> when forwarding a wi from the SBWP inbox.
>
> The agent types are defined in T779O and can be restricted there.
>
> However, my question is if anybody knows if there is an authorization
object
> which can be used for allowing forward only to agents of type US
(userIDs),
> type S (positions) and type O (org.units) ?
> I.e we would like to exclude agent of type EmployeeID (type P) and
Jobs
> (type C) from the selection list.
>
> Or does anybody have any other idea on how to this (without
modification to
> the standard pgm) ?
>
> I have two clients interested in this; one on 4.6C and one on ECC 5.0
>
> Kind regards
> Viveka
> ________________________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug