Corrupt Sub WF definition.
Mike.Nickson@boots.com
Mike.Nickson at boots.com
Thu Mar 9 08:12:00 EST 2006
Manish
I had the same (or similar) problem here.
I could access the workflow OK in the development client, but if I
referred to the workflow in any other client (PFTC, SWI1 etc) then I would
get a short dumps.
Luckily this did not get as far as our production system.
Our problem was related to a condition node in the workflow that was
corrupted in some way, but SAP fixed it for me.
We were getting CALL_FUNCTION_REMOTE_ERROR dumps at the rate of 1 per second as the
program was looping . . . Is this what you are getting ?
Mike
"Khanna, Manish" <manish.khanna at amd.com>
Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
08/03/2006 01:34
Please respond to "SAP Workflow Users' Group"
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
cc:
Subject: Corrupt Sub WF definition.
Hi,
I've found a peculiar problem.
We have a logistic invoice approval workflow having a main process and an
approval 'sub workflow'. For some issue I need to look at the 'sub
workflow' definition but SWDD and PFTC give short dump when trying to
display the workflow definition.
I tried in our production system also, but the issue remains.
Interestingly the workflow is running fine, which means the runtime
version is intact.
How can I recover the WF definition???
Regards,
Manish_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060309/cf6a0d50/attachment.htm
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list