RSWUWFML2 avoiding log at spool

Shai Eyal shaie at team.co.il
Thu Jan 19 07:49:57 EST 2006


Nope, I'm with "errors only".
Thanks anyway.

________________________________

מאת: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu בשם sap-wug-request at mit.edu
נשלח: ה 19/01/2006 13:54
אל: sap-wug at mit.edu
נושא: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 14, Issue 55



Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
        sap-wug at mit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        sap-wug-request at mit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
        sap-wug-owner at mit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. RE: BUS2081, FIPP & the Good 'ol Fiscal Year End issue...
      (Andy.M.Catherall at csplc.com)
   2. RE: RSWUWFML2 avoiding log at spool (Kjetil Kilhavn)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:24:49 +0000
From: Andy.M.Catherall at csplc.com
Subject: RE: BUS2081, FIPP & the Good 'ol Fiscal Year End issue...
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <OF06C4ECE6.8E9A062B-ON802570FB.0032BC19 at emeaa.csplc.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Serge

Thanks for the work-around help. I am coming round to thinking that I will
need to implement some form of tidyup, though thankfully that will
predominantly be limited to the clearing out orphaned workflows for
invoices that have now been posted. (...hmmm, though I will probably still
need to correct the containers etc for audit trail purposes...)

Is everyone having to implement a work-around, though? As mentioned, all
the OSS details [that I've come across so far] clearly suggest that the
workflows should automatically respond to the invoice number change,
following implementation of the fixes they describe. I also note that the
IXOS images appear to have been successfully re-assigned to the new
invoice, so some black-magic has been going on...

Does anyone understand more fully how the key is supposed to automatically
correct itself?

Confused of Birmingham...



|---------+----------------------------->
|         |           "Breslavets       |
|         |           Sergey"           |
|         |           <sergey.breslavets|
|         |           @volvo.com>       |
|         |           Sent by:          |
|         |           sap-wug-bounces at mi|
|         |           t.edu             |
|         |                             |
|         |                             |
|         |           18/01/2006 18:50  |
|         |           Please respond to |
|         |           "SAP Workflow     |
|         |           Users' Group"     |
|         |                             |
|---------+----------------------------->
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                                              |
  |       To:       "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>                                                                |
  |       cc:                                                                                                                    |
  |       Subject:  RE: BUS2081, FIPP & the Good 'ol Fiscal Year End issue...                                                    |
  >------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Hi Andy,

welcome to the 'Year-end convertion issue' club! :)

the converted invoice will have the old invoice Id as part of the reference
key field (XBLNR). create a small function module to listen to the
invoice.created event and determine if the invoice is created as a result
of the year-end conversion (check XBLNR). If yes, you can do the following:
1. find appropriate workflow instance relevant for the old number and (if
it's still active) replace invoice object key in the runtime container with
the new one (pointing to the new document). Make sure you replace it in all
appropriate containers, workflow and task!
2. get image id from the workflow and link it to the new document
3. replace the workitem for the last task so that it picks up new container
values

that should do it.

g'luck.
Serge

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at MIT.EDU [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at MIT.EDU]On Behalf
Of Andy.M.Catherall at csplc.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 12:28 PM
To: sap-wug at MIT.EDU
Subject: BUS2081, FIPP & the Good 'ol Fiscal Year End issue...


Hi all

A New Year, an old problem... though I'm frustrated that it appears to be
continuing.

Summary of the problem:
Those invoice documents created last year, but posted this year, have a new
key created based on the new year. The active workflow instances,
listening out for events based on the original key, ignore the posting of
the new document.

Of course, there have been innumerable OSS notes & discussions about this
problem going back as far as the year 2000. After reading these, and a
number of WUG Archive entries, I think I have an understanding of what I
should be expecting to happen. It's just that it is not, so I'd like to
determine where my expectation has gone astray. I'll describe what I think
I understand to be true. Could someone clarify if I've missed something.

1) An invoice is created with a key which includes the year in which it was
raised
2) If that invoice is posted in the new year, the original one is deleted
and a new one is created.
3) Once upon a time, events would be raised to represent the deletion and
creation events, and the workflows would react. However, subsequent fixes
have modified the response so that active workflows for the original
invoice should have their keys updated to use that of the new object. I
should expect to see no events to trigger this magical process.
4) Any IXOS image attachments are 'reassigned' in the appropriate link
table (eg TOA01) to the new Invoice document.
5) These 're-keying' exercises occur as part of the save/create process for
the invoice and is not based upon some other external process being
manually called. No BO events would be seen as a result.

I seem to be missing step 3. As expected, I have no events, but the
underlying workflows have not had their keys changed and they have not
reacted in any way.


I have obviously looked into documentation about this. There are a number
OSS notes out there, all of which appear to 'resolve' this issue. One is
from around 2000 (OSS 87700); One is from July 2003 (OSS 549381); One is
from Feb 2004 (598018); we appear to be up to date with all these. There is
also a rather brief note from September 2004 which sounds exactly like my
problem ("Symptom: The change to the fiscal year is ignored for current
workflow instances), but is only valid from basis release 610 up.


We are on 46c, basis support pack 47.

Any ideas?

Thanks
Andy



***********************************************************************************


This e-mail is confidential and may contain privileged information.  If you
are not the addressee or if you have received the e-mail in error,  it may
be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use
the information which it contains.

Under these circumstances, please notify us immediately by returning this
mail to 'mailerror at csplc.com' and deleting this e-mail from your system.

Any views expressed by an individual within this e-mail do not necessarily
reflect the views of Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its subsidiaries.  Whilst we
have taken reasonable steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are
free from viruses,  recipients are advised to subject this mail to their
own virus checking, in keeping with good computing practice.

Visit our website at www.cadburyschweppes.com

***********************************************************************************


_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug





------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:53:57 +0100
From: "Kjetil Kilhavn" <KJETILK at statoil.com>
Subject: RE: RSWUWFML2 avoiding log at spool
To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
Message-ID:
        <273AA3C12CC7C54DA3C0C33F3857FE5C9EAA20 at ST-EXCL03.statoil.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

You must have set the logging option to "All" instead of "Errors only" in your variant.
--
Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil ?FT KTJ ITS BKS SAP Basis



________________________________

        From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Shai Eyal
        Sent: 19. januar 2006 10:22
        To: sap-wug at mit.edu
        Subject: RSWUWFML2 avoiding log at spool
       
       
        Hi all,
        I'm using report RSWUWFML2 and all works well - no errors (so far). However, even without errors, the log is written to the spool. Since we run it every 5 minutes, the spool is getting fulled with junk.
        Is there any way to avoid writing to the spool ? maybe with the user settings ?
        
        Thanks in advance,
        
        Shai E.

________________________________

        ???: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu ??? sap-wug-request at mit.edu
        ????: ? 16/01/2006 19:01
        ??: sap-wug at mit.edu
        ????: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 14, Issue 44
       
       

        Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
                sap-wug at mit.edu
       
        To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
                http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
        or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
                sap-wug-request at mit.edu
       
        You can reach the person managing the list at
                sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
       
        When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
        than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
       
       
        Today's Topics:
       
           1. Triggering Changed Event on BUS2001 not happening (Bibby, David)
           2. RE: Help Ataching an just scanned bill image by documents in
              R/3 (Tiwari, Rammanohar)
           3. RE: Sending Internet mail from workflow in 4.6c - I am so
              confused. (Srinivasan Ramanan)
       
       
        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
       
        Message: 1
        Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:23:05 -0000
        From: "Bibby, David" <david.bibby at linklaters.com>
        Subject: Triggering Changed Event on BUS2001 not happening
        To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
        Message-ID:
                <507C3065664B7B499B9700C0AF1DCE3205F7A294 at ACOPEX06.practice.linklaters.net>
              
        Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
       
        Hi All,
        I am having problems triggering a custom event called 'Changed' on
        BUS2001.
        I have done the delegation and created the event on ZBUS2001.
       
        In SWEC I have made the config. entry with the settings:
        Change Doc Object: PROJ
        Business Object: BUS2001
        Event: Changed
        On Change option selected.
       
        This event is released on ZBUS2001.
        However when I make a change to a project using txn CJ20N, no Changed
        event triggers.
       
        Can anyone offer any suggestions as to why the event is not triggering?
       
        Many thanks
        David
       
       
        _______________________________________________
        This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy it or disclose its contents to anyone. All messages sent to and from Linklaters may be monitored to ensure compliance with internal policies and to protect our business. Emails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by email is taken to accept these risks.
       
        The contents of any email addressed to our clients are subject to our usual terms of business; anything which does not relate to the official business of the firm is neither given nor endorsed by it.
       
        The registered address of the UK partnership of Linklaters is One Silk Street, London, EC2Y 8HQ. Please refer to http://www.linklaters.com/regulation for important information on the regulatory position of the firm.
       
        -------------- next part --------------
        An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
        URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060116/64c8b993/attachment-0001.htm
       
        ------------------------------
       
        Message: 2
        Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:08:01 +0530
        From: "Tiwari, Rammanohar" <rammanohar.tiwari at logicacmg.com>
        Subject: RE: Help Ataching an just scanned bill image by documents in
                R/3
        To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>,      "Breslavets Sergey"
                <sergey.breslavets at volvo.com>
        Message-ID:
                <1752C804BB00CF43AFBEA103357AD7AE05B2E0A4 at in-ex001.groupinfra.com>
        Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"
       
        May be my scenario is similar...
       
        After reading the document imagine my ZFRIENDS as your ZDOCUMENT and so on...
       
        http://www.geocities.com/rmtiwari/Resources/Training/BusinessWorkflow/SAPApplicationDevelopment.pdf
       
        or
        http://www.geocities.com/rmtiwari/Resources/Training/BusinessWorkflow/SAPApplicationDevelopment.htm
       
        Cheers,
        Ram
       
        -----Original Message-----
        From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]On Behalf
        Of Glauco Kubrusly
        Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 2:59 AM
        To: Breslavets Sergey; Process Control Step
        Subject: RE: Help Ataching an just scanned bill image by documents in
        R/3
       
       
        Hi Sergey, ok. I will try to explain my problem and I
        will try to be more especific.
       
        thanks for your atention. My English is not good, but
        I will try.
       
        I've already read some documents about my issue, but I
        didn't understand some specific parts, like:
        - must programme with methods ?
        - How do I get the image scaned by IXOS (I'm using
        IXOS to scan)?
        - Where can I store it ?
        - I know that the image can be linked with R/3
        documents by some table... but, im my case, my
        "document" is created... is a Zdocument that we called
        here as "Protocolo", that hold some bill's data, as
        number, serie, date etc. And we want to get the bill
        image and link with our protocol Zdocument that have
        its own table.
       
        the workflow will follow by a Ztransaction, that is
        the same that the user received the bill and the
        material and will starts the workflow... the 2nd user
        of the flow will receive a task and will open this
        Ztransaction again and would see this scaned image and
        click in a button to open MIGO to him.
       
        this workflow will follow this flow until payment.
       
        1- how can I get the image scaned by ixos and store it
        on R/3 ?
        2- how can I put a funtionality to show this image in
        this Ztransaction ?
       
        Please, I'm stoped here.... without having sucess ...
       
        thanks,
       
        Glauco
       
       
       
       
        --- Breslavets Sergey <sergey.breslavets at volvo.com>
        escreveu:
       
        > Hi Glauco,
        >
        > i can help you.
        >
        > This kind of application is commonly known as
        > Imaging (AP) workflow or Incoming Invoice Ledger.
        > I'm specializing in this and have implemented ton of
        > different scenarios - i actually have developed my
        > own product in the process. It's not terribly
        > difficult once you know what to do, but not a
        > trivial as well. Couple of other companies in US do
        > that, one of them is IXOS -  was my client - i have
        > developed the product(commercial) version of the
        > Imaging workflow for them.
        >
        > Basically there are several components to the
        > solution:
        > 1. Invoice reader (can be OCR module, manual -
        > Zransaction, RFC feed, etc)
        > 2. Incominig Invoice Ledger - the main repository
        > for the scanned invoices and attributes
        > 3. Approval/Posting workflow that routes the image
        > for approval, creates MM documents, post invoices,
        > etc.
        > 4. Invoice Ledger Viewer - end-user browser to
        > monitor the scanned invoices and control the process
        > process
        >
        > There are many variations to this depending on the
        > way customer processes invoices. e.g. Do they
        > process MM invoices only, or Services too. do they
        > process multy or single line invoices, how do you
        > want to keep the images, retention periods, etc...
        >
        > It's hard to try to explain step-by-step what do you
        > have to do in order to develop the solution from
        > scratch.
        >
        > 1. You can start from determining what information
        > you will need in order to process/post the invoice
        > (e.g. invoice date, amount, currency, vendor, etc.)
        > and what information will be required for reporting
        > purposes for your client (they will probably want to
        > see some summary report of processed invoices). when
        > you know that, you can then figure out what
        > information you shall obtain from the indexer (the
        > person who will run ztransaction), and what can be
        > gathered later in the process. Look at the sample of
        > invoice and see what can be extracted from there.
        >
        > 2. you will need to create your own business object.
        > I can show you structure and methods.
        >
        > 3. these fields are the reference key to the
        > logistic document. You don't have to bother about
        > them now.
        >
        >
        > Please ask if you have any specific questions and
        > i'll try to answer them. 
        >
        >
        > Best Regards,
        > Serge
        > 314-761-5217
        > sergey.breslavets at sapbpm.com
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >  -----Original Message-----
        > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
        > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]On Behalf Of Glauco
        > Kubrusly
        > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:05 AM
        > To: sap-wug at mit.edu
        > Subject: Help Ataching an just scanned bill image by
        > documents in R/3
        >
        >
        > Hi friends,
        >
        > I'm sorry because my English isn't good but I'll try
        > to explain my situation here.
        >
        > I need to create a link between my own "SAP object"
        > (for example billing data) and archived image stored
        > in IXOS.
        >
        > My process here is to develope a control to
        > materials received using workflow. The vendow will
        > delivery to us, the user will scan the bill and put
        > some data in some fields in a screen in a
        > Ztransaction. All I want is atach this new bill
        > (just scanned by him).
        >
        > The customer here thinks that the user can't have
        > difficult things to do, so we have to develop a
        > solution that give him a practical process to do it.
        >
        > We have the follow solution:
        > We want to develop an aplication that starting from
        > our application, in save moment, calls the ixos scan
        > client and scan one bill by process only ('cause we
        > think the user can complicate thi! s process if he
        > scan a lot of documents and it can start wrong bills
        > by processes). And we want to create another
        > solution instead the standard OAWD transaction (that
        > is the IXOS standard solution).
        >
        > then... we want (if possible):
        > 1-the user receive the bill,
        > 2-the user fill the screen, field-by-field and save
        > (it is one bill by each process);
        > 3-(in the save moment) our transaction can start the
        > ixos scan client and give to the user the
        > opportunity to scan the bill;
        > 4-after that, we will start the workflow to aprove
        > this bill, MIGO, MIRO and finally do the payment.
        >
        > Is it hard to do ?
        >
        > a) I've already have an object in SWO1 with the
        > methods: GetApplLinks and GOSAddObjects.
        >
        > b) I've read documents about Object oriented
        > programming, utilizing methods but I didn't
        > anderstand what I must do to can atach a just
        > scanned bill on a Ztransaction.
        >
        > c) I've read about 3 fields AWSYS! , AWKEY and
        > AWTYP, but I couldn't make it work.
        >
        > What must I do ?
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > Glauco S. Kubrusly
        >
        >
        >   _____
        >
        > Yahoo! doce lar. Fa?a
        >
        <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/br/tagline/homepage_set/*http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html>
        > do Yahoo! sua homepage.
        >
       
       
       
              
       
       
       
              
                      
        _______________________________________________________
        Yahoo! doce lar. Fa?a do Yahoo! sua homepage.
        http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html
       
        _______________________________________________
        SAP-WUG mailing list
        SAP-WUG at mit.edu
        http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
       
       
        This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
       
       
       
        ------------------------------
       
        Message: 3
        Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:42:05 -0500
        From: "Srinivasan Ramanan" <r_m_n_n at hotmail.com>
        Subject: RE: Sending Internet mail from workflow in 4.6c - I am so
                confused.
        To: sap-wug at mit.edu
        Message-ID: <BAY106-F17002FD6CA171C8D7607048F1B0 at phx.gbl>
        Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
       
        Hi Jocelyn,
        I was impressed by this thread. I had a questions previously posted, but I
        could not figure it out still ? I am batteling with SAP in this regard and
        SAP is yet to resolve my issue.
        But I guess you could throw some light on this issue.
       
        System is 4.6C with support pack 48
        Issue is :
       
        RSWUWFML2 is sending the e-mails to our  lotus notes e-mail addresses. I am
        sending the executable work item also as an attachment.
        What happens is , user is not gettign the SAP shortcut for the executable
        workiotem in their lotus notes e-mail.
        Instead the complete text is sent as inline text. When I save the text in
        notepad with .SAP file extension , it is save as shotcut file.
       
        I need your inputs from your experience. Thanks and regards
        Srinivasan
       
       
        >From: "Hilsbos, Margaret A" <Margaret.Hilsbos at dayzim.com>
        >Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
        >To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
        >Subject: RE: Sending Internet mail from workflow in 4.6c - I am so
        >confused.
        >Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:12:51 -0500
        >
        >A-ha. Yes Jocelyn you are right! (of course!)
        >
        >Thanks for the info.
        >
        >~Margaret
        >
        >-----Original Message-----
        >From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]On Behalf
        >Of Dart, Jocelyn
        >Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 12:23 AM
        >To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
        >Subject: RE: Sending Internet mail from workflow in 4.6c - I am so
        >confused.
        >
        >
        >Hi Margaret,
        >
        >Possibly you hadn't assigned a specific email address to the sender user
        >id WF-BATCH???
        >In which case the domain would be needed to create a sender email
        >address.
        >
        >Akshay,
        >You can send to any internet email address - its up to the email
        >dispatcher you have linked
        >to your SAP system to forward it on.   Workflow creates the email and
        >sends it to the email dispatcher
        >(based on the SCOT configurations) for delivery. Its up to the email
        >dispatcher to deliver it to the correct
        >address.
        >
        >
        >Regards,
        >Jocelyn Dart
        >Senior Consultant
        >SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
        >Level 1/168 Walker St.
        >North Sydney
        >NSW, 2060
        >Australia
        >T   +61 412 390 267
        >M   + 61 412 390 267
        >E   jocelyn.dart at sap.com
        >http://www.sap.com
        >
        >
        >
        >-----Original Message-----
        >From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
        >Of akshay.bhagwat at wipro.com
        >Sent: Friday, 13 January 2006 3:18 PM
        >To: sap-wug at mit.edu
        >Subject: RE: Sending Internet mail from workflow in 4.6c - I am so
        >confused.
        >
        >
        >Hi,
        >
        >A very basic question in this regard.
        >Can this mail from workflow be sent to any internet mail address or to
        >certain addresses only e.g. outlook, lotus notes etc.
        >
        >Thanks and Regards,
        >Akshay
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >_______________________________________________
        >SAP-WUG mailing list
        >SAP-WUG at mit.edu
        >http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
       
        _________________________________________________________________
        Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
        http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
       
       
       
        ------------------------------
       
        _______________________________________________
        SAP-WUG mailing list
        SAP-WUG at mit.edu
        http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
       
       
        End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 14, Issue 44
        ***************************************
       



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060119/b087eccd/attachment.htm

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug


End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 14, Issue 55
***************************************


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 53668 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060119/fa2e66fa/attachment.bin


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list