Role resolution using responsibilities

[Alon Raskin]

It's a funny one Mike because I always considered it bad practice to assign User IDs directly to a responsibility. I would be interested to hear from anyone else as to why you would want to take this approach.
 
Regards,
 
Alon Raskin
e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com <mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com> 
p: +1 207 409 4983 (please note new number)
f:  +61 3 8610 1239 
w: http://www.3i-consulting.com

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu on behalf of Mike Pokraka
Sent: Tue 1/10/2006 06:45
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: Re: Role resolution using responsibilities



Hi Akshay,

Indicator: Personal Rules

    Rules with responsibilities can be personal or function-based. In the
    case of personal rules, responsibilities are only relevant if users or
    persons are assigned directly. In the case of function-based rules,
    responsibilities are inherited along the organizational structure.

In other words, personal means you need to assign the agents directly, not
using org units or whatever. I have no idea why it's there, never used it.
Possibly to force people to assign individual users instead of getting
lazy and assigning a whole org unit.

Cheers
Mike

akshay.bhagwat at wipro.com wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>  I have doubt related to one of the check box while creating the role
> using responsibilities.
> Pls. let me know the significance of check box for - " Personal role"
> i.e when to use it and when not relevant.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Akshay
>
>
>
>
> The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
> to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and
> may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you
> are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or
> copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all
> copies of this message and any attachments.
>
> WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
> should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
> The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this email.
>
> www.wipro.com_______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 6255 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060110/6d07f6d1/attachment.bin