RSWUWFML2 Report

[Hill, Anna]

Hi Seth

This may not be relevant to you but it's worth sharing - I've had a
problem with this report when running on ECC 5.0. The report was set to
pick up new work items only but was actually ignoring this and
delivering duplicate reminders to users on each new run of the report.
There's an OSS message out on this to fix (739988 I think) - it may be
worth checking whether your users are receiving duplicate notifications
in this case. Could make snes if you've only been live for 1 month.

Cheers
Anna

-----Original Message-----
From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Mike Pokraka
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:41 AM
To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
Subject: RE: RSWUWFML2 Report

Hi Seth,

This might still be correct. I may be wrong and don't really have the
time
to check, but your variant looks right so a sensible conclusion may be
that one initial run with 'new work items only' is needed to set your
last
run date - thus your interval only becomes effective on the second run.

Cheers,
Mike


> I updated the variant to include "New Work Items Only" and the report
> still took 3.5 hours to run this morning.  Below is the screen variant
> used, any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Seth
>
> Job suffix                      2
>
> Tasks (blank = all)             TS90000070
>
>                                 TS90000110
>
>                                 TS90000130
>
>                                 TS90000058
>
>                                 TS90000066
>
>                                 TS90000005
>
>                                 TS90000150
>
>                                 TS90000129
>
>                                 TS90000142
>
> New Work Items Only             X
>
> With Passive Substitution
>
> One Message Per Work Item
>
> Collective Message              X
>
> Workflow Entry
>
> Work Item Display
>
> Work Item Execution
>
> Message Class for Subject       SWU_NOTIF
>
> Message Number for Subject      001
>
> Before Work Item Description    SWU_NOTIF_INBOX
>
> After Work Item Description
>
> SAPLOGON_ID
>
> FB for Preparation Phase
>
> FB for Address Determination
>
>>From Work Item Creation Date    00/00/0000
>
>>From Work Item Creation Time      :  :
>
> Users (blank = all)
>
> Errors Only                     X
>
> All
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
Behalf
> Of Stevens, Seth
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 9:45 AM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: RE: RSWUWFML2 Report
>
> As you guessed "only new workitems" isn't set...guess I missed it when
> setting up the variant.
>
> I'll change it today suspect we'll see MUCH better performance
> tomorrow's run.  Thanks for the tips.
>
> --Seth
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On
Behalf
> Of Mike Pokraka
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 9:37 AM
> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
> Subject: Re: RSWUWFML2 Report
>
> What the...? Three hours? Sone hints:
>
> Make sure you set "only new workitems" (methinks this is where your
> setup is choking)
>
> You can create separate instances of the job for different tasks /
> frequencies / whatevers. Not uncommon to run it e.g. an hourly one for
> 'urgent notification' type tasks and a twice daily job for others etc.
>
> It's pretty well documented, click the info button on the front
screen.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
>
>> Hi all...does any one have any performance suggestions for the
>> RSWUSFML2 report for workitem notification?  It is currently taking
>> over 3 hours to run and is increasing at a rate of about 10 minutes
>> per day.  I'm sure that archiving the workitems and logs would help
>> but I didn't want to do that yet as the system has been in production
>> for less than 1 month.  Is the architecture of the report such that
>> the response time is affected by all workitems (even completed) or is
>> it only affected by the number of in process workitems?
>>
>> Any tips?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Seth
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>> Anadarko Confidentiality Notice:
>> This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other
>> writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is
>> addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential
>
>> or otherwise protected from disclosure.  If you have received this
>> communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return
>> e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of
>> this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named
>> recipient is strictly prohibited.
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
> _______________________________________________
> SAP-WUG mailing list
> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>


_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug