Multiple versions created when Workflow template is transported

Edwin Mukusha emukusha at nebraska.edu
Tue Apr 4 10:08:23 EDT 2006


Dear Sue,

We too are on the same version as you.  I have experienced the problem in 
our Quality as you describe it.  I have had multiple non-active transport 
versions created when there was a problem at activation time as the final 
step of the transport process.  If for example I transported my workflow 
definition ahead of other objects the workflow would fail to generate at 
some moment during process.  However by the time I came in to do a 'syntax 
check' all the programming objects were there and  it seemed odd why the 
new version was not being used.  In such a case I fixed this problem in 
Quality by sending through another transport.  I wish though I could 
simple go to the workflow builder and access the menu option 
Workflow->Activation->Generate and Activate Runtime version. 

Another situation was at upgrade time (and one other time unrelated to 
one), I believe we had a couple of instances where there was a version gap 
in the Quality system for whatever reason.  So our latest changes were not 
being picked up in since UNQ was expecting version 007 and we were clear 
back to version 001.  To fix this we just transported the same workflow 6 
times to bring us back to right level.  I also remember multiple version 
gaps in the rare case I used an SAP delivered workflow template.

Some tips when transporting:
- after transporting don't always expect that all the tables will be 
updated instantly there is some buffering that can cause delays, basis can 
help in extreme cases of delayed updates
- be careful on the order or objects
- find a period when the system is quiet (this can be a challenge!)
- also generate any objects that you have changed in tx swo1
- run transaction tx. swu7 first before trying to use the workflow
- if you find errors in tx. swu7 , simply double click the workflow no. to 
drill down into the workflow builder. this will force the system to read 
the new workflow definition
- run the all important 'swu_obuf' transaction
- exit and re-run swu7 and your errors should disappear
- to find which version is being used by a workflow in any system just 
view the latest wf log: from the workitem display goto Extras->Technical 
Data there you will find the Definition Version.
- also an important view for the actual version information is on the 
first screen before the workflow builder if you use tx pftc:  goto 
Utilities->Technical Information scroll down in the window and you will 
find more detailed version information compared to the dropdown on the 
workflow builder screen.  This information can differ???

This might all seem kind of 'hokey' but I am sure you can understand that 
depending on the your system configuration, buffering cycles and system 
load; a lot has to happen in harmony if your workflow is to arrive in one 
piece.

I hope this helps.


all the best

Edwin.
 




"Sue Doughty" <Sue.Doughty at odfl.com>
Sent by: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
03/31/2006 12:01 PM
Please respond to "SAP Workflow Users' Group"
 
        To:     "SAP WF User Group \(E-mail\)" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Multiple versions created when Workflow template 
is transported


We are on SAP Version 4.7, SAP Basis 6.20. 
We have an issue where transporting a modified workflow template to the 
Quality system sometimes causes multiple versions to be created in Runtime 
available, Saved status.  The changes made that are being transported are 
in the Runtime available, Saved versions so we are not able to execute the 
workflow with the new changes.  Every time you go into the Workflow 
builder to look at the template in the Quality system, the number of 
versions increases.  I transported one today that was Version 0001 and is 
now up to Version 59 in the Quality system.
This does not happen all the time -- it is sporadic -- and it does not 
happen when we promote the transport to the Production system.
I have checked for any OSS notes on this issue, but have found none. 
Has anyone else ever had this problem? 
Regards, 
Sue T. Doughty
Workflow Specialist
Old Dominion Freight Lines, Inc.
Office:(336)822-5189 Fax:(336)822-5149
sue.doughty at odfl.com 
_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20060404/3536779d/attachment.htm


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list