SRM 4.0 - Shopping Carts - new info
Susan R. Keohan
keohan at ll.mit.edu
Thu Oct 20 09:36:10 EDT 2005
Of course, it would help if I did my *due diligence* before reporting an issue to the list...
When I shop, it creates a short dump and an error in SM58. The short dump error is
'DYNPRO_SEND_IN_BACKGROUND' in SAPMSSYD.
The SM58 error is:
'Screen output without connection to user.' for function module BBP_PDH_WFL_DB_UPDATE_BACK.
If I try to do a trace (according to the comments in the above function) using the following steps:
* create trace of test data by :
* 1) calling transaction bbptrace
* 2) enter user and name
* 3) do your tests
* 4) deactivate the trace
* 5) look in the test data of this function
There is no test data for the function BBP_PDH_WFL_DB_UPDATE_BACK, and I get a new short dump,
'OBJECTS_MOVE_NOT_SUPPORTED', and a new SM58 entry, 'Conversion of type h to type C not supported.'.
Just in case, I deactivated my BADI, and when I did that, and shopped, I returned to the original
short dump 'DYNPROC_SEND_IN_BACKGROUND', 'Screen output without connection to user'.
I must be ahead of schedule... Usually I get this baffled, it's on a Friday. Anyhow, any help on
any of these errors is appreciated,
Happy WF-ing,
Sue
Susan R. Keohan wrote:
> Hi Jocelyn,
>
> Thanks for the info... I will make the suggested change today. For the
> time being, it's a good thing that my carts don't automatically go into
> WS1000060, because that gives me the opportunity to create a bunch of
> carts for testing with the N-Step BADI workflow without 'disrupting' the
> other folks' shopping experience.
> But I noticed other users also have this message when I run
> BBP_CHECK_USERS. They can shop and their carts get into the standard WF.
> Our org structure is a copy of our EBP 3.5 Production system. There is
> linkage between the Position, Central Person, and User (although there
> are no 'chiefs', which one of our SRM consultants says is the issue).
>
> So I guess I need to look a little closer at the differences between my
> userid and the others.
> Any other tups are, as always, greatly appreciated!
>
> Happy WF-ing,
> Sue
>
>
> Dart, Jocelyn wrote:
>
>> Hi Sue, Yes it's you - well, your userid.
>> Set the flag in T77S0 as instructed. There's a SAP note discussing
>> this. It's not misleading - it just depends on how your user id,
>> position and central person relationships were created.
>> In SRM workflow needs either both a S-CP-US relationship and the S-US
>> relationship or the flag set as suggested.
>> Turning on the flag will make your user id work but won't upset anything
>> else. It'll just "fill in the blanks" for your userid.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jocelyn Dart
>> Senior Consultant
>> SAP Australia Pty Ltd.
>> Level 1/168 Walker St.
>> North Sydney NSW, 2060
>> Australia
>> T +61 412 390 267
>> M + 61 412 390 267
>> E jocelyn.dart at sap.com
>> http://www.sap.com
>>
>> The information contained in or attached to this electronic transmission
>> is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for
>> the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution,
>> copying, review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this
>> electronic transmission or the information contained in it is strictly
>> prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error,
>> please immediately contact the sender to arrange for the return of the
>> original documents. Electronic transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
>> secure and
>> accordingly, the sender does not accept liability for any such data
>> corruption, interception, unauthorized amendment, viruses, delays or the
>> consequences thereof.
>> Any views expressed in this electronic transmission are those of the
>> individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the
>> sender is authorized to state them to be the views of SAP AG or any of
>> its subsidiaries. SAP AG, its subsidiaries, and their directors,
>> officers and employees make no representation nor accept any liability
>> for the accuracy or completeness of the views or information contained
>> herein. Please be aware that the furnishing of any pricing information/
>> business proposal herein is indicative only, is subject to change and
>> shall not be construed as an offer or as constituting a binding
>> agreement on the part of SAP AG or any of its subsidiaries to enter into
>> any relationship, unless otherwise expressly stated.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
>> Of Susan R. Keohan
>> Sent: Thursday, 20 October 2005 6:42 AM
>> To: SAP Workflow Users' Group
>> Subject: SRM 4.0 - Shopping Carts not going for release
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are in SRM 4.0. The standard WF for Shopping Cart with no
>> Approval (WS10000060) is initiated for our other developers and
>> configurers. But
>>
>> when I, the WF Admin, try to submit a cart, it is held, awaiting
>> approval. Is it the characteristics of the cart ? I don't think
>> so... when I run FM BBP_PDH_WFL_CHECK_BEFORE_START, it returns
>> WS1000060, so I
>>
>> believe it wants to start that workflow. Is it, gasp, me ?
>>
>> Perhaps. I ran BBP_CHECK_USERS on my ID, and received the following:
>> ' The user has no workflow linkage. Configure workflow.'
>>
>> Huh ?
>>
>> Drilling down on the error message gives the following text:
>> The user has no workflow linkage. Configure workflow.
>> Message no. BBPU_MESSAGES116
>> Diagnosis
>> The user has no workflow linkage. The relationship between position
>> (S) and user (US) does not exist.
>> System response
>> In workflow configuration (table T77S0) you can set the indicator
>> WFLOW/CRMUS to 'X'.
>> Procedure
>> You can set the indicator as follows:
>>
>> 1. Start transaction code *SM30*
>> <SAPEVENT:DOCU_LINK%5CDS:TRAN.SM30>
>> 2. Open table T77S0 (/Maintain/).
>> 3. Create the following new entry:
>> o Group: WFLOW
>>
>> o Semantic ID: CRMUS
>>
>> 4. Activate by setting the indicator to 'X'.
>> Important: This function is only available from Basis Release 6.1.
>>
>> One of our SRM consultants says the message is misleading, and that I
>> need to create my own org structure. Has anyone else seen anything
>> like this ?
>> Thanks, and happy WF-ing,
>> Sue
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Susan R. Keohan
SAP Workflow Developer
MIT Lincoln Laboratory
244 Wood Street
LI-200
Lexington, MA. 02420
781-981-3561
keohan at ll.mit.edu
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list