SRM4.0 PO workflow n step BADI
Stéphane Bailleul
bailleul_s at hotmail.com
Thu Nov 3 09:00:09 EST 2005
SRM 4.0 N Step Badi
Thanks for your information Jocelyn,
I have applied 843636 for the import parameter GUID and it now works
perfectly thanks.
Many thanks
stephane Bailleul
PS: It is Stephane (French male name not stephanie ;-) )
>From: sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>Reply-To: sap-wug at mit.edu
>To: sap-wug at mit.edu
>Subject: SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 12, Issue 11
>Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 02:07:21 -0500
>
>Send SAP-WUG mailing list submissions to
> sap-wug at mit.edu
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sap-wug-request at mit.edu
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> sap-wug-owner at mit.edu
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of SAP-WUG digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Workflow and Object attachments via Generic Object Services
> 2. Post Goods Issue (Ananth)
> 3. RE: Link in exchange to the workitem in sap worklace
> (Kjetil Kilhavn)
> 4. RE: - RSWUWFML2 (Kjetil Kilhavn)
> 5. Post Goods Issue (Ananth)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:10:26 -0500
>From: workflow99 at aol.com
>To: sap-wug at mit.edu
>Subject: Re: Workflow and Object attachments via Generic Object Services
>Message-ID: <8C7AE19BE6CBE58-8F8-4D33 at MBLK-M32.sysops.aol.com>
>In-Reply-To:
><87548400CF397141B3EA2B66CC2F7B9E124D66C3 at CORPMAIL1.corp.dayzim.com>
>References:
><87548400CF397141B3EA2B66CC2F7B9E124D66C3 at CORPMAIL1.corp.dayzim.com>
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="--------MailBlocks_8C7AE19BE6CBE58_8F8_4B48_MBLK-M32.sysops.aol.com"
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Message: 1
>
>
>----------MailBlocks_8C7AE19BE6CBE58_8F8_4B48_MBLK-M32.sysops.aol.com
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Hi Margaret,
>
>A while ago I was trying to do the opposite - take an attachment made in
>workflow and attach it to the object, to be visible in GOS.
>
>It is possible to do what you want. The GOS object ids are stored in table
>SRGBTBREL. You can get the attachment id and instantiate an SOFM object and
>bind it to the workflow/task. I am not sure about 4.6C but there may be
>some APIs that could be used to get the attachment list.
>
>Regards,
>Ramki Maley.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hilsbos, Margaret A <Margaret.Hilsbos at dayzim.com>
>To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Sent: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 17:08:15 -0500
>Subject: RE: Workflow and Object attachments via Generic Object Services
>
>
>Larry,
>
>Thanks for your response. A better description of my potential requirement:
>I
>have an object to which someone as attached a document via GOS, from the
>object
>maintenance screen (i.e. not in workflow at the time). Later an event on
>that
>object triggers a workflow. Is there any way to make any GOS attachments
>pass to
>the workflow so that they can be listed on the work item?
>
>However, it looks like this question is going to become academic, because
>we are
>now leaning toward using DMS records for the documents. Still, it would be
>interesting to know if this is possible.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Margaret
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]On Behalf
>Of lianghuan.x.hu at accenture.com
>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:15 PM
>To: sap-wug at mit.edu
>Subject: RE: Workflow and Object attachments via Generic Object Services
>
>
>Margaret:
>
>Just make sure I understand your question: Suppose you have a workflow
>to approve a purchase order, and when you display a particular PO, you
>click the Generic Object Services icon, what you want is to be able to
>see the log for the workflow instance for your PO.
>
>If so, you do not have to do anything. As long as the workflow has the
>business object (BUS2012 for PO), the SAP system provides this feature
>automatically. If the business object is not in your workflow, add it.
>
>Thanks,
>Larry
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
>Of Hilsbos, Margaret A
>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 8:59 AM
>To: SAP-WUG (E-mail)
>Subject: Workflow and Object attachments via Generic Object Services
>
>Hi WUG'ers,
>
>Is anyone familiar with how attachments made to an object via Generic
>Object Services show up, or can be made to show up, in work items or the
>workflow log, in 4.6c?
>
>Apologies that I haven't had a chance to test this myself yet but it
>would help me a lot if someone who knows this could share. Also if
>anyone knows where there is good documentation, SAP Help or whatever,
>for GOS attachments I would greatly appreciate it. The "Help" I've found
>so far is not very detailed and not especially helpful for my situation.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Margaret Hilsbos
>Day & Zimmermann
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>privileged,
>proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in
>error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any
>other
>use of the email by you is prohibited.
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>----------MailBlocks_8C7AE19BE6CBE58_8F8_4B48_MBLK-M32.sysops.aol.com
>Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
>
><HTML><BODY><DIV style='font-family: "Verdana"; font-size: 10pt;'><DIV>
><DIV>Hi Margaret,</DIV>
><DIV> </DIV>
><DIV>A while ago I was trying to do the opposite - take
>an attachment made in <SPAN class=correction id="">workflow</SPAN> and
>attach it to the object, to be visible in <SPAN class=correction
>id="">GOS</SPAN>. </DIV>
><DIV> </DIV>
><DIV>It is possible to do what you want. The <SPAN class=correction
>id="">GOS</SPAN> object <SPAN class=correction id="">ids</SPAN> are
>stored in table <SPAN class=correction id="">SRGBTBREL</SPAN>. You can get
>the attachment id and instantiate an <SPAN class=correction
>id="">SOFM</SPAN> object and bind it to the <SPAN class=correction
>id="">workflow</SPAN>/task. I am not sure about 4.6C
>but there may be some <SPAN class=correction id="">APIs</SPAN>
>that could be used to get the attachment list.</DIV>
><DIV> </DIV>
><DIV>Regards,</DIV>
><DIV><SPAN class=correction id="">Ramki</SPAN> <SPAN class=correction
>id="">Maley</SPAN>.</DIV>
><DIV> </DIV>
><DIV><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: Hilsbos, Margaret A
><Margaret.Hilsbos at dayzim.com><BR>To: SAP <SPAN class=correction
>id="">Workflow</SPAN> Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu><BR>Sent: Wed, 2
>Nov 2005 17:08:15 -0500<BR>Subject: RE: Workflow and Object attachments via
>Generic Object Services<BR><BR></DIV>
><STYLE>
>.AOLPlainTextBody {
> margin: 0px;
> font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, Sans-Serif;
> font-size: 12px;
> color: #000;
> background-color: #fff;
>}
>
>.AOLPlainTextBody pre {
> font-size: 9pt;
>}
>
>.AOLInlineAttachment {
> margin: 10px;
>}
>
>.AOLAttachmentHeader {
> border-bottom: 2px solid #E9EAEB;
> background: #F9F9F9;
>}
>
>.AOLAttachmentHeader .Title {
> font: 11px Tahoma;
> font-weight: bold;
> color: #666666;
> background: #E9EAEB;
> padding: 3px 0px 1px 10px;
>}
>
>.AOLAttachmentHeader .FieldLabel {
> font: 11px Tahoma;
> font-weight: bold;
> color: #666666;
> padding: 1px 10px 1px 9px;
>}
>
>.AOLAttachmentHeader .FieldValue {
> font: 11px Tahoma;
> color: #333333;
>}
>
></STYLE>
>
><DIV class=AOLPlainTextBody
>id=AOLMsgPart_0_300fb1ee-6cbd-4360-ac34-7f4ce83cd2e6><PRE><TT>Larry,
>
>Thanks for your response. A better description of my potential requirement:
>I
>have an object to which someone as attached a document via <SPAN
>class=correction id="">GOS</SPAN>, from the object
>maintenance screen (i.e. not in <SPAN class=correction
>id="">workflow</SPAN> at the time). Later an event on that
>object triggers a <SPAN class=correction id="">workflow</SPAN>. Is there
>any way to make any <SPAN class=correction id="">GOS</SPAN> attachments
>pass to
>the <SPAN class=correction id="">workflow</SPAN> so that they can be listed
>on the work item?
>
>However, it looks like this question is going to become academic, because
>we are
>now leaning toward using <SPAN class=correction id="">DMS</SPAN> records
>for the documents. Still, it would be
>interesting to know if this is possible.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Margaret
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: <A
>href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces%40mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu</A> [<A
>href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces%40mit.edu%5dOn"><SPAN class=correction
>id="">mailto</SPAN>:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu]On</A> Behalf
>Of <A
>href="mailto:lianghuan.x.hu%40accenture.com">lianghuan.x.hu at accenture.com</A>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 4:15 PM
>To: <A href="mailto:sap-wug%40mit.edu">sap-wug at mit.edu</A>
>Subject: RE: <SPAN class=correction id="">Workflow</SPAN> and Object
>attachments via Generic Object Services
>
>
>Margaret:
>
>Just make sure I understand your question: Suppose you have a <SPAN
>class=correction id="">workflow</SPAN>
>to approve a purchase order, and when you display a particular PO, you
>click the Generic Object Services icon, what you want is to be able to
>see the log for the <SPAN class=correction id="">workflow</SPAN> instance
>for your PO.
>
>If so, you do not have to do anything. As long as the <SPAN
>class=correction id="">workflow</SPAN> has the
>business object (<SPAN class=correction id="">BUS2012</SPAN> for PO), the
>SAP system provides this feature
>automatically. If the business object is not in your <SPAN class=correction
>id="">workflow</SPAN>, add it.
>
>Thanks,
>Larry
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: <A
>href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces%40mit.edu">sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu</A> [<A
>href="mailto:sap-wug-bounces%40mit.edu"><SPAN class=correction
>id="">mailto</SPAN>:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu</A>] On Behalf
>Of Hilsbos, Margaret A
>Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 8:59 AM
>To: SAP-WUG (E-mail)
>Subject: <SPAN class=correction id="">Workflow</SPAN> and Object
>attachments via Generic Object Services
>
>Hi <SPAN class=correction id="">WUG'ers</SPAN>,
>
>Is anyone familiar with how attachments made to an object via Generic
>Object Services show up, or can be made to show up, in work items or the
>workflow log, in 4.6c?
>
>Apologies that I haven't had a chance to test this myself yet but it
>would help me a lot if someone who knows this could share. Also if
>anyone knows where there is good documentation, SAP Help or whatever,
>for <SPAN class=correction id="">GOS</SPAN> attachments I would greatly
>appreciate it. The "Help" I've found
>so far is not very detailed and not especially helpful for my situation.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Margaret Hilsbos
>Day & <SPAN class=correction id="">Zimmermann</SPAN>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
><A href="mailto:SAP-WUG%40mit.edu">SAP-WUG at mit.edu</A>
><A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug"
>target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
>
>
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
>privileged,
>proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in
>error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any
>other
>use of the email by you is prohibited.
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
><A href="mailto:SAP-WUG%40mit.edu">SAP-WUG at mit.edu</A>
><A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug"
>target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
><A href="mailto:SAP-WUG%40mit.edu">SAP-WUG at mit.edu</A>
><A href="http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug"
>target=_blank>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug</A>
></TT></PRE></DIV><!-- end of
>AOLMsgPart_0_300fb1ee-6cbd-4360-ac34-7f4ce83cd2e6
>--></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>----------MailBlocks_8C7AE19BE6CBE58_8F8_4B48_MBLK-M32.sysops.aol.com--
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:37:14 +0600
>From: Ananth <write2ananth at gmail.com>
>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
>Subject: Post Goods Issue
>Message-ID: <7e1903b20511022137v72957a87o222577db4a350d8 at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Message: 2
>
>Hi All,
>
>I have a scenario like this.
>
>After the Delivery order is created by User1 using VL01N transaction,
>then the workitem is sent to the User2 to do VL02N to put in extra
>details and also do Post Goods Issue. After this is done, then
>workitem is sent to User3 to create Invoice for the Delivery Order
>created. All are done in the same flow.
>
>But the problem is after putting the details, if the User2 does not do
>the Post Goods Issue, then the delivery order is not complete and
>therefore User3 cannot do the invoice for that delivery.
>
>I created an event PostGoodsIssue event for the Customized business
>object (LIKP) and using Status management (BSVW)
>
>Status OT = VBK
>Business Object = ZLIKP
>Event = PostGoodsIssue
>
>Status Restriction has been set to PSTO ( Post Goods Issue) and put
>that Wait Event in the workflow.
>
>When I trigger the workflow, and after the User2 puts in the details
>of the delivery order and does not do Post Goods issue initially. A
>notification mail is sent to the user to do the Post Goods Issue, the
>user executes the VL02N transaction outside workflow and does the Post
>Goods Issue, but the wait event doesnt seem to be triggering for the
>workflow to continue.
>
>Can somebody let me know, how the PGI wait can be triggered, so that
>the flow is completed or is there something I am missing here.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Ananth
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:40:35 +0100
>From: "Kjetil Kilhavn" <KJETILK at statoil.com>
>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Subject: RE: Link in exchange to the workitem in sap worklace
>Message-ID: <273AA3C12CC7C54DA3C0C33F3857FE5C59C1FD at ST-EXCL03.statoil.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Message: 3
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Kobi Levi
> > Sent: 2. november 2005 15:14
> > To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> > Subject: RE: Link in exchange to the workitem in sap worklace
> >
> > The program u mentioned -RSWUWFML2 provide u to sent shortcut
> > to the sap workplace and if u have single sighn on u don't
> > have to enter pas and user (logon details).
> >
> > My wuestion is how to customize it
>
>I'm sorry, but I don't understand your question. Please take more time to
>inform everyone on this list what you are trying to do, where it fails, and
>what you have found out so far. It is really frustrating having to read
>between the lines, and often I don't get what I am reading there right.
>
>Your problem is to customize *what*?
>
>The report RSWUWFML2 can't be customized - unless you by customizing mean
>creating a variant. In our case we had to extend the report to be able to
>pass a long GuiParm string in the shortcut (the parameter in the program is
>limited in length) for single sign-on to work. We have chosen to make a few
>other modifications too, but they are not necessary for single sign-on.
>Depending on your single sign-on setup you may be able to cope without
>modifications.
>
>For general mail customizing I am of no help to (yo)u, I barely know a few
>of the transaction codes. If you have a basis or infrastructure person
>he/she should be more knowledgeable.
>
>For single sign-on setup I am definitely of no help to you. I have no idea
>about it at all. Again the basis or infrastructure experts should be called
>in.
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:25:25 +0100
> > From: "Kjetil Kilhavn" <KJETILK at statoil.com>
> > To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > Subject: RE: Link in exchange to the workitem in sap worklace
> >
> > If it has to be a link I can't help you. We use the .SAP
> > attachment from RSWUWFML2 and it works but (in our case)
> > required modification (read enhancement :-) of RSWUWFML2.
> >
> > What exactly is your problem, and how does your single sign-on work?
> > --
> > Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil ØFT KTJ ITS BKS SAP Basis
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Kobi Levi
> > > Sent: 2. november 2005 10:07
> > > To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> > > Subject: Link in exchange to the workitem in sap worklace
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > How can I make a link in the url text
> > (se38-RSWUWFML-standard text for
> > > notification)to work item in the sap business workplace .
> > > I need that the user who get the message in the exchanfe will have
> > > single sighn on to the work item in sap business workplace.
> > > Thanks
> > > Koby levy
>
>
>PS: Is there too much bandwidth in the world? Hard drives too cheap? People
>don't think they get enough hits on search engines? There must be some
>reason why no-one bothers to remove irrelevant text from e-mail anymore.
>I'm pretty bad at it myself compared to how it used to be 10 years ago when
>most e-mail programs defaulted to indenting the original message so you
>could answer questions where they were asked instead of two pages higher
>up. Ahhh, the good old days of standard e-mail ...
>--
>Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil ØFT KTJ ITS BKS SAP Basis - and I appreciate it if
>you delete Statoil's (and other) company disclaimers when you reply to this
>message, since that helps the readability.
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
>intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
>information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
>addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
>this message.
>Thank you.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:48:07 +0100
>From: "Kjetil Kilhavn" <KJETILK at statoil.com>
>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Subject: RE: - RSWUWFML2
>Message-ID: <273AA3C12CC7C54DA3C0C33F3857FE5C59C207 at ST-EXCL03.statoil.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Message: 4
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Srinivasan Ramanan
> > Sent: 2. november 2005 18:22
> > To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> > Subject: RE: - RSWUWFML2
> >
> > What enhancement is required in the program RSWUWFML2 to get
> > the file as .SAP file....
>
>I have absolutely no idea. It worked right out of the SAP box without me
>configuring anything at all. The wonderful world of shrink-wrapped
>software!
>
> > In my case when I re-name the contents of the shotcut file
> > with .SAP extension it works...
>
>A good start.
>
>
> > My SAP connect configuration permits all formats to be sent
> > thru internet.
>
>So then it must be some place between your SAP box and your e-mail inbox
>the attachment is converted to standard text inside the message body.
>Afraid I can't help you there.
>
>
> > If you have done any modifications in the program RSWUWFML2
> > please let me know
>I won't go through them all here. We have done nothing to get attachments
>working as they should, and since your attachment works after renaming
>works you shouldn't need any modifications for that purpose.
>
> > thanks
> > Srinivasan
> >
> >
> > >From: "Kjetil Kilhavn" <KJETILK at statoil.com>
> > >Reply-To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > >To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
> > >Subject: RE: - RSWUWFML2
> > >Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:28:11 +0100
> > >
> > >It worked when we was on that patch level, but we get an
> > attachment in
> > >our e-mails, not a URL.
> > >In any case it seems your attachment is being unpacked. I
> > suppose this
> > >must happen either in SAP, in the mail sender on your application
> > >server, or on your incoming e-mail server. It sounds strange
> > that the
> > >incoming e-mail server should unpack it, so I would guess
> > one of the other two.
> > >
> > >The message should be OK with attachments from RSWUWFML2, so I would
> > >start by checking the outgoing e-mail (transaction = SOST?) and the
> > >configuration of the mail service. I'm afraid I can't help
> > you with the
> > >details, I have never seen the setup of mail services.
> > >--
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu
> > > > [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf Of Srinivasan Ramanan
> > > > Sent: 1. november 2005 22:54
> > > > To: sap-wug at mit.edu
> > > > Subject: - RSWUWFML2
> > > >
> > > > Hi ,
> > > >
> > > > SAP 4.6C..patch level .....46C48
> > > >
> > > > SAPCONNECT is configured and sening regular emails OK
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to send workitems as executable attachements using
> > > > RSWUWFML2
> > > >
> > > > I get all text in e-mail insted of link to SAP shortcut that is
> > > > clickable
> > > >
> > > > example :
> > > >
> > > > Open the SAP shortcut attachment in order to process the
> > work item.
> > > >
> > > > If you have any problems logging on, contact your system
> > > > administrator.
> > > > [System]
> > > > Name=S2C
> > > > Description=
> > > > Client=040
> > > > [User]
> > > > Name=SRAMANAN
> > > >
> > > > etc., etc.,
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone tell me what is the probelm...
> > > > Is there any specific conversion rule required to end SAP
> > shortcuts
> > > > as attachements in the e-mails
> > > >
> > > > thanks in advance
>--
>Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil ØFT KTJ ITS BKS SAP Basis - and I appreciate it if
>you delete Statoil's (and other) company disclaimers when you reply to this
>message, since that helps the readability.
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
>intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
>information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
>addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
>this message.
>Thank you.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 13:06:58 +0600
>From: Ananth <write2ananth at gmail.com>
>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <SAP-WUG at mit.edu>
>Subject: Post Goods Issue
>Message-ID: <7e1903b20511022306s339f3a2cudc529cebe3eeafa4 at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>Precedence: list
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>Message: 5
>
>Hi All,
>
>I have a scenario like this.
>
>After the Delivery order is created by User1 using VL01N transaction,
>then the workitem is sent to the User2 to do VL02N to put in extra
>details and also do Post Goods Issue. After this is done, then
>workitem is sent to User3 to create Invoice for the Delivery Order
>created. All are done in the same flow.
>
>But the problem is after putting the details, if the User2 does not do
>the Post Goods Issue, then the delivery order is not complete and
>therefore User3 cannot do the invoice for that delivery.
>
>I created an event PostGoodsIssue event for the Customized business
>object (LIKP) and using Status management (BSVW)
>
>Status OT = VBK
>Business Object = ZLIKP
>Event = PostGoodsIssue
>
>Status Restriction has been set to PSTO ( Post Goods Issue) and put
>that Wait Event in the workflow.
>
>When I trigger the workflow, and after the User2 puts in the details
>of the delivery order and does not do Post Goods issue initially. A
>notification mail is sent to the user to do the Post Goods Issue, the
>user executes the VL02N transaction outside workflow and does the Post
>Goods Issue, but the wait event doesnt seem to be triggering for the
>workflow to continue.
>
>Can somebody let me know, how the PGI wait can be triggered, so that
>the flow is completed or is there something I am missing here.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Ananth
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>
>
>End of SAP-WUG Digest, Vol 12, Issue 11
>***************************************
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list