2 year wait vs Batch Report

Alon Raskin araskin at 3i-consulting.com
Thu May 5 11:35:02 EDT 2005


huh.. that's nothing. I once started executing tasks of another user thinking that I was in the QA environment. Three guesses what system I was actually logged into?
 
Alon Raskin
e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com <mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com> 
w: http://www.3i-consulting.com

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu on behalf of Peter Roehlen
Sent: Thu 5/5/2005 11:08
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: Re: 2 year wait vs Batch Report


Hi Ram,
 
Make sure you look me up when you write your book.  I'm sure that I've got more than a couple of contributions I can make from my own painful experiences.  For example, have you ever brought a companies mail system to a screaming halt by moving a new general task into PRD and forgetting to set the 'terminate if role resolution has no result' on the standard role?  (Trust me, I'm a workflow expert... : )
 
Anyway, it's all good fun.
 
Cheers - Peter.  



	Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 20:17:50 +0530
	From: "Tiwari, Rammanohar" <rammanohar.tiwari at logicacmg.com>
	To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
	Subject: RE: 2 year wait vs Batch Report
	
	
	Hi Peter,
	 
	I knew that 0.1 second is too much for this :) but I used it just for comparison purpose ( And to make you check your system and come up with some real time stats ).
	 
	But this is not the major mistake I made actually.
	I didn't consider that even SAP's system programs need to do some checking to start the scheduled jobs after 2 year ( I think almost every second along with all other scheduled jobs )
	 
	But then all is not lost . I will use this example when I'll write a book called "SAP for Stupid" :-). I've gathered a lot of these , mostly my own contributions ...
	 
	Cheers,
	Ram



________________________________

Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies. <http://au.rd.yahoo.com/mail/tagline/*http://au.movies.yahoo.com> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 6344 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20050505/3fdc11dc/attachment.bin


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list