Transaction message lost in UWL

[Kjetil Kilhavn]

For what it is worth: I agree. Of course the more specific message from the
transaction is most important.
We don't use UWL, so I don't know much about it. It would be better if you
had a "message console" with a short message history. It could even drain
itself by setting a timer to remove the message after a minute to avoid
confusing users who return to the UWL after doing something else for a
while.

I can tell SAP has learned something from their co-operation with
Microsoft. The art of saying: we know best.
They just need a " - so sod off!" at the end to make the arrogance
complete.
--
Kjetil Kilhavn - who uses SuSE Linux at home since IBM gave up on OS/2 (if
only they would port SOM and WPS to Linux...)




                                                                                                                                              
                    Michael                                                                                                                   
                    Pokraka              To:     SAP Workflow User Group <sap-wug at mit.edu>                                                    
                    <workflow at qui        cc:     (bcc: Kjetil Kilhavn)                                                                        
                    rky.me.uk>           Subject:     Transaction message lost in UWL                                                         
                    Sent by:                                                                                                                  
                    sap-wug-bounc                                                                                                             
                    es at mit.edu                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                              
                    07.03.2005                                                                                                                
                    17:15                                                                                                                     
                    Please                                                                                                                    
                    respond to                                                                                                                
                    "SAP Workflow                                                                                                             
                    Users' Group"                                                                                                             
                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                              




Hi all,
An annoying 'feature' of the UWL is that it doesn't display a transaction's
message when a WI is executed. Instead of e.g. "Document 5200011111
posted", it
comes back with "Work item executed (new processing status: "Completed")".

Yes, I've posted this to the list before and had no replies. However in the
meantime I've also queried this with OSS and have had a partial answer:
This
works as designed.

Now, I think that the message from a transaction is possibly important. I
didn't get any definite answer from OSS yet, it has been passed on to
development. I would however like to get some feedback from folks 'out
there'
if anyone has found this to be a problem in their environment, and/or how
important this is - just to get an idea of whether my client is the only
one
who thinks that a lack of feedback from the transaction is a critical
shortcoming (and I agree).

Any comments appreciated,
Cheers
Mike

_______________________________________________
SAP-WUG mailing list
SAP-WUG at mit.edu
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug




-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.