SWW_WI_START_SIMPLE container

[Kjetil Kilhavn]

Previous posts already deleted.... mailbox space is a precious thing!
 
Anyway, why do you expect anything in the container (I assume what you
mean is that you expect something back from SWW_WI_START_SIMPLE)? The
container is for passing parameters *to* the workflow.
 
The only case in which you perhaps (I started looking at the function
but gave up...) may expect something back is when you start a work
*item*. Normally a multistep task won't complete in time for the
function to return anything.
-- 
Kjetil Kilhavn, Statoil KTJ IT BKS
 

________________________________

From: sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu [mailto:sap-wug-bounces at mit.edu] On Behalf
Of Alon Raskin
Sent: 18. juli 2005 20:25
To: sap-wug at mit.edu
Subject: SWW_WI_START_SIMPLE container


I am using FM SWW_WI_START_SIMPLE to call a synchronous WF (see previous
postings earlier today). Everything seems to be fine but the only thing
I noticed is that the container (table parameter WI_CONTAINER) is empty
and does not contain any of the EXPORTING container parameters.
 
I know I can use the WAPI to read the container from the DB but I was
trying to save the hit to the DB and just get the container value back
from the FM. Anyone ever do this in the past?
 
Alon Raskin
e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com <mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com> 
p: +61 3 9625 2189 (Head Office)
f:  +61 3 8610 1239 
c:  +1 207 756 0370
w: http://www.3i-consulting.com


-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/sap-wug/attachments/20050719/82684616/attachment.htm