How to start a workflow in a particular date.

[Sathish]

Requested start in the first step\activity can be used. But 
if the first step of the workflow is like condition, fork, 
etc., then empty step can be used.

Regards,
Sathish



---- Original message ----
>Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:53:36 +0100
>From: Mark Pyc <mark.pyc at gmail.com>  
>Subject: Re: How to start a workflow in a particular date.  
>To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <sap-wug at mit.edu>
>
>Good point Jim. There is absolutely no need for the empty 
step. Dunno
>what I was thinking. The Requested Start is the way forward.
>
>Have fun,
>Mark
>
>On 4/21/05, Jim Sauceman <sauceman at tennessee.edu> wrote:
>> Biswajit,
>> 
>> I have a similar situation in which I trigger the 
Workflow, but its initial
>> step has a Requested Start date of my desired execution 
date thus the
>> Workflow doesn't really do anything until then. There may 
be more elegant
>> solutions, but this approach has some advantages in our 
situation. Hope this
>> helps.
>> 
>> Good luck!
>> Jim Sauceman ...................... sauceman at tennessee.edu
>University of
>> Tennessee 
>> 
>> 
>> Biswajit wrote: 
>> 
>
>
>
>
>I have to trigger a workflow through a report..
>
>But the problem is I
>> have to trigger the workflow on the 1st of the next
>month of the month in
>> which the report runs.
>
>
>For example If report(to trigger workflow) runs on
>> 22ndapril then workflow
>should trigger on 1st MAY.
>
>If report runs on 15th
>> May then workflow should get started on 1st
>> of
>June..
>
>
>
>********************************DISCLAIMER*******************
****************
>> Information contained and transmitted by this e-mail is 
confidential
>> and
>proprietary to Tata Steel Ltd. and is intended for use only 
by
>> the
>addressee. If you are not the intended recipient , you are 
notified
>> that
>any dissemination or copying of this e-mail is strictly 
prohibited and
>> you
>are requested to delete this e-mail immediately and notify 
the
>> originator.
>Tata Steel does not enter into any binding agreement with any
>> party by
>e-mail. Any views expressed by an individual do not 
necessarily
>> reflect the
>view of Tata Steel. Tata Steel is not responsible for the
>> consequences of
>any actions taken on the basis of information provided.
>> While this e-mail
>has been checked for all known viruses the addressee
>> should also scan for
>viruses. To know more about Tata Steel please visit
>> www.tatasteel.com
>*************************************************************
*******************
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG
>> mailing
>> list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> SAP-WUG mailing list
>> SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>SAP-WUG mailing list
>SAP-WUG at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/sap-wug