Automatic use of subtype

[Michael Pokraka]

Ahhhh, yes that would be it. We have another HR-only system which I didn'=
t
check, and it behaves the same there.
It appears to be some kind of hardcoded delegation as long as USR01 isn't
delegated.... not sure if I agree with the way that's been set up as it i=
s a
bit confusing, but as long as we know what's going on I suppose we can wo=
rk
with it. I was in fact pondering on adding similar extensions to USR01 a
while back, so it helps us a little.
 
Thanks, at least I'll get a decent night's sleep not worrying about that =
one
anymore...
Mike
 
Dart, Jocelyn wrote:
> As USR01DOHR is the HR-specific version of USR01 - do you perhaps have =
the
> HR module installed?
> Jocelyn
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Michael Pokraka
> Sent: Tuesday,7 September 2004 10:39 PM
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: Automatic use of subtype
>
> Treats indeed! OK, the problem is no longer a problem as we've worked a=
round
> it for this particular instance, but I'd love to know what the story is=
 -
> and it is a bit worriesome...
>
> It happens in one DEV system (tried in it 4 other dev and sandpit syste=
ms we
> have - fine everywhere else). For obvious reasons haven't transported i=
t
> anywhere else. I created another subtype ZUSR01, and behaviour is as be=
fore.
> I delegated to ZUSR01, and we were back to seeing USR01 attributes + th=
e
> delegated one. Removed delegation and USR01 goes back to the original
> problem.
>
> Oh, and Guy - I tried your suggestion: Bizarrely USR01 is not used in a=
ny
> TS9nnnn custom tasks according to SAP (Though we disagree....). Neither=
 is
> USR01DOHR, so perhaps this is SAP's way of pretending nothing's wrong.
>
> Fun fun fun...
> Thanks both for your input,
> Cheers
> Mike
>
> Mark Pyc wrote:
>> Ah, Mr Pokraka, the treats you come up with.
>>
>> Is this in a DEV box or is it further along the transport chain?
>>
>> Are there bespoke Z subtypes for USR01? Could you create one (and
>> transport
>> it through?) just to try and rattle the cage as it were?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>                       Michael Pokraka
>>                       <workflow at quirky.me         To:
>> SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>>                       .uk>                        cc:
>>                       Sent by: SAP                Subject: Automatic u=
se
>> of
>> subtype
>>                       Workflow
>>                       <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITV
>>                       MA.MIT.EDU>
>>
>>
>>                       07 Sep 2004 10:57
>>                       Please respond to
>>                       SAP Workflow Users'
>>                       Group
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Greetings,
>> A strange thing is happening on one system (all others are fine):
>> The USR01 object seems to default to it's subtype when we attempt to u=
se
>> it
>> in a task. There is NO delegation, what we see happening is that the
>> object
>> (USR01) is used in a task container, however it's attributes are those=
 of
>> it's subtype USR01DOHR.
>> This is most perplexing as other objects are fine. Only this object, a=
nd
>> only on this one system (we have a few dev and sandboxes).
>> Please help preserve some sanity.......
>> Cheers
>> Mike
>>
>>
>
>