Change a Workflow-Definition without manually copying

[Alon Raskin]

Hi Everyone,
=20
Why don't you all mail me your SAP Workflow wish list requests and I =
will add it to the www.wugarchive.com web site. Who knows maybe SAP will =
like some of the ideas and implement them?
=20
Please mail me directly and I will do my best to get your =
ideas/suggestions up on the site ASAP.
 
Regards,
=20
Alon Raskin
e: araskin at 3i-consulting.com <mailto:araskin at 3i-consulting.com>=20
w: http://www.3i-consulting.com
 
________________________________
 
From: SAP Workflow on behalf of Michael Pokraka
Sent: Tue 23/11/2004 11:01
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Change a Workflow-Definition without manually copying
 
 
 
Hi Ute,
A case for a subflow? Cut/paste? Anything already in a loop/condition =
gets
copied as a complete block, so unless it's a loooong 50-step linear flow =
it
should be doable in a few minutes.
But a multiple selection copy/paste operation is also somewhere on my
wishlist (not near the top I have to admit).
Cheers
Mike
 
"Schr=F6der, Ute Marion" wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I=B4m expierencing a problem in changing my workflow-definition via =
SWDD.
> I=B4m quite sure that I=B4m doing something wrong, unfortunately I
> cannot find a solution on my own.
>
> If got a complex Workflow and now I=B4ve to add a  condition way up in =
the
> definition so that  about
> 50 steps would have to be translated into the "true"-exit,
> whereas the "false"-exit would habve to be newly implemented.
> The difficulty is to take the flow consisting of about 50 steps and =
put it
> into the true-exit.
> Is there anyway to do this automatically or do I have to take every =
step and
> copy it manually?
>
> Oh yeah, I forgot, we are on 4.7, WAS 620.
>
> Thanx for any help
>
>
>> Ute
>
>