Change a Workflow-Definition without manually copying

[Michael Pokraka]

Hi Ute,
A case for a subflow? Cut/paste? Anything already in a loop/condition get=
s
copied as a complete block, so unless it's a loooong 50-step linear flow =
it
should be doable in a few minutes.
But a multiple selection copy/paste operation is also somewhere on my
wishlist (not near the top I have to admit).
Cheers
Mike
 
"Schr=F6der, Ute Marion" wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I=B4m expierencing a problem in changing my workflow-definition via SWD=
D.
> I=B4m quite sure that I=B4m doing something wrong, unfortunately I
> cannot find a solution on my own.
>
> If got a complex Workflow and now I=B4ve to add a  condition way up in =
the
> definition so that  about
> 50 steps would have to be translated into the "true"-exit,
> whereas the "false"-exit would habve to be newly implemented.
> The difficulty is to take the flow consisting of about 50 steps and put=
 it
> into the true-exit.
> Is there anyway to do this automatically or do I have to take every ste=
p and
> copy it manually?
>
> Oh yeah, I forgot, we are on 4.7, WAS 620.
>
> Thanx for any help
>
>
>> Ute
>
>