Header problems with e-mail messages.... - UPDATE
Michael Pokraka
workflow at quirky.me.uk
Tue May 4 10:24:50 EDT 2004
Hi Edwin,
Just an opinion, but personally I'd avoid custom reply-to's in workflows =
for
reasons of consistency. Users should know never to reply to anything comi=
ng
from '<xyz> System', period.
If they can reply to certain items but not others it could get a bit
confusing and you could end up with folks replying to deadline notificati=
ons
and all kinds of stuff, and you need to think about reply-to's all the ti=
me.
I'd prefer to stick to an informative message on how to proceed - or even
better is the mailto: suggestion of Jeffrey's.
Actually forwarding WF-BATCH's mail to the workflow admin is also a must =
for
the same reason.
Cheers
Mike
Edwin Mukusha wrote:
> Thank you Jeffrey. I had never thought of the 'mailto:' option. That w=
ill
> indeed give me yet another work-around. It works great in Lotus because
> lotus will highlight mailto line for you with a flashing underline. The=
n
> when you click the hyperlink Lotus ignores your 'default e-mail program=
'
> settings in Internet Explorer and creates a new (Memo) message within
> Lotus!
> I had already figured out how to vary the sender address on each e-mail=
.
> However the reply-to address that I am after is separate from the sende=
r.
>
> I am still determined to be able to specify both the sender (from:) and=
be
> able to specify a separate reply-to: address. This would allow the use=
r to
> get an e-mail in their inbox and see the fixed system e-mail address f=
rom
> wf-batch and know straightaway that this is an SAP workflow message. W=
hen
> the user clicks reply, the message header will automatically be filled =
with
> a varying reply-to address directing replies to the appropriate contact=
for
> that business process.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Edwin Mukusha
>
>
>
>
> |---------+---------------------------->
> | | "Jeffrey A. |
> | | Rappaport" |
> | | <Jeff at Business-Wo|
> | | rkflow.com> |
> | | |
> | | 05/03/2004 05:47 |
> | | PM |
> |---------+---------------------------->
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------=
------------------------------------------|
> |
> |
> | To: "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU=
>,
> Edwin Mukusha <emukusha at nebraska.edu> |
> | cc: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> |
> | Subject: Re: Header problems with e-mail messages.... - UPDA=
TE
> |
> >--------------------------------------------------------------------=
------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
> Edwin,
>
> If the reply email address will always be the same, change
> WF-Batch's email address to the 'Reply To' address, this way the
> Users just need to hit Reply on the email. If the reply addresses
> vary, you can place a hyperlink in the body of the message like:
> 'mailto:emukusha at nebraska.edu?subject=3DHello from Edwin'
>
> etc....etc...
>
> Jeffrey A. Rappaport
> Business Workflow, LLC
> Voice:(732)355-0123
> Fax: (509)757-4144
> Email:Jeff at Business-Workflow.com
> Web: www.Business-Workflow.com
>
>
> Quoting Edwin Mukusha <emukusha at nebraska.edu>:
>
>> Hello fellow workflowers,
>>
>> I just thought I would give you all an update on my quest to do the
>> seemingly simple; specify a reply-to address in an e-mail out of
>> SAP on
>> version 4.6C. The last time I left it with you all was that I was
>> going to
>> log my problem with SAP as an OSS note. After two explicit notes to
>> them
>> SAP is not willing to look at my problem because they feel that FM
>> SO_OBJECT_SEND is not released for customer use as per OSS note
>> 109533. So
>> I have to get my problem solved through remote consulting so that I
>> can be
>> charged a fee. This is a route that I will probably have to
>> pursue, and as
>> soon as I find a solution I will be sure to post it for you all.
>> In the
>> mean time I thought I would ask once again:
>>
>> Has anyone ever been able to specify a reply-to address on an
>> e-mail
>> emanating from the SAP system (4.6C)?
>>
>> What irks me about this whole issue is that I am trying to
>> something that
>> is standard functionality within e-mail systems worldwide.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Edwin.
>>
>>
>>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------
>
>>
>> Eduardo,
>>
>> Sorry maybe I was not clear enough in my last note. What I meant
>> was that
>> I have not managed to get the reply-to option in FM SO_OBJECT_SEND
>> using
>> the structure SOOS1. I can get function module to send out mail
>> fine but
>> mail header options do not seem to be working. To be more precise
>> the
>> parameter msg_rcpt-repextnam =3D 'user2 at xxxxxx.edu' is supposed to
>> specify
>> the 'reply-to' address and instead it only populates the 'from:'
>> address.
>>
>> I am getting the impression that the function module has a bug so I
>> am
>> going to go ahead and lodge (an official complaint) an OSS note
>> with SAP.
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> |---------+--------------------------------->
>> | | Eduardo Pisatti |
>> | | <Eduardo.Pisatti at basf-|
>> | | arg.com.ar> |
>> | | Sent by: SAP Workflow |
>> | | <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.|
>> | | MIT.EDU> |
>> | | |
>> | | |
>> | | 04/26/2004 06:10 PM |
>> | | Please respond to "SAP|
>> | | Workflow Users' Group"|
>> |---------+--------------------------------->
>>
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------|
>
>> |
>> |
>> | To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>> |
>> | cc:
>> |
>> | Subject: Re: Header problems with e-mail messages....
>> |
>>
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------|
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Edwin,
>>
>> Tell me what you have in RCPTMAIL?. if you have in this one a
>> PDF or
>> Spool i can send to you another functions using for this.
>>
>> We send in PASUNTO =3D only a text (subject), not need any more.
>>
>> And please see if you have applied the notes 676985 (email
>> address for
>> email printer not in spool), before applied this notes we not send
>> any
>> mail, after yes.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Edwin Mukusha
>> <emukusha at nebraska. Para:
>> SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>> edu> cc:
>> Enviado por: SAP Asunto: Re:
>> Header
>> problems with e-mail messages....
>> Workflow
>> <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITV
>> MA.MIT.EDU>
>>
>>
>> 26/04/2004 16:00
>> Por favor, responda
>> a "SAP Workflow
>> Users' Group"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Eduardo,
>>
>> Thank you very much for your quick response. I had also tried
>> using FM
>> SO_OBJECT_SEND and it does not work. Please tell me if you have
>> ever
>> actually go it to work and what parameters I have to specify in
>> what
>> combination to get it to work. My SOOS1 structure in my program
>> reads as
>> seen below.
>>
>> I finally got my other second option to work. The one were I prefix
>> the
>> sender's e-mail address with a descriptive text to show the e-mail
>> was an
>> SAP generated message. (Refer to my original message). But I would
>> like to
>> still get the reply-to option to work. Thank you.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________________________________=
_
>> data: msg_body like soli occurs 0,
>> msg_rcpt like soos1 occurs with header line,
>> hd_change like sood1.
>>
>> start-of-selection.
>>
>> clear msg_body.
>> append 'This is the body of the message.' to msg_body.
>> append 'It is great!' to msg_body.
>>
>> clear msg_rcpt.
>> msg_rcpt-sel =3D 'X'.
>> msg_rcpt-recextnam =3D 'user1 at xxxxxx.edu'.
>> msg_rcpt-recesc =3D 'U'.
>> msg_rcpt-repextnam =3D 'user2 at xxxxxx.edu'.
>> msg_rcpt-repesc =3D 'U'.
>> * msg_rcpt-sndnam =3D 'USERIDHERE'.
>> msg_rcpt-sndex =3D 'X'.
>> append msg_rcpt.
>>
>> clear hd_change.
>> hd_change-objla =3D sy-langu.
>> hd_change-o
> bjnam =3D 'RCPTMAIL'.
>> hd_change-objdes =3D 'This is the subject line.'.
>> hd_change-file_ext =3D 'RAW'.
>> hd_change-objlen =3D 510.
>>
>> call function 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
>> exporting
>> object_hd_change =3D hd_change
>> object_type =3D 'RAW'
>> outbox_flag =3D 'X'
>> tables
>> objcont =3D msg_body
>> receivers =3D msg_rcpt
>> exceptions
>> active_user_not_exist =3D 1
>> communication_failure =3D 2
>> component_not_available =3D 3
>> folder_not_exist =3D 4
>> folder_no_authorization =3D 5
>> forwarder_not_exist =3D 6
>> note_not_exist =3D 7
>> object_not_exist =3D 8
>> object_no_authorization =3D 9
>> object_type_not_exist =3D 10
>> operation_no_authorization =3D 11
>> owner_not_exist =3D 12
>> parameter_error =3D 13
>> substitute_not_active =3D 14
>> substitute_not_defined =3D 15
>> system_failure =3D 16
>> too_much_receivers =3D 17
>> user_not_exist =3D 18
>> originator_not_exist =3D 19
>> originator_not_exist =3D 19
>> x_error =3D 20.
>>
>> if sy-subrc <> 0.
>> message e999(zh) with 'Function module returned:' sy-subrc.
>> endif.
>>
> _______________________________________________________________________=
_
>>
>>
>>
>> |---------+--------------------------------->
>> | | Eduardo Pisatti |
>> | | <Eduardo.Pisatti at basf-|
>> | | arg.com.ar> |
>> | | Sent by: SAP Workflow |
>> | | <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.|
>> MIT.EDU> |
>> | | |
>> | | |
>> | | 04/26/2004 01:26 PM |
>> | | Please respond to "SAP|
>> | | Workflow Users'
>> Group"|
>>
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------|
>
>>
>>
>> |
>> |
>> | To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>> |
>> | cc:
>> |
>> | Subject: Re: Header problems with e-mail messages....
>> |
>>
>>
>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------|
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Edwin,
>>
>> The following is used by us to send mail, internal and external,
>> may be
>> this can help you.
>> In OSSS1 you can put for example: From, To (extern mail address),
>> email of
>> reply (external too), etc.
>>
>> FUNCTION ZAR_EMAIL.
>>
>
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list