Error handling in the background task

Fri Mar 19 10:28:18 EST 2004

Hello Dan,

I have the exception set as an 'Temporary error'. But I recognized the
problem & fixed it as it dumps probably even before hitting the exception.

Thanks to everyone for their inputs..

Swami Bala

----- Original Message -----
From: "Getliffe, Daniel" <dan.getliffe at sap.com>
To: <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 3:02 AM
Subject: Re: Error handling in the background task

> Test the method independently in SWO1 and ensure that it returns the
exception if no superior can be found.  Have you got the exception set as an
application error?
>
>
> Dan Getliffe
> Workflow Consultant - Technology Consulting
>
> SAP (UK) Ltd
> Clockhouse Place, Bedfont Road,
> Feltham, Middlesex TW14 8HD
>
> T   +44 (0)20 8917 8113
> F   +44 (0)20 8917 6461
> M  +44 (0)7764 978113
> E   dan.getliffe at sap.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of
'Mark Pyc'
> Sent: 19 March 2004 08:26
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: Error handling in the background task
>
>
> Check ABAP dumps to make sure that the function has ended correctly.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Swami Bala <swam_in at hotmail.com>
> Sent by: SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
> 18/03/2004 19:29
> Please respond to SAP Workflow Users' Group
>
>
>         To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>         cc:
>         Subject:        Re: Error handling in the background task
>
>
> Thanks Mike. That's exactly what I did. I have exit_return statement built
> into the method.
> But during exceptions, the wflow log indicates that the workitem is in
> process but in fact it hangs.The status of wf shows that it is 'In
> process'.
>
> Any idea ?
>
> Swami Bala
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Michael Pokraka <workflow at quirky.me.uk>
> >Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
> >To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> >Subject: Re: Error handling in the background task
> >Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:28:01 -0000
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from mc5-f12.hotmail.com ([65.54.252.19]) by
> mc5-s21.hotmail.com
> >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:29:18 -0800
> >Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.0.109]) by
> >mc5-f12.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Thu, 18 Mar
> 2004
> >10:28:23 -0800
> >Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by
> cherry.ease.lsoft.com
> >(LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id
> ><5.00D2B51E at cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:27:01 -0500
> >Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
> >1.8e)          with spool id 0704 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Thu, 18 Mar
> >2004          13:26:50 -0500
> >Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP at MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
> >      V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 5519; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:26:14 -0500
> >Received: from saturn.quirky.me.uk [81.2.95.188] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM
> VM
> >SMTP          Level 430) via TCP with ESMTP ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:26:13
> EST
> >Received: by saturn.quirky.me.uk (Postfix, from userid 30) id 1CA909D5;
> >Thu, 18          Mar 2004 18:28:01 +0000 (GMT)
> >Received: from 193.130.87.54 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mike) by
> >     garage.shacknet.nu with HTTP; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:28:01 -0000 (GMT)
> >X-Message-Info: loPmDlX8LgdYJFMHCtuGJK9kjn7BcGZYLFPJxYmUNQQ=
> >X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by saturn.quirky.me.uk
> >References: <BAY2-F70kPFwd1y7JCQ0001eee2 at hotmail.com>
> >User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1
> >Approved-By:  Michael Pokraka <workflow at QUIRKY.ME.UK>
> >Message-ID:  <57321.193.130.87.54.1079634481.squirrel at garage.shacknet.nu>
> >In-Reply-To:  <BAY2-F70kPFwd1y7JCQ0001eee2 at hotmail.com>
> >Precedence: list
> >Return-Path: owner-sap-wug at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2004 18:28:24.0587 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[CC9365B0:01C40D16]
> >
> >Hi Swami,
> >Define exception in method and raise it in the code using EXIT_RETURN
> >9001..... (find an example in BUS2012 or somewhere). Don't touch the WF
> >definition and it should error.
> >
> >Cheers
> >Mike
> >
> >Swami Bala wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > I tried to get some information by searching archives with no luck and
> >so I
> > > thought of checking up in the forum though it maybe very basic. I am
> > > determining agent's superiors in method which is a
> > > background task.I would like the task to go in error status or
> something
> > > that the workflow admi would get an ability to restart the workitem if
> >the
> > > manager could not be resolved and I could not make this work. Any tips
> >or
> > > suggestions in error handling for background method ?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Swami Bala
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > MSN Toolbar provides one-click access to Hotmail from any Web page
> >FREE
> > > download! http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/
> > >
> > >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get tax tips, tools and access to IRS forms   all in one place at MSN
> Money!
> http://moneycentral.msn.com/tax/home.asp
>