SWEQADM - upgrade related

[Michael Pokraka]

Hi,
I vaguely remember asking about that here as well since this is one of th=
e
gripes I have with the event linkage concept.
I'm quite happy with the activation being a transportable item, but the e=
rror
status is something that makes a lot of sense (to me anyway) to control i=
n
PRD. It is very useful to disable a workflow if there is some other syste=
m
problem or whatever and reenable it later _and_ still be able to catch up=
 any
lost workflows.
 
Just my 2c worth - as this is something that's caused me frustration one =
more
than one occasion.
Cheers
Mike
 
Heath, Darrell L. wrote:
> You may want to look at OSS Note 77430.  It indicates how changes can b=
e
> made to customizing entries in a "non-changeable" system on a table by
> table basis.
>
> Darrell
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Trant, David
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:45 AM
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: SWEQADM - upgrade related
>
> This topic came up at the Fall ASUG BITI Forum.  SAP has gone back and
> forth through recent versions on whether activation should require or
> transport or not.  A poll of the group in attendance at the forum
> indicated that customers wanted it both ways!  They'd like to be able t=
o
> include activation information in a transport so they don't have to go
> into the target system and manually activate objects and linkages, but
> they'd also like to have the ability to activate directly in a target
> environment rather than be forced to create a transport.  Alan Rickayze=
n
> from SAP took the request under advisement.  There are system settings
> to allow transports to be created in target environments, but Basis
> usually discourages this for obvious reasons.  We actually do allow thi=
s
> for select users in our productive environment and review the transport=
s
> from time to time to ensure it's not getting out of hand.
>
> David
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>> From:   SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU]  On Behalf O=
f
> Koenraad Janssens
> Sent:   Monday, March 08, 2004 8:56 AM
> To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject:        SWEQADM - upgrade related
>
> Hello All
>
> We're busy testing our new 4.7 system here and we have an event linkage
> problem.  In our 4.6B system we could just change the status of an even=
t
> light in the events with error tab without a problem.  Now in 4.7 we ge=
t
> a
> transport request in our dev. system and we can't change it in our
> acceptance system.
>
> Is this possibly a system setting?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Koenraad Janssens
> SIDMAR N.V. - ISM
> Leverage Team - Programmer
>
> ***********************************************************************=
*
> ***********
> This message should only be read by those persons to whom it is
> addressed, and may contain confidential information, the disclosure
> of which is prohibited. This message is not intended to create rights
> or obligations without subsequent written confirmation of its contents.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediatel=
y
> ***********************************************************************=
*
> ***********
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
> ------------------------
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
> this email is prohibited.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-
> ------------------------
> [mf2]
>
>