HR System

Serge Boulay Serge.Boulay at n-spro.com
Thu Jun 24 08:04:45 EDT 2004


Steve,
 
In Canada, Sobey's is working like that. They have HR on another machine =
and
you do the link by ALE to your financial system.
 
Serge
 
 
-----Message d'origine-----
De=A0: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] De la part de =
Van
der Burg, Jeroen JA SITI-ITABEE
Envoy=E9=A0: 24 juin 2004 02:01
=C0=A0: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Objet=A0: Re: HR System
 
Steve,
 
This is a workflow forum; you probably receive a better reply if you ask
your question in a HR list.
 
Next to that I do not understand your question; due to your business,
budget, support package upgrades and testing plans you may not be able =
to
run HR on your current landscape. Seems you know the answer already.=20
 
Anyway, in general I would say that it is preferable to install HR on =
it's
own landscape and integrate with your other SAP applications by =
MDM/XI/ALE
etc, as this results in a lower risk end solution. Only if your hr
implementation is expected to remain very small in both size and
functionality (certainly no payroll) you could consider using your =
current
landscape. But this is not a question that you can expect any clear cut
answer on.
 
 
Hope this helps a little bit,
 
 
Jeroen
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Johnson [mailto:steve_basis at yahoo.com]
Sent: 24 June 2004 08:30
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: HR System
 
 
Hello,
 
We are on SAP 46C ORacle 9X on Sun OS. My company
would like to go for HR, but my management preferring
to install on new landscape. This is due to support
package upgrades are required for HR and which may not
fit for my current landscape 46C due to business and
testing plans/budget.
 
Please advise if some one installed HR in standalone
systems or merged with existing systems.
 
Thanks,
Steve
 
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Thanks,
Steve Johnson
BSHG
 


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list