Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underlying Agent Determination function module

[Chatterjee, Partha (US - San Ramon)]

Hi Mike,
=20
I am not sure I understand your terminology.
=20
On PFAC_DIS, I click the simulate button (the abacus type symbol).  At =
this point, I get a pop-up which allows me to enter my custom container =
elements (Plant, Event Date, and Incident Type which are from the EH&S =
area).  After enter the custom container elements, I click the test =
button (wrench  symbol) and get the problem I am speaking about.  If I =
run the same test with the underlying function module under se37 it =
works fine and I get the Agents I am expecting in ACTOR_TAB.
=20
I am not sure what the Org Management or the Extended Object ID have to =
do with this?  So I guess answer to your question would be no as the =
parameters I am feeding the Rule do not have anything to with Org =
Management.
=20
Best regards,
Partha
 
        -----Original Message-----=20
        From: SAP Workflow on behalf of Mike Nickson=20
        Sent: Thu 7/29/2004 11:53 AM=20
        To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU=20
        Cc:=20
        Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underlying =
Agent Determination function module
=09
=09
 
        When you are simulating the rule (presumably via PFAC) there are 2
        possible ways to supply the parameters.
=09
        Either via - Org Management Object =3D USBLOGGSF
=09
        Or via - Extended Object ID =3D BLOGGSF   &   Object Type =3D US
=09
        Are these the parameters youa re using ?
=09
        Mike
=09
=09
=09
=09
=09
        "Chatterjee, Partha (US - San Ramon)" <pchatterjee at DELOITTE.com>
        Sent by: SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
        29/07/2004 15:34
        Please respond to SAP Workflow Users' Group
=09
=09
                To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
                cc:
                Subject:        Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and =
underlying Agent Determination
        function module
=09
=09
        Hi All,
=09
        I have developed a very simple rule that picks some agents from a =
custom
        table.  When I execute the function module underlying the rule in
        test/debug, the function module always behaves as expected returning =
the
        correct result to ACTOR_TAB.  However, if I simulate the rule I get 'No
        Agent Found'.  I don't quite understand what is happening between the
        two places.  We are on 4.7 extension set 2.
=09
        Has anyone run into this type of problem before?  The only relevant =
note
        I can find is 707767 but it is hard to know from the minimal problem
        description whether its appropriate.
=09
        Also, where is the place to search for q&a's on this forum.
=09
        Best regards,
=09
        > Partha Chatterjee
        >
=09
=09
=09
        This message (including any attachments) contains confidential =
information
        intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by =
law.
        If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. =
Any
        disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of =
any
        action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=09
 
 
 
 
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential =
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is =
protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should =
delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this =
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly =
prohibited.