Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underlying Agent Determination function module

[Chatterjee, Partha (US - San Ramon)]

Hi Raju,
=20
The function module works fine everytime whether user debug or not.  I =
am concerned with what the Rule is reading from the underlying fucntion =
module since it appears to be ignoring what I am getting legitimately in =
ACTOR_TAB within the function module.
=20
Best regards,
Partha
 
        -----Original Message-----=20
        From: SAP Workflow on behalf of Omkaram, Raju=20
        Sent: Thu 7/29/2004 11:22 AM=20
        To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU=20
        Cc:=20
        Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underlying =
Agent Determination function module
=09
=09
 
        Partha,
=09
        Make sure that the binding container elements are getting the right =
values
        in the FM when simulating it. Or try forcing the values for those =
elements
        in the FM in debug mode.
=09
        Raju
=09
        -----Original Message-----
        From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of
        Chatterjee, Partha (US - San Ramon)
        Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 10:03 AM
        To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
        Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underlying =
Agent
        Determination function module
=09
=09
        Hi Serge,
=09
=09
        Thanks for the reply.  All the containers elements are defined in the =
Rule.
        In case, this occurs when I simulate the Rule.  The underlying function
        module works fine (and ACTOR_TAB is filled correctly) however when I
        simulate the Rule it says No Agent Found (or Termination if I have that
        active).
=09
=09
        Best regards,
        Partha
=09
                -----Original Message-----
=09
                From: SAP Workflow on behalf of Serge Boulay
=09
                Sent: Thu 7/29/2004 10:42 AM
=09
                To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
=09
                Cc:
=09
                Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and =
underlying
        Agent Determination function module
=09
=09
=09
=09
=09
                Hi,
=09
=09
                Did you have all the Container element defined in your role so =
that
        it is
                use in your function?
=09
=09
                This is all I can see...
=09
=09
                Best regards.
=09
=09
                Serge
=09
=09
                -----Message d'origine-----
                De : SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] De la =
part
        de
                Chatterjee, Partha (US - San Ramon)
                Envoy=C3=A9 : 29 juillet 2004 09:35
                =C3=80 : SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
                Objet : Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underlying =
Agent
                Determination function module
=09
=09
                Hi All,
=09
=09
                I have developed a very simple rule that picks some agents from =
a
        custom
                table.  When I execute the function module underlying the rule =
in
                test/debug, the function module always behaves as expected =
returning
        the
                correct result to ACTOR_TAB.  However, if I simulate the rule I =
get
        'No
                Agent Found'.  I don't quite understand what is happening =
between
        the
                two places.  We are on 4.7 extension set 2.
=09
=09
=09
                Has anyone run into this type of problem before?  The only =
relevant
        note
                I can find is 707767 but it is hard to know from the minimal =
problem
                description whether its appropriate.
=09
=09
                Also, where is the place to search for q&a's on this forum.
=09
=09
                Best regards,
=09
=09
                > Partha Chatterjee
                >
=09
=09
=09
=09
=09
=09
                This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
        information
                intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is =
protected by
        law.  If
                you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this =
message.
        Any
                disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the =
taking
        of any
                action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=09
=09
=09
=09
=09
=09
        This message (including any attachments) contains confidential =
information
        intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by =
law.  If
        you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  =
Any
        disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of =
any
        action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
=09
        "This e-mail may contain confidential and/or legally proprietary =
material for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any review or =
distribution by others is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the =
intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies."
=09
 
 
 
 
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential =
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is =
protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should =
delete this message.  Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this =
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly =
prohibited.