Packages & Application components

Kjetil Kilhavn kjetilk at statoil.com
Sun Jul 25 06:33:10 EDT 2004


I try to put it in the same development class as the other solutions in
that area. For instance, say we have made a solution for individual
development plans and they want a workflow for that. I would find it
natural that the workflow was put in the same development class as the
other code for individual development plans. Of course this is not always
possible, but at least I think it is the ideal solution. The development
class should contain related solutions.
 
Different workflows don't really have anything more in common than
different function modules or different programs using batch input. No-one
would think of putting all those in the same development class just because
they use a certain technique.
--
Kjetil Kilhavn
 
 
 
 
                    Michael Pokraka
                    <workflow at quirky.me.        To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
                    uk>                         cc:     (bcc: Kjetil Kilhavn)
                    Sent by: SAP                Subject:     Packages & Application components
                    Workflow
                    <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVM
                    A.MIT.EDU>
 
 
                    28.06.2004 19:31
                    Please respond to
                    "SAP Workflow Users'
                    Group"
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hi all,
I've a small opinion poll: Does anyone actually use different packages
(development classes) & application components for their workflow
development? If so, what strategy do you use?
I haven't seen that much 'real' use of packages / development classes - WF
tends to just use one package and that's the end of it.
In order to get custom WF's into the application hierarchy however, one
would have to create and assign packages for each WF that's in a different
area (SD, MM, FI-AP etc...). Another approach would be to assign WF's to a
dev class / package belonging to the module specialists rather than have
any
workflow-specific ones.
Does anyone follow either of these strategies? Is it worth the effort just
for the benefit of being able to find the flows via the application
hierarchy?
 
Any thoughts appreciated,
Cheers
Mike
 
 
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
 


More information about the SAP-WUG mailing list