Replace WF-BATCH user as sender with user that made the "acti vity" task

[Cortes, Jose]

Hi all,
 
I have the same problem, we need to send a mail and the sender depends =
on the step. So the receiver can reply to the sender.
 
The solution proposed above needs a user to execute the "send mail" =
task as a dialog task, and I have no user to execute this  step.
 
I've found a function module UWSP_SEND_MAIL_TO_WEB where you can put =
the sender and receiver. It seems to work properly.
 
Thanks and Regards
Jos=E9 Cort=E9s
 
-----Original Message-----
From: SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of =
Wiz
David
Sent: lunes, 15 de diciembre de 2003 16:40
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Replace WF-BATCH user as sender with user that made the
"acti vity" task
 
 
Hi  Stephan and others
 
Thanks for response.
 
How to do "send mail" task as a dialog task if i'm using method =
"SELFITEM-SENDTASKDESCRIPTION" and this method is without a dialog.
 
T.I.A.
 
Wiz
 
 
Michael Pokraka <workflow at quirky.me.uk> wrote:
An idea is to use the notification feature which will use the correct =
user, the
only drawback is that you can't change the subject, and I haven't tried =
to make
these go to an internet account.
 
Just a thought which may well not apply: I've found it to cause =
confusion in
some instances, depends a little on how the email infrastructure is set =
up.
Either for the reply recipient who doesn't realize (s)he's sent a mail, =
or
could even be that the sender replies to a SAP address whilst thinking =
it's
going to an Outlook/Notes account...
Giving WF-BATCH a nicer name like 'SAP Workflow System' and putting the
originator's name as part of the subject or message ("Joe Bloggs has =
reviewed
XYZ") makes it a bit clearer that it's a system generated mail.
 
Cheers
Mike
 
--- Mark Pyc wrote:
> Nicely timed question Wiz, as I was just pondering this myself.
>
> While Stephan's approach makes excellent use of 'Advance with =
Dialog', is
> there another solution? The reason I ask is for the situation of Web
> processing (Universal Worklist etc) where Advance with Dialog doesn't
> work...
>
> It would be possible to handle the call to create the mail in the =
method
> of the previous step. This would require some bespoke/custom coding =
which
> would be ok except for things like User Decisions (not nice to have =
to
> recode me thinks).
>
> Any insights?
>
> Have fun,
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> "Becker, Stephan"
> Sent by: SAP Workflow
> 09/12/2003 14:10
> Please respond to SAP Workflow Users' Group
>
>
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> cc:
> Subject: Re: Replace WF-BATCH user as sender with user that
> made the "acti vity"
> task
>
>
> Just make the task a dialog task and assign the user explicitly.. =
ensure
> the
> user has authorisation for the send mail operation!
> Hth,
> Stephan
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Wiz David [mailto:yidysap at yahoo.com]
> Enviado el: 09 December 2003 14:06
> Para: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Asunto: Replace WF-BATCH user as sender with user that made the =
"activity"
> task
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> In my workflow I used a "send mail" task after "Activity" task to let =
the
> user to know that the task completed.
>
> My problem is that while the user gets the mail in his inbox the =
sender is
> WF-BATCH
>
> And I want to replace it with the user how made the "Activity" task.
>
>
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
>
>
> T.I.A
>
>
>
> Wiz
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
>
>
>
>
> *****SEASON'S GREETINGS FROM BOOTS*****
>
> Instead of sending corporate greetings cards this year, we are using =
our
> Christmas card budget to help Crisis open doors for homeless people. =
Find
> out more at www.crisis.org.uk
>
>
 
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now