Long Text of SendTaskDescription

[Mark Pyc]

G'day Elizabeth,
 
Do you have any similar Workflows which are working successfully?
 
Can you re-create the situation in a very simple test Workflow that either
sends 1 or 2 mails depending on a user decision. Try it with the same
tasks, try it with different tasks.
 
If it fails consistently then that is grounds for reporting to SAP. If it's
only this Workflow that is suffering, then it's time for further
investigation.
 
Have fun,
Mark
 
 
 
 
                      Smith Elizabeth
                      <elizabeth.smith at lt         To:      SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
                      ai.ie>                      cc:
                      Sent by: SAP                Subject: Re: Long Text of SendTaskDescription
                      Workflow
                      <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITV
                      MA.MIT.EDU>
 
 
                      18 Aug 2004 12:08
                      Please respond to
                      SAP Workflow Users'
                      Group
 
 
 
 
 
 
Can anybody help me with this?
 
Further information:Seperate steps are defined for both notifications
and when I look at the WF log the Success wi text is displayed as
expected!
 
Need an answer soon as we are nearing a golive situation!!
 
Elizabeth Smith
 
-----Original Message-----
From: SMITH Elizabeth IS_Dept
Sent: 28 July 2004 11:09
To: SAP-WUG (E-mail)
Subject: Long Text of SendTaskDescription
 
 
 
I have a workflow with two types of notification sent to a list of
users. 1. Change Notification with long text 'PR has been changed' and
2. Successful Notification with Long Text 'PO has been created for PR'
(Note the texts are shortened here in order to be brief)
 
My problem is : If a Change Notification is sent to users and at end of
WF a Successful Notification is sent the text received by users is that
of Change Notification sent earlier.
 
Whereas if no Change Notification is sent the Successful Notification
text is as expected.
 
It is as if something needs to be reset and it is not.
 
Does anybody have any ideas?
 
We are on version 3.1I.
 
Regards,
 
Elizabeth Smith
Lufthansa Technik Airmotive Ireland.