Many records in table SWWWIHEAD without WI_RH_TASK values

[Michael Pokraka]

Ah, that does ring a bell! Forgot about that - I think you're talking abo=
ut
4.5 or below that uses some particular type to store the object links
between business objects and IDOCs or something. The early days of GOS.
Cheers
Mike
 
 
'Mark Pyc' wrote:
> Or type D for Deadlines or A for Workqueues, but I think there is anoth=
er
> more suspicious culprit.
>
> I've been at a site that had millions of entries in that table, there w=
as
> something else that lived in that table that wasn't directly workflow
> related. But it was 2 years ago and it refuses to be recalled. Maybe
> not....
>
>
>
>
>
> Alon Raskin <araskin at eOutlook.com>
> Sent by: SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
> 20/04/2004 16:16
> Please respond to SAP Workflow Users' Group
>
>
>         To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>         cc:
>         Subject:        Re: Many records in table SWWWIHEAD without
> WI_RH_TASK values
>
>
> WAIT for Event steps generate an entry in the table but do not have a t=
ask
> associated with it. That is probably your culprit. Check the work item
> type (SWWWIHEAD-WI_TYPE)
>
> Alon
>
> ________________________________
>
>> From: SAP Workflow on behalf of Rivera, Raul
> Sent: Tue 20/04/2004 16:09
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Many records in table SWWWIHEAD without WI_RH_TASK values
>
>
>
> We are using 4.6c and went live on Jan 1, 2004.
>
> As part of our system performance monitoring, we noticed that there are
> about 700,000+ records in SWWWIHEAD table (Header Table for all Work It=
em
> Types) that have no value in WI_RH_TASK field. WI_RH_TASK contains the
> Task
> ID.
>
> Any feedback as to why we have so many records without WI_RH_TASK value=
s
> will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks everyone,
>
> Raul Rivera
> raul.rivera at absu.accenture.com
>
>